Hosting websites over 4g

I have been hosting a few websites from my home server and it has taught me a lot. I have recently had major issues with the electrical storms, Kogan NBN support (Australia), and the NBN network in general. I know 4g is not fast, but I would like to use it so that in the event of a network outage, im not at the mercy of NBN. On to the question!

I run pfsense in hyper v with a 4 port nic which passes through those ports to pfsense.

I realized that 4g ip addresses are not public, which stops me from hosting the websites.

Reading into wireguard and vpn services my plan is to:

  • Set up a VPS ✅
  • Set up wireguard on the VPS ✅
  • Create a wireguard connection on my windows server, and pass that in as an interface to pfsense, so that hopefully, I wont need to change to much on my internal infrastructure.

Does this sound like an OK plan? I’m open to any other ideas where I can achieve the following:

web app >> nginx >> pfsense >> vpn tunnel >> VPS with Public IP (can be dynamic)

Thanks!—

nis,

I’m using Headscale for something similar. I have a VPS and a server at home. Both are on the same Headscale network. On the home server I set up a Matrix server. On the VPS I set up Caddy as a reverse proxy for the home server with its Headscale IP. It works nicely.

I’m not on 4G, though.

sgh,

Have you looked into Cloudflare Tunnel? It’s a turnkey solution that does exactly what you want. No idea what the cost is though.

NeoNachtwaechter,

I know 4g is not fast, but I would like to use it

There was a time when people used to have 2400 bits per second from home (for the youngsters: that is 0.003M). So if you are doing it for fun, why not.

filcuk,

True, but everything is more bandwidth demanding these days, plus we’re used to fast loading.

nopersonalspace, (edited )

I mean I think it really depends on the type of website you’re trying to host. A static blog would use way less bandwidth than a media server for example. Traffic would have the same effect too, where 1 concurrent visitor to a blog would probably be fine but 10,000 would be a problem.

fuckwit_mcbumcrumble,

If you’re buying a VPS why not host the website there?

justawittyusername,

Good question, I will want to host more in the future, im trying to keep costs as low as possible.

taladar,

Depending on what you are trying to host and where you live power usage and your own hardware might be more expensive than the VPS you require to host those.

thirdBreakfast,

This. Hosting at home might be cheaper if you are serving a lot of data, but in that case, the speed’s going to kill you.

I’m a keen self-hoster, but my public facing websites are on a $4 VPS (Binary Lane - which I recommend since you’re in Aus). In addition to less hassle, you get faster speeds and (probably) better uptime.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • selfhosted@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #