Do y’all know how many times I got wiki.archlinux.org as an answer to my question? Used to piss me off but then I learned how to use the wiki. Lol. Thanks arch iRc!
Good for Fedora for being a trendsetter regarding Wayland, though I’m sure others are right in suggesting that this is probably not being done with KDE’s express approval lol.
The normal way I believe is to provide dpkg, and rpm to cover a few distros and to make sure your software is good enough for someone to pick up and maintain packages for other/their distros. ;)
The options you already mentioned seems a good fit - with OBS being a bit rpm centric.
electron is a framework, and a shitty one if I might say so, it’s cross platform but it’s not a way to package for multiple distros. You still need to package the electron program in either the native package manager (apt, pacman, etc) or a distro-agnostic one (flatpak, appimage, snap).
but it is not an option. It’s not a tool for packaging programs.
Building an electron program is no different than building it in GTK or QT in the sense that they are just the GUI toolkit and they do not do packaging.
It’s a framework for programs to have their GUI wrapped inside a browser, so they are cross platform.
But electron doesn’t create packages. You can package an electron program using Flatpak, snap, apt, AppImage, pacman, or whatever.
Is the copied file going to a usb? Is the usb fake? Otherwise I’m pretty sure your source is bad. Probably the disk sector if you’re sure the file was at some point complete.
Something like btrfs probably does block cloning or similar so a copy to the same disk probably just points at the same disk blocks as the original.
linux
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.