If pants wore pants...
BlanK0, First one definitely 😂
EvolvedTurtle, Right Because the left would get significantly more difficult once you start adding more pants
AgentGrimstone, Okay, which one of you wears pants on each leg?
hperrin, Pants have the same number of legs as people. This joke is getting absurd.
solivine, 
That’s the joke
hperrin, Yes. And it’s absurd.
solivine, It’s a type of humour I suppose, I like absurd humour that makes fun of the concept
RagingRobot, So you’re saying the one in the right then?
veroxii, Asked my 10 year old. Definitely the right hand side. “Because on the left the pants are now shorts.”
starman2112, (edited ) 
Did the pants on the left split its legs down the middle?
son_named_bort, I’m pretty sure the right is how people wear pants in the winter.
TehBamski, 
The right side makes the most sense to me.
qisope, 
given that the word 'pants ’ sounds like a plural, perhaps we can assume each leg is an independent entity and deserves its own pair of pants. i chose left.
moistclump, But we have “legs” and give each leg a pant. Therefore wouldn’t each pant also just have one pant?
EvolvedTurtle, Pant
fossphi, Who are you, who is so wise in the ways of science?
IndiBrony, 
“Yes, Sir. I would like to buy one pant!”
ImplyingImplications, This is how you say it in French. “Un Pantalon”
ReverendIrreverence, 
Like on the right. Left side is wasteful and floppy
Dave, 
I mean, the humans think it’s cool to take perfectly good pants, tear holes in them until there are hardly any pants, and wear them like that. Maybe pants are even cooler?
dimeslime, Do pants feel pain?
Add comment