mildlyinteresting

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Cracks_InTheWalls, in I got the #1 kumquat in my bag
@Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works avatar
MystikIncarnate,
Cracks_InTheWalls,
@Cracks_InTheWalls@sh.itjust.works avatar

Nicely done

jordanlund, in Cookie experiments
@jordanlund@lemmy.world avatar
ElderWendigo, (edited ) in Cookie experiments

Forget this guide because their control recipe is less than perfect. This recipe is perfect. Fight me. I didn’t perfect it, America’s Test Kitchen did. Kudos to them.

I call this recipe perfect, not only because it makes the exact kind of cookie I crave, but because it can go from stored ingredients to finished cookie in the time it takes to prepare (without the hassle of softening butter) and it will make your house smell heavenly the entire time.

Buy good (and fresh) ingredients, you can’t make perfect cookies with rubbish ingredients.

Perfect Browned Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies

INGREDIENTS

  • 1-3/4 cups (210g) unbleached all-purpose flour
  • 1/2 (3g) teaspoon baking soda
  • 14 tablespoons (197g) unsalted butter
  • 1/2 cup (99g) granulated sugar
  • 3/4 cups (160g) packed dark brown sugar
  • 1 teaspoon (9g) table salt
  • 2 teaspoons (11.2g) vanilla extract
  • 1 large egg
  • 1 large egg yolk
  • 1-1/4 cups (296mL) semisweet chocolate chips
  • 3/4 cup (177mL) chopped pecans or chopped toasted walnuts (optional)

PREPARATION Adjust oven rack to middle position and heat oven to 375 degrees. Line 2 large (18- by 12-inch) baking sheets with parchment paper. Whisk flour and baking soda together in medium bowl; set aside.

Heat 10 tablespoons (140g) butter in 10-inch skillet over medium-high heat until melted, about 2 minutes. Continue cooking, swirling pan constantly until butter is dark golden brown and has nutty aroma, 1 to 3 minutes. Remove skillet from heat and, using heatproof spatula, transfer browned butter to large heatproof bowl.

Stir remaining 4 tablespoons butter into hot butter until completely melted. Add both sugars, salt, and vanilla to bowl with butter and whisk until fully incorporated. Add egg and yolk and whisk until mixture is smooth with no sugar lumps remaining, about 30 seconds. Let mixture stand 3 minutes, then whisk for 30 seconds. Repeat process of resting and whisking 2 more times until mixture is thick, smooth, and shiny. Using rubber spatula or wooden spoon, stir in flour mixture until just combined, about 1 minute. Stir in chocolate chips and nuts (if using), giving dough final stir to ensure no flour pockets remain.

Divide dough into 16 portions, each about 3 tablespoons (or use cookie scoop). Arrange 2 inches apart on prepared baking sheets, 8 dough balls per sheet. (Smaller baking sheets can be used, but will require 3 batches.)

Bake cookies 1 tray at a time until cookies the edges have begun to set but centers are still soft, 10 to 14 minutes, rotating baking sheet halfway through baking.

Transfer baking sheet to wire rack; cool cookies completely before serving.

Give these cookies away. Seriously, they are too delicious. Your waistline and your neighbors will thank you. Just don’t give any cookies to the ignorant fucks whining about units. They got the conversion all wrong anyway.

jws_shadotak,

Just made these. They’re amazing, except next time I think I’ll use about half the chocolate chips.

Rai,

Damn. That sounds excellent.

nifty,
@nifty@lemmy.world avatar

I love you.

adamkempenich,
@adamkempenich@lemmy.world avatar

Make sure you leave enough room for me to give that feller some of MY love too!

state_electrician, (edited )

Edit: I am actually not sure about the amount of butter. Another table I found would give the amount as about 400g, which is insane. That would make this just butter with sugar and some stuff to keep it all together. But on the other hand that does sound very American.

The recipe translated for the mentally sane:

Perfect Browned Butter Chocolate Chip Cookies

INGREDIENTS


<span style="color:#323232;">~150g unbleached all-purpose flour
</span><span style="color:#323232;">1/2 teaspoon baking soda
</span><span style="color:#323232;">200g unsalted butter
</span><span style="color:#323232;">100g granulated sugar
</span><span style="color:#323232;">150g packed dark brown sugar
</span><span style="color:#323232;">1 teaspoon table salt
</span><span style="color:#323232;">2 teaspoons vanilla extract
</span><span style="color:#323232;">1 large egg
</span><span style="color:#323232;">1 large egg yolk
</span><span style="color:#323232;">100g semisweet chocolate chips
</span><span style="color:#323232;">100g chopped pecans or chopped toasted walnuts (optional)
</span>

PREPARATION Adjust oven rack to middle position and heat oven to 190 degrees. Line 2 large (30-45cm) baking sheets with parchment paper. Whisk flour and baking soda together in medium bowl; set aside.

Heat 150g butter in 25cm skillet over medium-high heat until melted, about 2 minutes. Continue cooking, swirling pan constantly until butter is dark golden brown and has nutty aroma, 1 to 3 minutes. Remove skillet from heat and, using heatproof spatula, transfer browned butter to large heatproof bowl.

Stir remaining 50g butter into hot butter until completely melted. Add both sugars, salt, and vanilla to bowl with butter and whisk until fully incorporated. Add egg and yolk and whisk until mixture is smooth with no sugar lumps remaining, about 30 seconds. Let mixture stand 3 minutes, then whisk for 30 seconds. Repeat process of resting and whisking 2 more times until mixture is thick, smooth, and shiny. Using rubber spatula or wooden spoon, stir in flour mixture until just combined, about 1 minute. Stir in chocolate chips and nuts (if using), giving dough final stir to ensure no flour pockets remain.

Divide dough into 16 portions, each about 3 tablespoons (or use cookie scoop). Arrange 5cm apart on prepared baking sheets, 8 dough balls per sheet. (Smaller baking sheets can be used, but will require 3 batches.)

Bake cookies 1 tray at a time until cookies the edges have begun to set but centers are still soft, 10 to 14 minutes, rotating baking sheet halfway through baking.

Transfer baking sheet to wire rack; cool cookies completely before serving.

Iron_Lynx,

Thank you for translating this recipe from to the rest of the world.

ElderWendigo, (edited )

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • gmtom,

    This comment is WILD.

    They convert to mass precisely because volume changes so much with density.

    my 100g of sugar will always be exactly the same as your 100g of sugar

    But my 1 cup of sugar is going to be different to your 1 cup of sugar depending on how densely packed it is.

    state_electrician,

    One cup of flour weighs less than one cup of sugar and different kinds of sugar also have different mass. And I rounded up or down to be in line with usual recipe amounts. But what I saw from the ranges given by helpful people here and what I found online, these vague recipes can fuck a rake. A fucking tablespoon of butter alone can be anything from 10 to 40 gram. With 14 tablespoons that gives you a range from 140g to 560g. That’s insanity.

    ElderWendigo,

    That’s why it’s just easier to work in the original units of the recipe instead of needlessly converting it for nor real benefit. We’re making a single batch of cookies, not bread for an army or drugs; SI units and excessive precision just don’t matter that much. The recipe isn’t vague, just your understanding. A tablespoon isn’t a vague measurement, you’re just trying to adapt it to a needlessly precise unit of measure and forgetting everything your maths and sciense teachers should have taught you about significant digits.

    SRo,

    So what are 14 tablespoons now? About 150 grams or over half a kilo? Because that’s a massive difference. If that isn’t vague, what is it?

    state_electrician,

    A tablespoon as measurement for a non-fluid is extremely vague. How much mass do you pile onto it? There’s an extremely wide range of possibilities.

    Also, this entire discussion under a post about how much different amounts of ingredients affect the outcome is just rich. Your recipe could be all of the examples in OP’s picture, depending on how people interpret it. If you treat baking recipes as art, sure, your recipe is great. If you want reproducible outcomes across different people it’s useless.

    state_electrician, (edited )

    I hear that people like US recipes because they don’t use exact metrics and instead use spoons and cups and those are supposedly easier to scale. In baking I absolutely hate that. Give me metric units. I have no problems scaling those up or down as required. What’s a cup? I have .2 liter cups and .4 liter. How the fuck is that supposed to be easier? And what’s up with tablespoons of butter? Depending on how much you put on a spoon that can easily mean double/half as much butter. With grams and liters there is no doubt and no second-guessing.

    Dravin, (edited )

    A cup in US Customary is 237 ml (often rounded to 240 ml). Americans don’t exist in a world where they have to play “is this cup US Customary or different measure also calling itself a cup measure?” as all their measuring cups are going to be in US Customary. Butter usually comes in quarter pound sticks with teaspoon (4.9 ml) and tablespoon (14.8 ml) measures printed on the wrapper so you can just cut a hunk of the appropriate volume from the stick and if you were using a measuring spoon to measure butter you’d use a level measure to create consistency and not just let it heap up.

    Note: I prefer weighing ingredients and in metric at that. I’m just answering your questions.

    state_electrician,

    Cool, thank you! How much would be a tablespoon of butter in grams? Like 25g or 50g?

    Dravin, (edited )

    1 tablespoon of butter is ~14 g. For a more complete conversion (with respect to butter): 1 stick = 0.5 cup = 8 tablespoons = 24 teaspoons = 113 g.

    state_electrician,

    Thank you again!

    Dravin, (edited )

    You’re welcome. A nice resource for a bunch of other ingredients for baking is this one from King Arthur Flour.

    SoleInvictus, (edited )
    @SoleInvictus@lemmy.world avatar

    Weighing ingredients is so much better. I can cook significantly faster when I don’t have to measure volumetrically, plus recipes scale so much more easily. If I want to make 3.134 of a recipe, weight is the way to go.

    Dravin, (edited )

    Oh, I agree. If I use a recipe regularly I’ll often convert it or if I’m creating one from scratch I’ll usually just have everything by weight from get go.

    P.S. Nothing makes me annoyed at a recipe faster than seeing something like 2.5 cups of chopped broccoli.

    BlueLineBae,
    @BlueLineBae@midwest.social avatar

    This is very close to the “perfect” recipe I use from Tasty. But they add in a little bit of espresso powder. It’s not enough to make the cookies taste like coffee, but it does make the chocolate flavor more intense. I really like this recipe, but now I want to try the ATK recipe and see which one is better because I swear by the Tasty recipe ever since I found it. Here it is if anyone’s curious: tasty.co/…/tasty-101-ultimate-brown-butter-chocol…

    hungprocess, in a miniature vase made on a potters' wheel, glazed and fired (cat for scale)
    @hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org avatar
    Piemanding,

    SMH my head. The insurance would have covered it.

    bjoern_tantau, in I got the #1 kumquat in my bag
    @bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de avatar

    At first glance I thought those were stitches.

    MrJameGumb, in Cookie experiments
    @MrJameGumb@lemmy.world avatar

    I’m a fan of whichever one of these makes the cookies crispy on the bottom.

    Got_Bent, in Cookie experiments

    Does baking powder mean lots of it or none of it?

    Annoyed_Crabby,

    Usually the recipe call for baking soda, i assume for this one they replace baking soda with baking powder?

    LEDZeppelin, in We hit one third of boomers being dead in the last few days.

    Extinction 2086?? TIL those born in 2010 are boomers

    Mbourgon, in Cookie experiments

    How do I make it so that when they come straight from the freezer, they don’t shatter but can be gnawed on?

    Annoyed_Crabby,

    More brown sugar to white sugar ratio i think, molasses helps with the chewyness of the cookie. I use 165g of brown sugar with 150g of white sugar and it still comes out chewy after the dough being frozen.

    altima_neo,
    @altima_neo@lemmy.zip avatar

    I just skip the brown sugar entirely. I use all white sugar but with a tablespoon or so of molasses.

    Brown sugar is just white sugar with molasses mixed in. Seems redundant to keep a separate ingredient around when molasses does the trick!

    Annoyed_Crabby,

    Yep! I only have jaggery and i don’t know how to measure those or molasses so i keep brown sugar for that case and jaggery for malaysian dessert

    altima_neo,
    @altima_neo@lemmy.zip avatar

    I like to keep a jar of molasses since it’s so handy. Oatmeal cookies, pumpkin or banana bread, ginger snaps, etc

    Whenever I kept brown sugar, it would always go hard on me.

    Mbourgon,

    Thanks! I’ll give that a try

    LinkOpensChest_wav, in Cookie experiments

    I would happily eat each and every one of these experiments, for science

    Municipal0379,

    For science!!

    TropicalDingdong, in We hit one third of boomers being dead in the last few days.
    rockSlayer, in We hit one third of boomers being dead in the last few days.

    2039 is the half-life of the boomer generation, assuming all of them were born in 1964 and will live exactly 75 years

    letsgo,

    That’s not what half-life means. Half-life comes from radioactive decay and is the time for half the atoms in a sample to decay. After half the atoms have decayed it takes another half-life for half the remaining atoms (a quarter of the original sample) to decay. There’s some fancy maths you can do to convert a sample size of 85 million with a half-life of 75 years into the time it takes for the last atom to decay but at an estimation of about 27 half-lives that’s 2025 years.

    Maybe that’s the real problem with boomers: their multi-thousand year lifespan!!

    ebits21, in We hit one third of boomers being dead in the last few days.
    @ebits21@lemmy.ca avatar

    That’s a lot of dead boomers in a few days …

    trk, in We hit one third of boomers being dead in the last few days.
    @trk@aussie.zone avatar

    Almost good enough odds to do Rookery in UBRS

    CraigeryTheKid,

    just don’t touch the eggs!

    Cruxifux, in We hit one third of boomers being dead in the last few days.

    How disappointed we will all be when all the boomers are dead and it doesn’t solve any of our problems.

    Skyrmir,

    The next most conservative generation is Gen X. All few dozen of us. Expect those with power to retain it with massive use of wealth to constrain the rules of democracy, rather than numbers of voters.

    Veneroso,

    But then you have to blame the job creators!?

    Hux,

    I dunno, I feel like if I lived through the Black Death and I was there when—at the end of the suffering, surrounded by death—the last plague rat died, I’d take it as a win…

    willis936,

    They’re smart to balance their checkbooks on the way out. They never let any opportunity to consume go to waste.

    SomeGuy69,

    The issues they left behind will last for generations. Funny that anyone could believe this goes away in our lifetime.

    rwhitisissle,

    Many of the issues they leave behind are ones that existed when they were born.

    Kusimulkku,

    Or that we won’t make new problems that we get to blame on new generations. It will never end

    MaxVoltage, (edited )
    @MaxVoltage@lemmy.world avatar

    most boomers where lost generation per them

    i said what i said

    militaryintelligence,

    They were called the Me Generation but they got offended and changed it to Boomer

    Klear,

    Boomer is a state of mind. They are never going extinct.

    Rookwood,

    It will solve the problem of their voting habits. They have lead us down this insane path because they are a narcissistic generation. Things won’t be perfect, but we might, just might, start turning things around. If we still can.

    AllonzeeLV, (edited )

    We’ll just have to see, won’t we?

    Plus, it’s not like the climate will just snap back into place when the boomers are finally too old for their skeleton talons to cling to power. That shit is going to take generations of sacrifice to roll back, if it doesn’t topple civilization first.

    noaa.gov/…/warmest-arctic-summer-on-record-is-evi…

    The whole ethos of the majority of baby boomers seems to have been to raze the forest they got to enjoy behind them (as opposed to planting trees whose shade they’d never sit in like most generations aspire to), and they seem to be having remarkable success in that.

    Sorgan71,

    thats the ethos you project onto boomers, not the ethos boomers live by.

    AllonzeeLV, (edited )

    The results speak for themselves. The majority of their generation’s attitudes about the results indicate satisfaction with the results.

    Sorgan71,

    Not true. You dont know what they think or feel

    iheartneopets,

    Ok boomer

    NJSpradlin, (edited )

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Rookwood,

    The wealthy are savvy but with the boomers gone they lose a lot of their support. Of course they will try to maintain the status quo, but the people will be affected by the material conditions and see the truth. The only thing we have to fear is hate, but MTG, Boebart and Desantis were all elected by Boomers. Young people don’t vote for those idiots. I’m more concerned about Andrew Tate.

    nilloc,

    This isn’t new though, many boomers were the hippies at one point, they had the photocopier, fairness doctrine TV & Radio and liberal attitudes for sex, gender, and civil rights.

    But the same tactics were used to stop and convert many of them, plus around half of them were the same sort of assholes that give them a bad name now.

    Vespair,

    Because that’s how it works, right? When your house is flooded because of a burst pipe, when you replace the pipe then your house is magically unflooded right? I mean of course no reasonable person thinks that, but that seems to be the understanding you’re suggesting. Meanwhile you’re trying to say that if we do repair the pipe and the house is still flooded, rightly acknowledging that the pipe is 100% the cause of the flood is somehow… wrong?

    The facts are that boomers fucked the world up, heavily, and did everything they could to hold onto power and rob the next generation (at least) of their deserved place in the driver’s seat of society, and cleaning up the messes and lessons left over by the boomers will take generations to clean up. The fact that boomer built long-term systemic problem without simple solutions does not mean that the boomers are not entirely at fault or that we aren’t entirely better off without them.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #