linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Quackdoc, in Live (Animated) wallpapers programs for linux
@Quackdoc@lemmy.world avatar

I use mpvpaper on sway and cosmic

letsgo, in Why do you use the terminal?

For simple tasks you don’t need CLI. Most GUIs implement basic workflows and do a reasonable job at it (obviously not counting the ridiculous amount of time Windows needs to “compute space requirements” while deleting an empty directory. Seems it’s more important to get that little popup on screen and run the animation a few times than actually doing the job).

It’s when you get past the basics that CLI comes into its own. Those grindy things you do in Windows clicking one thing at a time? Glue a couple of commands together in the CLI and it’s done in a tiny fraction of the time.

GustavoM, (edited ) in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@GustavoM@lemmy.world avatar

“Not exactly Linux”, but FreeBSD. Gave it a couple tries but gave up when I realized its minimalism is a placebo at best and its “super security features” can (also) be achieved on any other standard Linux distribution.

BaroqueInMind,
@BaroqueInMind@kbin.social avatar

Got any alternatives to setup OPNsense without using FBSD then?

dukatos,

Alpine + terminal :D

art, in Why do you use the terminal?
@art@lemmy.world avatar

Some applications take some time to load up visual elements that you don’t need before you can start using it. When you got a lot of work to do sometimes that just slows you down.

A lot of CLI programs do one thing and do it well while also working excellently in custom scripts.

Kecessa, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
GustavoM,
@GustavoM@lemmy.world avatar

Yes officer, this heretic right here.

Ultragramps,
@Ultragramps@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

She turned me into a newt!

QuazarOmega,

How dare you!

Carter, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

PopOS and Manjaro are two I never liked.

MNByChoice, (edited ) in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

Not too ick someone’s yum, and this ventures outside of Linux.

I dislike the BSDs. Great for getting pf, and not being a homogeneous shop, but just different enough to be difficult outside of one specific use case.

Gentoo was similar. It may be different now, but a pain on the Xbox.

Mint was too dumbed down and ugly.

Ubuntu is useful, but likely harmful with it’s constant pushes to commercialize everything.

Redhat is needed for work, but the commercialization drives worse quality. Documentation seems purposely bad to drive training courses.

(Yes, I like Debian.)

Quazatron, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@Quazatron@lemmy.world avatar

I’ve been using Xubuntu LTS on my work laptop some 10 years now. All the customization I do is remove snaps and add flatpaks. It just works.

I have RHEL and derivatives on my work machines, where I spend most of my day. I don’t like the RPM package system, which they tried to improve upon several times already. I don’t like Gnome, is too opinionated for me.

I had a colleague who used Gentoo, to claim superiority. His laptop spent most of the day burning kilowatts with the fans blowing. Not for me. Having everyone build packages from source is very unneficient. "Oh, but the security of building your own binaries! " Well, did you look at the code you’re building? No? Well then.

I end up always going back to the DEB ecosystem, with a XFCE desktop. Lately I’ve been using Manjaro with XFCE and Flatpaks, no AUR.

BaroqueInMind,
@BaroqueInMind@kbin.social avatar

What's the benefits of using Flatpacks over Docker shit?

Quazatron,
@Quazatron@lemmy.world avatar

As far as I know, docker for services, flatpak for desktop applications.

BaroqueInMind,
@BaroqueInMind@kbin.social avatar

Couldn't I simply use docker for both and eliminate redundancy?

Presi300, in Why do you use the terminal?
@Presi300@lemmy.world avatar

Makes me feel like a hacker and makes other ppl think that I’m smarter than I am… That and there are certain things that are just more convenient through the terminal

HouseWolf, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

The first distro I tried to daily drive on my desktop was Pop!_OS because everyone told me it’s the distro you “need” if you have an Nvidia card.

I’m sure it works fine for most people but I just had A LOT of issue, weird audio issues I had to fix every other time I turned on my system, some games refusing to load properly unless I forced them into borderless fullscreen.

Then one day it just refused to boot, even tho I had booted into it that morning and did nothing more than go on Youtube for an hour before work, Timeshift didn’t work even tho I had manually made a handful of backups.

Went back to Windows for about 2 months before trying EndeavourOS and despite peoples warning that Arch systems will break if you look at them the wrong way, I’ve found it way more stable on my system and any issues I have ran into have been easy fixes.

Xavier, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

I attempted to try Garuda Linux (cinnamon) on a mini PC (Ryzen 5800H based APU), but graphic artefacting was a constant issue as soon as the install started.

After several tries I had to abandon ship and wait till a new release to maybe try again, if I remember. Not exactly “Nope, this one’s not for me” as I had yet to properly try it.

Otherwise, I tried Crunchbangplusplus and just gave up for being a bit too minimalist or not yet ready for prime time as I kept geting issues after issues and did not have the patience to wrangle the whole OS for everything from getting network working to audio and screen issues on my system.

Anyways, it is always fun to try new systems/apps/protocols and see where thing are headed towards.

jelloeater85,
@jelloeater85@lemmy.world avatar

Wow I forgot about #! . That was a neat distro.

cetvrti_magi, in Why do you use the terminal?
@cetvrti_magi@lemmy.world avatar

Because I prefer using keyboard for almost everything and in most cases terminal is faster than GUI.

cetvrti_magi, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@cetvrti_magi@lemmy.world avatar

After using Arch based distros for more than a year when I use any Debian/Ubuntu based distro it really feels like they aren’t for me, at least when it comes to daily driving. I still have a laptop with PopOS that I use for school, stable distro is a better option in my oppinion for that usecase because I use it twice a week (unless it’s summer or winter in which case I don’t use it at all).

blotz, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@blotz@lemmy.world avatar

NixOS.

Cool package manager but constantly breaking compatibility with none nix package managers really annoyed me. (Ghcup, mason, etc…)

Also how difficult they made compiling software from source. I could live with nix packages if I could also compile the programs I need from source.

Great server os. I don’t understand how people use it as a daily driver

choroalp,

Its not for everyone imho as a NixOS user

blotz,
@blotz@lemmy.world avatar

Wdym “not for everyone”

0xtero, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

I've been using Debian since 1.3. Haven't really ever needed anything else.
I did "experiment" a bit when the decision to go with systemd was taken, but in the end, most distros went with it and it really isn't that big deal for me.

So it's just Debian. I need a computer that works.

owatnext, (edited )

I miss Debian sometimes, but systemD irks me.

old man yells at systemd

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #