no.. just no
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/02526/025268d8b7b6bb2c51918a9eaeffa45657a8c8e0" alt=""
dylanTheDeveloper, ![]()
Omg that’s terrible! Link?
mlg, ![]()
“HTTP and the Web is a totally reliable and easy to use internet protocol”
Thcdenton,
istoff, Is that select * ?
I expect it looks more cumbersome with joins and multiple columns from different tables.
adamth0, That’s what I was wondering. It’s doing a SELECT, but not saying exactly which columns it wants to retrieve.
httpjames, ![]()
Joins must be a pain in the ass with hooks
leftzero, Of course not… where’s the damn <From> tag…?
SaltyIceteaMaker, ![]()
got no clue abot sql. what is wrong and how is it supposed to look like?
schnurrito, SQL is supposed to look like this: SELECT status, name FROM some_table LIMIT 5
ILikeBoobies, (edited ) Different language
Daxtron2, this basically xml being made to look like SQL. It’s gross and that’s why it’s funny
traches, SQL is run on the server to communicate with a database. The screenshot is jsx, which is a front-end, UI templating language. Writing SQL this way is cursed
SirQuackTheDuck, It could be querying the in-browser database (that’s commonly used, such as with WhatsApp web), which would be seeded by a different part of the application
utopianfiat, Except that’s still a SQL dialect, not JSX. There’s no need to make this JSX.
Reptorian, I kind of like it. I can understand where it start and end.
RagingRobot, It’s kind of like graphQl you could make a compiler that would work with this.
utopianfiat, but why
TheFerrango, Sharepoint queries are written in something very similar 🤢
I still have nightmares from the one time I had to use that.
NigelFrobisher, Needs JSON embedded in the elements because JSON is best practice.
Add comment