science_memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

pimento64, in This is my Vietnam.

Treasure your badly-scanned papers from 1980, and be thankful you didn’t have to do historical research by sorting through bad scans from the 1980s of printouts of microfilm archives (yes, instead of scanning the microfilm) of photos of the original documents that were photographed in 1961 at a 45° angle by a lazy archivist who used the cheapest film he could get his hands on. And the scans have blotches that make some pages literally unreadable because the microfilms were allowed to sit exposed to moisture for 25 years before being digitized. No I’m not bitter and my collegiate education wasn’t a waste, not one bit of either.

trinitrotoluene, in CAPTCHA

GOTCHA

Shurimal, in CAPTCHA

While the picture of the PCB is just blurry enough to be virtually illegible, it should also be a black-and-white photocopy of 13th generation for maximum effect.

HerbalGamer, in Your Brain Is Not an Onion With a Tiny Reptile Inside

Then why does it make me cry?

LegionEris, in Your Brain Is Not an Onion With a Tiny Reptile Inside

Well obviously. We’d smell the onions if they were just inside of our noses and all around us in crowds. It must be a gourd or something with a lower scent profile.

navigatron, in Your Brain Is Not an Onion With a Tiny Reptile Inside

Why not? What if I want it to be

SSUPII, in Your Brain Is Not an Onion With a Tiny Reptile Inside

Hard disagree, I am the reptile

StellarExtract, in True

I think that guy is speeding

argh_another_username, in Ten points from Griffindor!!

Poor plasma. It’s the most abundant state in the universe and always forgotten.

darcy,
@darcy@sh.itjust.works avatar

not to mention the other 14 or so

SSUPII,
BurnedDonutHole, in void

I mean technically it’s not in your heart. It’s the arteries that gets filed with cholesterol plaques. You die due to the lack of blood in your heart which is ironically causing a bigger void that causes you to die.

HawlSera, in Point taken

What’s an LK99? I’m out of the loop.

HawlSera, in 🐈‍⬛

This reminds me of all the generalizations RationalWiki jumps to when it wants to debunk something it doesn’t understand.

Mind you I’m not saying you can cure cancer with rocks unless those rocks are processed into the materials needed for chemotherapy

I’m saying this site is horrible at debunking things even when those things are easy to take part.

maccentric, in honesty is key

“… if this kind of earthquake occurred, it would probably be a 1-in-10,000-year event.[18]”

So, when was the last one?

Seems pretty high in geological terms

Opafi, in honesty is key

The Richter scale doesn’t end at 10?

DragonTypeWyvern,

But a quake higher than 10 is considered impossible with current conditions, so in practice it does.

You know, unless.

Neato,
@Neato@kbin.social avatar

It does but only due to practicality.

Seismologist Susan Hough has suggested that a magnitude 10 quake may represent a very approximate upper limit for what the Earth's tectonic zones are capable of, which would be the result of the largest known continuous belt of faults rupturing together (along the Pacific coast of the Americas).[17] A research at the Tohoku University in Japan found that a magnitude 10 earthquake was theoretically possible if a combined 3,000 kilometres (1,900 mi) of faults from the Japan Trench to the Kuril–Kamchatka Trench ruptured together and moved by 60 metres (200 ft) (or if a similar large-scale rupture occurred elsewhere). Such an earthquake would cause ground motions for up to an hour, with tsunamis hitting shores while the ground is still shaking, and if this kind of earthquake occurred, it would probably be a 1-in-10,000-year event.[18]

So a 10 could be like, if California decides to finally go walkabout. Physically possible, but the sheer amount of movement a part of the crust would need to experience is very unlikely and therefore a scale measuring that or above isn't needed.

Opafi,

I even heard that nine-point-something is pretty much the limit because the rock just can’t store enough energy to go beyond ten, resulting in earthquakes before it hits that mark.

However, if you got the energy into the system from outside, it’s very possible to cross that line. The dinosaur asteroid supposedly resulted in a quake up to 11 on the Richter scale.

So… Is it likely? No. But the scale doesn’t end at 10.

rmuk,

But how will this affect the stock markets?

Kidplayer_666, in honesty is key

And don’t forget it’s logarithmic

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • science_memes@mander.xyz
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #