I love Fedora. I like it a lot more than Linux mint. More than either, I’ve really enjoyed PopOS. It went from a distro I wasn’t sure about to my favorite really quickly. Highly recommend it.
Do y’all know how many times I got wiki.archlinux.org as an answer to my question? Used to piss me off but then I learned how to use the wiki. Lol. Thanks arch iRc!
Good for Fedora for being a trendsetter regarding Wayland, though I’m sure others are right in suggesting that this is probably not being done with KDE’s express approval lol.
The normal way I believe is to provide dpkg, and rpm to cover a few distros and to make sure your software is good enough for someone to pick up and maintain packages for other/their distros. ;)
The options you already mentioned seems a good fit - with OBS being a bit rpm centric.
electron is a framework, and a shitty one if I might say so, it’s cross platform but it’s not a way to package for multiple distros. You still need to package the electron program in either the native package manager (apt, pacman, etc) or a distro-agnostic one (flatpak, appimage, snap).
but it is not an option. It’s not a tool for packaging programs.
Building an electron program is no different than building it in GTK or QT in the sense that they are just the GUI toolkit and they do not do packaging.
It’s a framework for programs to have their GUI wrapped inside a browser, so they are cross platform.
But electron doesn’t create packages. You can package an electron program using Flatpak, snap, apt, AppImage, pacman, or whatever.
linux
Active
This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.