LainOfTheWired,
@LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol avatar
  • removes and mostly disables firmware level spyware
  • runs spyware OS
OsrsNeedsF2P,

More people run Windows than Linux, and it would help Libreboot to have that adoption

LainOfTheWired, (edited )
@LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol avatar

Don’t you mean coreboot, as the point of Libreboot is that it’s a coreboot distro that’s as open and libre as possible

Jumuta,

kinda sacrilege lmao

kanzalibrary,

I’m really curious from this, is there any perfomance impact if we change to Libreboot? if so (boost windows performance at least up to 10%) then I’ll take it for my audio plugins set live. Really cool to see T440p Libreboot-ing here!

Zeon, (edited )

Not that I’ve tested, but the peformance gain would probably be slim. Overall, its running pretty smooth on my setup.

aBundleOfFerrets,

Modern OS pretty much takes completely over after the preboot is done. There will be very negligible difference in the os unless the old firmware was poorly configured (fairly common, admittedly)

const_void,

I wish more laptops had the option for Libreboot or Coreboot. I’m so tired of the monopoly proprietary firmware vendors have.

possiblylinux127,

I think part of the problem is that all of the modern hardware is a black box on some level or another.

kanzalibrary,

+1 for this. My tech hope in 2024 is… “RISC-V has reach the perfect system for consumer level” like I installed Debian on my thinkpad laptop, without any error…

agressivelyPassive,

Not gonna happen.

There are some interesting projects going on, but a) still far from desktop performance and b) definitely not in a laptop.

kanzalibrary,

If Google and Qualcomm already develop RISC-V on smartwatch in 2023, then why not on laptop in 2024? Ohh… of course it’s because trade war chips tension that halt the development. But still… optimistic on this is not wrong either IMO. Just because “it’s far from” doesn’t mean it cannot move fast…

Dudewitbow,

Its because its not as simple as just freely supporting it. Frameworks CEO talks about it in a podcast on yhe idea if they fully went behind coreboot, the hardware release cycle would at least be a generation behind, and if youre a fledgling business whose main focus is environment, repair and upgradibility first, that would likely end in the bankruptcy of your business.

fl42v,

On a side note, t440p’s {core,libre}boot is not completely foss, they still use a proprietary blob for mrc (at least AFAIK). Yet it’s still way better than other options

Zeon, (edited )

That’s not true anymore, somebody from the community reverse engineered the MRC blob a couple months back. The only RYF concern is Intel Management Engine (which is disabled, but still its there). LibreMRC is still being tested, the resolution for SeaBIOS is still messy but it works!

fl42v,

Well, I guess I now have an incentive to order yet another t440p motherboard to bring mine back to life and go playing with it once again. Tnx for the info!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #