worldofgeese,
@worldofgeese@lemmy.world avatar

I’m devastated they didn’t choose to pick up webOS for this.

squaresinger,

Well, they don’t want a mobile Linux. This is going to be a minimalist, locked-down distro that does nothing more than start a webrenderer.

Nobody’s gonna see the underlying Linux system.

It’s kinda like how my car entertainment system is running Linux. You wouldn’t know it if you don’t read the license file that comes with it.

worldofgeese,
@worldofgeese@lemmy.world avatar

WebOS powers TVs now and, from the article, Amazon intends this replacement to cover their Fire tablet line. WebOS ticks all their boxes, especially since apps in Amazon’s new flavor are intended to be delivered as React Native web apps.

asexualchangeling,

This is not what I meant when I said we need more Mobile OS competition…

ErKaf,

I literally said this to a friend just two days ago… And yes… Also not what I meant.

Maoo,
@Maoo@hexbear.net avatar

Surely this other monopoly will save us

roo,
@roo@lemmy.one avatar

It’s a new management objective.

Atemu,
@Atemu@lemmy.ml avatar

TL;DR Amazon is building a Linux distro that starts a chromium to run react native apps. Apparently, you need hundreds of people for that.

muelltonne,

TBH Amazon has a whole zoo of devices. Even if they are putting a small team of 2 or 3 people in charge for porting this to each device, they might end up with a few hundred people

TheGrandNagus,

I’m confused, why not just continue with AOSP?

It already has most of the Google stuff stripped out and any remaining parts will be easy to replace in comparison to rebuilding and maintaining a much larger software stack while also simultaneously retaining compatibility with all the android apps already on their app store.

guitarsarereal, (edited )

They want to throw this OS on smart home/automative/IoT type things. Android works in these situations, but it’s not necessarily ideal. Thing was designed for phones. It’s likely the only phone firmware in history that’s also been put in cars, espresso makers, washer/dryers, microwaves, and TV’s.

I completely get why the first waves of smart devices tended to just use Android – it’s easy to develop on and “lightweight enough” that the tradeoffs involved were generally acceptable. But those qualities only take you so far. Companies moving on to develop their own in-house OS’s for all these devices was the obvious next step.

pan_troglodytes, (edited )

hopefully they’ll design some package manager incompatible with android at the most basic level - and then double down when it’s proven to be a huge mistake. a good tick upwards for dev jobs, but the time for actual competition was over 10 years ago. this will fail miserably.

beta_tester, (edited )

Why? Chromeos is linux and can play android apps. Can’t linux run android apps as well? Waydroid, etc.?

Genuine question

sirico,
@sirico@feddit.uk avatar

For some reason I thought they had already made a nix OS

KISSmyOS,

Fire OS

FangedWyvern42,
@FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world avatar

Fire OS, but it was just a fork of Android. There are mobile Linux distributions (like postmarketOS), but Fire wasn’t one of them.

miracleorange,

They have, but it’s more of a container development kind of thing.

mateomaui,

Absolutely hell no.

notannpc,

Amazon out here thinking “could you imagine how much cheap garbage we could try to sell people if we can harvest literally all of the data directly?”

guywithoutaname,

Probably because it is stupid simple to escape their ecosystem just by sideloading apps. They want to lock you down with their own OS.

hellojack,

Well i think it will help us to access more apps

lemillionsocks, (edited )
@lemillionsocks@beehaw.org avatar

All I have to ask is why though? They already have access to skinned aosp and from there can(and do)quite a bit of tweaking on their own. Fireos has been a worse version of android for some time now and Im unsure what the benefit of making their own in house OS would be.

If it’s a true GNU/Linux OS with compatibility with linux programs, then that would be kind of neat, and if it’s open enough to let advanced users install flatpaks(I suspect it’s going to be immutable so at least flatpaks would be nice) then that could be neat. Currently it’s very easy to sideload on fireos devices and even install the play store in full so it’s possible the end product could be more like the steamdeckOS which is very much a user friendly store front end with a power user true linux experience underneath.

That said, for some reason I suspect that they will be locking things down even more and its going to be one of those many user facing linux devices that’s technically linux but very limited. Like a smart fridge interface or something. If this is the case then dropping android support would be a bad move. You lose easy/lazy portability to your store from developers who already have a product to sell and you lose many apps that already exist, and for power users you lose access to the many apps that can easily be side loaded like tachiyomi(though I imagine amazon would rather you buy from them than buy their subsidized $80 tablets to read pirated manga/comics and library books on libby)

But who knows if they actually do an OK job this could lead to a new wave of GNU compatible touch forward apps for the rest of us. Linux has gotten a lot better at touch forward design over the last 4 or 5 years on its own, but its still fairly rough.

NaoPb,

Nice try Amazon. I’m not falling for it.

yournamehere, (edited )

lets hope the devices can be rooted and we can have phosh or ubuntumobile or sth. like that flashed

Dettweiler42,

I wonder if it’s going to be as terrible as their Fire OS.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #