memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

IWantToFuckSpez, in They're Rising Up Against Us

This scene is from the movie The Cat Returns (猫の恩返し)

rockSlayer, in She helps when I cook.

My cat likes to watch me prep, she’s only interested in smelling after we’re done cooking. We’ve started to look for her approval lol it’s her highest mark if she licks her lips

Nepenthe,
@Nepenthe@kbin.social avatar

I used to have one that did that. He was aching to get on the counter and the first time he actually succeeded, I was terrified he was about to burn himself.

Nope. He just wanted to watch me cook. Sat very politely the whole time. It became a thing. Never even asked me for any of it. He just wanted to spend time with me. I miss him.

pete_the_cat,

RIP good doggo

AFallingAnvil,
@AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca avatar

Or catto

pete_the_cat,

Human recommended, dog approved.

wallmenis, in the right reacting to a leftist meme

But being insulting is fun because you get to laugh with someone else’s situation without caring about yours : )

mrbubblesort, in They're Rising Up Against Us
@mrbubblesort@kbin.social avatar

"Let the ruling classes tremble at a Feline revolution. The kittens have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world of catnip to win!"

Dave, in You have to work for food, kitten.
@Dave@lemmy.nz avatar

The dude is lying down but the phone is not on the same angle, so he’s watching it sideways?

Pons_Aelius,

Have you never watched Tv while lying on a couch?

scytale,

Yeah, but the implication here is that the phone is capable of rotating, unlike a tv. I get it though, if they don’t want to watch a landscape video in portrait.

Dave,
@Dave@lemmy.nz avatar

You can turn the whole phone? You don’t have to watch the landscape video in portrait.

Dave,
@Dave@lemmy.nz avatar

I don’t really use my TV, but spend a lot of time watching TV lying down. I turn my phone so it’s facing the right way for me to see, though I get it would be a lot harder to get the cat to hold it upright.

Franzia, in History lives in the present

Borders are violence.

Agent641,

laughs in Australian

WolfhoundRO,

laughs in emu

Rooty, (edited )

Even animals patrol and defend their territory. Why should human be any different? If anything else, borders are an improvement over constant skirmishes and raids where two different ethnic groups meet.

EDIT: Interesting how you completely ignored the “Borders are a solution to constant ethnic clashes” part of my comment

SasquatchBanana,

Animals kill and eat their young. They roll or eat shit. They rape. You sure that’s the argument you want to use here?

Flumsy,

That’s bad. But why are borders bad?

Nacktmull,

Freedom good! Borders restrict freedom. Borders bad!

Flumsy,

Freedom good! Borders allow different systems or countries to exist so you have the FREEDOM to choose the one you like the most instead of there being only one option. Borders good!

Nacktmull, (edited )

I´ll assume you are just uninformed and not a hypocrite. Refugees get stuck, pushed back and even killed at borders all around the world when trying to choose the country they like the most. Borders bad!

UnrepententProcrastinator,

The animals argument is bad. We are animals and the idea is to refrain of our bad instincts in favour of the greater good most of the time.

That being said abolition of borders is a very bad idea, a very basic visit of human history will squash any misplaced idealism regarding that subject.

That also being said immigration is most of the time a good idea as long as you put a consideratr effort into integration for your newly minted citizens.

Now I realize most of those are opinions without substance, the idea is to realize where people push back and why before backing them up.

Killing_Spark,

“animals do it why shouldn’t we” is one of the worst reasons to do something. Animals are literally dumber than us.

Gabu,

You are an animal…

ssboomman,

The animals argument is fucking stupid.

How exactly are borders helping? In what was specifically?

Lemmiwinks,

These comments read like a realism vs idealism debate

Nalivai,

The reason ethnic clashes are happening in the first place, is because there was not enough intermingling between neighbors, in big part because people like you thought humans aren’t smarter then animals and should be separated.

Gabu,

Humans aren’t smarter than animals because we are animals. We’re also not smarter than non-human animals either, as evidenced by our self-destructive behavior.

Killing_Spark,

Easy now dont cut yourself on the edge you’ve got there bucko

Gabu,

Are you a bot, or just really dumb? That phrase doesn’t even apply…

Killing_Spark,

Comeone you are going around all “Hurr durr humans aren’t smarter than animals, we are so self-destructive” that’s an edgelord position if I’ve ever seen one

Gabu,

Got it, it was the second option.

Killing_Spark,

You know what I was typing up a whole argument about how the “if you are self-destrucive you are dumb and therefore an animal” logic is flawed but then I remembered I am on the internet and get to do this fun thing instead:

No U

Gabu,

On top of it, you’re functionally illiterate, cool.

At no point did I state being an animal is a consequence of lack of intellect or of an action – go back to school, you clearly need it.

Killing_Spark, (edited )

Humans aren’t smarter than animals because we are animals. We’re also not smarter than non-human animals either, as evidenced by our self-destructive behavior.

Great let’s dissect this then:

Firstly you are for some reason making the choice to ignore the common meaning of “animal” meaning (very broadly) non-human lifeform. Yeah yeah go ahead and nitpick about mushrooms and plants if you want to. Showing that you see animals and humans in the same category.

The first sentence thus becomes a tautology because you moved the goalpost to include humans in the term “animal”. I bet you felt clever about that. Just to then go ahead and make that same distinction but with more words “non-human animal”. Because, turns out, its a useful distinction to make. I’m gonna go ahead and ignore your ignoring of this and use “animal” to refer to “non-human animals”.

You claim that humans aren’t smarter than animals, which you further claim to be evidenced by the “self-destructivene behaviour” humans display. So you are at least saying that the level of intellect is dependent on the behaviour, and thus the actions, of a species. I’m now claiming that you putting animals and humans in the same catgegory stems from this false equivalence of intellects, which by your logic is dependent on the actions.

So yes, while you never explicitly said that “being an animal is a consequence of lack of intellect or of an action” your logic and phrasing make it clear that you see animals and humans in the same category, and the reason for that is the, according to you, equivalent level of intellect and actions.

Edit: I am forgetting my nettiquette again, so sorry!

go back to school, you clearly need it

No U

Gabu, (edited )

Firstly you are for some reason making the choice to ignore the common meaning of “animal” meaning (very broadly) non-human lifeform.

That’s not a common meaning, it’s the morons’ meaning.

Showing that you see animals and humans in the same category.

As does anyone with a brain.

then go ahead and make that same distinction but with more words “non-human animal”

Are you braindead?

So you are at least saying that the level of intellect is dependent on the behaviour, and thus the actions, of a species.

No. Go back to 1st grade English, your ability to derive meaning from words is simply not there. Everything following this fallacy isn’t even worth talking about.

Killing_Spark,

That’s not a common meaning, it’s the morons’ meaning.

Cambridge dictionary has both definitions, the more common one first

something that lives and moves but is not a human, bird, fish, or insect

anything that lives and moves, including people, birds, etc

dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/…/animal

Wikipedia has this to say:

The word “animal” comes from the Latin animalis, meaning ‘having breath’, ‘having soul’ or ‘living being’. The biological definition includes all members of the kingdom Animalia. In colloquial usage, the term animal is often used to refer only to nonhuman animals.

So your argument here is basically “But I have big brain because I use the correct word as defined in biological science as opposed to the morons that use language colloquailly on the internet”. Good job.

Showing that you see animals and humans in the same category.

As does anyone with a brain.

I mean yeah sure they are in the same category in the sense that both have evolved from the same basis. But humans have evolved further than animals, which is why there is commonly a distinction made between humans and animals without having to say non-human animals.

Examples are:

  • animal cruelty
  • animal rights
  • animal shelter

Obviously none of these relate to humans, because everyone with a brain uses the term animal to mean life that is not human.

Are you braindead?

It sure feels that way when I talk to you, because you are draining my will to live.

behaviour [SIC]

Imagine not knowing that behaviour is a valid spelling of the word everywhere but the place that had to drop the letter U from words to feel special. Time to make a few more rounds in the spelling bee

Gabu,

have evolved further

This sentence alone tells me you don’t have an inkling of a proper thought in your smooth marble of a brain. A biologist would punch you for saying that - I’m being nice, here.

Once again, your argumentation is fallacious and based on fallacious reasoning. I won’t address this moronic waste of time.

Killing_Spark,

I am again surprised that we apparently are supposed to be talking with rigorous scientific accuracy, here in a thread about terror attacks, between people that are, obviously, not biology scientists.

What I obviously meant was that humans have evolved to have the capacity to do things that no other species can do.

Once again, your argumentation is fallacious and based on fallacious reasoning

Once again, No U

Gabu,

The fact you think basic, school children-level science is “rigorous scientific accuracy” is once again proof that you’re brainless.

Killing_Spark,

Meh okay tbh you were more fun when you had more lines than one on repeat.

I guess take your fish >::<'>

Killing_Spark,

Interesting how you ignore the reality of constant ethnic clashes and raids inside the borders of many african nations and also across borders e.g. Armenia vs Azerbaijan, Kosovo vs Serbia, Russia vs Ukraine or… Palestine vs Israel.

irmoz,

What makes you think we should act just like wild animals?

MissJinx,
@MissJinx@lemmy.world avatar

Borders are violence.

Religion is violence

ssboomman,

Why not both?

MissJinx,
@MissJinx@lemmy.world avatar

good argument. Agreed

praise_idleness, in Gomennasai, baka

My first language is Korean. It’s impossible not to get a few concept of Japanese language watching anime for extended period of time. They are very similar to each other, with most of the concept more straightforward in Japanese.

I think what makes Japanese hard(especially for the westerners) is reading/writing. Most Korean people learn Hanja or, in Japanese, Kanji(they are not 100% same but almost interchangable) to some degree. This was a huge advantage for me learning Japanese since I can read/write most of the common words before I even speak the language.

nonfuinoncuro, (edited )

The cognates are what make it so easy. It’s like adding -o to English words to get Spanish; you can just add -u to Korean to get Japanese pronunciation like 약속 --> やくそく

Cultural concepts translate directly, e.g., 선배/후배 --> 先輩/後輩, honorifics in general, 月火水

Also you might enjoy this: youtu.be/HiUGWXe6Yzk?si=8g35dQxxbXOGW27c

navi, in Guys?

Don’t worry! You’re in the Good Place.

lugal, in New Halloween monsters

Let’s make these costumes and sell them to end up on the winning side of each!

BarrierWithAshes, in New Halloween monsters
@BarrierWithAshes@kbin.social avatar

bro dressed as ENA

Kusimulkku, in the right reacting to a leftist meme

I think their usual complaint that leftist memes can be really wordy. Which, yeah it’s true.

magnetosphere, in the right reacting to a leftist meme
@magnetosphere@kbin.social avatar

Excellent choice for the pic. Their facial expressions are both perfect!

Crackhappy, in They're Rising Up Against Us
@Crackhappy@lemmy.world avatar
yoz, in You have to work for food, kitten.

Capitalism?

RQG,
@RQG@lemmy.world avatar

Catpitalism

DessertStorms, in They're Rising Up Against Us
@DessertStorms@kbin.social avatar

I, for one, openly embrace our kitty overlords..

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #