LWD,

Apple: innovating, despite their best efforts

Zerush, (edited )
@Zerush@lemmy.ml avatar

Sorry for the devs who had years of nightmares and insomnia to get their browsers to work on this thing

https://file.coffee/u/ga3_cTune2Bcle1JQCl1V.png

Last news alternativeto.net/…/apple-has-officially-announce…

Samsy,

Chrome Engine isn’t called Chromium, it’s Blink.

Voltage,

I wish I was born in europe rn lol. tbh with india’s population the gov could try something similar and apple would likely comply to not lose a huge amount of potential consooomers. Android has always been the dominating mobile os here but apple is slowly gaining numbers and they wouldn’t like to see the graph go down.

CodaChroma,
@CodaChroma@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Only in the EU which is typical. I wonder if there will be a way to spoof it for the US

SnotFlickerman, (edited )
@SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

Oh I’m sure there will be. It will be technically difficult (but not impossible) for them to allow other app-stores and sideloading but have the hardware and software be different enough in both markets to not have some slip through.

I suspect there will be lots of hacky shit for this.

GregorGizeh, (edited )

Sounds like jailbreaking with extra steps

errorlab, (edited )

I remember that there was an identifier based on model number. FaceTime wasn’t allowed in the Middle East for a while, there was a way to tell if the model will support it based on the last character after the / in the model number. Middle East models won’t even have the app at all.

Propably they’ll do the same for models sold in the EU.

There are already hardware variants of the same iPhone. I think the US gets an iPhone with all eSIM, and China has two physical SIM slots.

T0RB1T,
@T0RB1T@lemmy.ca avatar

This is actually huge.

I’m far FAR from an Apple user, but the moment this is available, I’ll be seeing if I can install FireFox with µBlock Origin on my partner’s phone.

c10l,

For what it’s worth you can get uBO on Orion browser right now.

Last time I tried to use that browser it was too buggy for me though.

steal_your_face,
@steal_your_face@lemmy.ml avatar

Yeah tried it like a month ago and it was too buggy for me as well. Safari on iOS does already support ad blockers though they’re not as good as ublock origin most likely.

willya,
@willya@lemmyf.uk avatar

Blocking is far better on the VPN routing level then bothering with a browser extension.

T0RB1T,
@T0RB1T@lemmy.ca avatar

Cool! Are you talking about something like pi-hole or something else? In what way is it going to lead to better outcomes? I already have a pretty much flawless experience with my adblockers (especially when it comes to easily creating custom rules, using the element zapper, and testing new blocklists).

I find that my suite of browser extensions serves me really well, and it keeps working even when I enable my VPN, but something like pi-hole stops working if you do that.

How does the solution you’re talking about differ? How does it provide a better experience?

OfficerBribe, (edited )

It’s the other way around. DNS based filters are more efficient since connection attempt is simply dropped, but browser based adblocks are a lot more feature rich allowing blocking specific HTML elements not just domains. Additional CPU power to have such extension is miniscule compared to what you gain.

willya,
@willya@lemmyf.uk avatar

I use a combo as I like the blocks happening within apps as well.

OfficerBribe,

Same here, but I have disabled it for Firefox and let uBlock handle browser. Some sites detected and disliked DNS level blocking.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #