@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

CosmicCleric

@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world

All posts/comments by me are licensed by CC BY-NC-SA 4.0.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

CosmicCleric, (edited )
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Yes, it does…

But you will see the event happen though.

Not with a binary search.

Yes you will.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Absolutely not true. Guy walks bye and shoots someone well offscreen. Momentary action with no visual cue before or after. Why are you arguing this useless point?

The person dropping to the ground dead would be the visual cue.

CosmicCleric, (edited )
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Ok but the text that you replied to, that you quoted, was “If the event lasts only a moment and leaves no visual cue (e.g. an assault), then binary search is practically useless.” Emphasis mine. If you’d started out saying “there’s ALWAYS a visual cue,” then you likely wouldn’t be getting dragged, but you started out arguing from this position without clarifying it, which makes it seem like you didn’t know what you were talking about.

Last time I checked, I’m allow to disagree with a comment someone made, and argue the opposite. Just because they say ‘no visual cue’ does not mean that is no visual cue.

You can’t say that you can simply look for visual cues when the other person specified that there were none.

Why, because you say so? Yes, I can. Of course I can.

Its called “disagreeing” with what the other person is speaking of, and countering. Its a discussion.

CosmicCleric, (edited )
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Yes, but, as you noted in an earlier post, that isn’t what you’re responding to.

I keep saying what I’m responding to, but you’re trying to change the narrative of what I’m responding, to as a debate tactic.

Someone uses a debate tactic of mentioning an “one off” and then directing their whole conversation to that one singular point is not intellectually honest in the whole conversation being had.

The fact that you’re wasting this much time trying to defend such a simple error is confusing. The reasonable response is, “oh, yes, in that particular case, binary search is ineffective.”

And you don’t think I can’t tell when a bot network is using what I’ve said back to me for training their AI, and then repeating it right back at me?

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Exactly.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Yes.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

If its all offscreen, then WTF are we bothing to talk about?

CosmicCleric, (edited )
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Do you.

You do you too, as well.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

but by telling them that you simply have to look for the cues from the hypothetical event that didn’t leave any.

And my point is that the DID leave a clue that a binary search would pick up on, the disappearance of the bike.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

If they don’t ratify it then it’s not a victory is it?

From the article…

The union is so far being mum on the details of the agreement, which will likely emerge in the next few days prior to the union’s ratification vote.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Once they finalize it and all everyone has signed, then they will release the details.

From the article…

The union is so far being mum on the details of the agreement, which will likely emerge in the next few days prior to the union’s ratification vote.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Why would I quote the part I’m not responding to?

You’re not being intellectually honest, because your response was to negate mine.

And, CNN broadcasted today, days early, what I was asking about.

I stand by what I’ve said.

CosmicCleric, (edited )
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Exactly, you’re looking to win an argument.

So you didn’t quote the part where I said I was just looking for clarification, and not attacking.

I’m really not trying to argue with you, so please don’t put intentions into my mouth that I didn’t have.

Again, that doesn’t mean announced or released by SAG-AFTRA.

Does it mean it’s not either. I’m making the assumption that they’re going to announce days beforehand so their base knows what they’re voting for.

The writer of the article is not a spokesperson for SAG-AFTRA.

Because writers never ask questions of spokespersons, either on or off the record, and get information that’s accurate that they would put in their story, right?

I mean, this is really blowing all out of intention/proportion. I was just trying to find out if you were some kind of insider who knew what you were speaking about, to learn something new and different about the subject being discussed. I wasn’t trying to publicly embarrass you, was just seeing that what you were saying was different than what the article was saying.

Edit: I just got the information I needed off of CNN, where they listed what was in the agreement.

Have a good day.

CosmicCleric, (edited )
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Sometimes someone will argue a technicality just to try to appear the smarter person. You’re just being a pedant at this point.

You’re making assumptions on my intentions without any actual knowledge of me as a person to base them on.

My life is not so minimal that I feel the need to prove my intelligence to strangers on the Internet. All I was looking for was social interaction and conversation (and in this case, clarification) which you know, is what Lemmy is supposed to be about.

And defending oneself is not being pedant.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

I’m really sick of bots in general.

I want to know I’m talking / arguing with a real human being, not a manufactured program just to incite my anger.

CosmicCleric,
@CosmicCleric@lemmy.world avatar

Boomers didn’t get that memo.

That’s why this Gen-Xer is telling him to remind his dad of that lesson.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #