@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Excrubulent

@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Memes. They hijack pop culture and turn it into a dogwhistle, like if you’ve seen people randomly saying “is that a jojos reference?” underneath some worryingly bigoted comment on youtube, they’re trying to indicate that they’re a fellow right wing asshole. For a long time “subscribe to pewdiepie” was used. Both references had some nazi connection, like jojos had a nazi character, and pewdiepie flirted with nazi stuff in a deniable way.

The point is that it’s silly and innocuous so that if anybody tries to call it out then they can just gaslight them and point out how silly it is, and they’re clearly making something out of nothing.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

“Gay coated” is just an amazing eggcorn that I have never heard before.

So eggcorns are misheard phrases that are then reinterpreted in a way that still makes sense in context, and that video makes the point that they’re not actually wrong, and sometimes they can compete with the original phrase.

The original term is “gay coded”, as in the creators have used commonly recognised “code” to signal that the characters are gay.

But I actually love the idea that they’re just slathered in the gay, just lubed up head to toe.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Never apologise for gay coating.

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

I’d say they’re different to bone apple tea because that’s a nonsense phrase whereas these could conceivably stand in for the original.

Eggcorn in particular has somewhat replaced acorn in a region of the US where those words sound the same, and the reason it’s not wrong is because it is a corn - a seed - and it does have an egg shape in it, so “eggcorn” is descriptively accurate.

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Did you kill them with a plunger?

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Oh I see it now. I’m obviously not up on my trolley problem lore.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Lies. The truly shameless do not confess.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Whemp, video doesn’t lie. I guess the first law of thermodynamics is wrong.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

This was the original concept for R2-PO.

Pirated video games SOURCE CODE

So there are multiple sites&groups that pirate video games especially on PC. I was wondering if there are places on the internet where you find source code for games especially the highly modifiable ones like Half Life 2/Portal and Skyrim. Or groups that crack into the source code of games (or even software in general), not only...

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

I was once at a talk by someone in that company and he straight up said that open sourcing it was a mistake. I assume because that meant they couldn’t sell us a thousand versions of it like Skyrim.

No word of whether its ongoing popularity was at all caused by open sourcing it.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

It botheres me that it’s -59% and not -69%.

It’s not because 69 is all that funny, but because it’s not very funny. It was a low effort joke that Elon dragged into the toilet and pissed all over, so it belongs in there with the rest of them.

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

“Fewer” is correct, but it’s wrong to correct “less” to “fewer”. Why? Because language isn’t dictated by an authority, it is negotiated through billions of interactions every day.

People say “less” to refer to countable objects and nobody is confused by it, so it is valid communication. Just because you had some English teacher mark you down for it in middle school doesn’t mean it’s wrong. You were just miseducated.

Even if we’re talking about strict technical semantics, 5 is less than 7. The < symbol is not called the “fewer than” symbol. “Less” can encompass the concept of “fewer”, so either is fine.

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Does it change its name to “fewer than” when it is used for whole numbers?

That’s rhetorical, we all know it doesn’t.

What I don’t understand is how you thought that that observation was meaningful in any way. I already said the concept of “less” encompasses “fewer”, so the “less than” symbol being used where “fewer” is also appropriate completely agrees with that idea, doesn’t it?

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

“Let me answer that question with an entirely nonsensical question and also downvote you like a petulant child.”

Useless. I can’t have a conversation with this.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Funnily enough I just got done with his video about the “nukes aren’t real” conspiracy theory. Of course that’s just one in his long Half Life Histories series which is mainly about the science and not conspiracies at all.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

You’re fucking the guy, he likes his name being said and it turns you off? How’d you get to that point? You don’t have a nickname? I don’t care if your name is Rumplestiltskin, if you want me to say your name I am making deep eye contact and saying it and I will mean it. I will moan it. Nothing is better than knowing what my partner wants so I can give it to them.

Normalise following orders like a good sub.

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar
Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Awww 🥰

Excrubulent, (edited )
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Your question relates to the effect of aerofoil shape on lift: www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/…/shape.html

Please note that in aerodynamics, “lift” is any aerodynamic force that acts perpendicular to the relative wind on an object, so it’s lift whether it pushes a plane up, down, left, right, or pushes a sailing boat across the wind.

Also the keel of the boat that keeps it sailing in a straight line is technically providing lift in the water, although that “lift” is sideways. Also it isn’t aerodynamic lift, but hydrodynamic. The general field is called fluid dynamics, which covers both gasses and liquids.

You’ve got some good answers, but the problem with the air bouncing idea is that it ignores the air on top of the wing, or to the leeward side of the sail. The sail is pushed on by the windward air, and pulled on by the leeward air. (Edit: technically not pulled on, but you can model it that way if you take atmospheric pressure as 0 and anything lower than that as negative; it will give you correct results)

This is such a common misconception that NASA has listed it as a common incorrect theory of lift: www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/…/wrong2.html

A better way to think about it is flow turning - as the wind moves past the sail, its flow is turned and the momentum change causes an equal and opposite change in momentum of the boat: www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/…/right2.html

So ideally the leading edge of the sail should be parallel to the oncoming wind, and the trailing edge will be by definition parallel to the outgoing wind. The difference in velocity between these two winds multiplied by the mass of air passing over them over time will give you the force acting on the sail.

If the leading edge isn’t parallel, the air’s transition from free flow into contact with the sail will not be smooth, and will cause losses that reduce the efficiency of the sail.

In practice, the way to achieve this parallel flow is to let out the sail until you see “luffing”, which is just the leading edge flapping a bit in the wind. Then you tighten it until the luffing disappears, at which point the sail should be correctly trimmed. As you carry on you can occasionally repeat this process to check that you’ve still got the right angle, as minor shifts in wind or boat direction can change the ideal angle of attack.

This is also called “setting” the sail. So when a ship “sets sail” it’s referring to the fact a skipper would order the crew to “set sails”, which would start them moving. Now the term also means to commence a voyage.

In some bigger boats you have strings called “telltales” on the surface of the sail. If you see them flapping you know the air flow is turbulent, and you can trim the sail until the telltales on both sides of the sail are blown into a smooth line along the sail. If you tighten the sail too much, the leeward telltales will flap. If you let it out it too much, the windward telltales will flap.

A flat surface is much less efficient as it will cause a lot more turbulence on the leeward side. A lot of work has been done to make sails form the most efficient shape, and they are always deliberately curved. The shape will change depending on the tightness of the sheet (the rope that sets the sail) and on its manufacture, but ultimately your sail shape was basically set when it was made. Different sail shapes will be optimised for different types of tack and different tasks, but I don’t know enough about that to explain more. Mainly I know that spinnakers are made for running downwind and the other sails usually have to make do for the rest of the situations, but this article tells you a lot more: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sail_components

I only just found that article, so if it disagrees with anything I’ve said here I’d defer to it.

Very high performance sails and setups can do some cool things, like racing catamarans with their very sleek hulls and optimised sails allow you to sail in a close haul within 30-something degrees of the wind, whereas most normal sailboats can’t get much closer than 45 degrees.

There is much more reading and interactive lessons on lift and other aerodynamics concepts on NASAs page here: www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/…/short.html

Edit: This seems like a decent resource for first time sailors, and gives some more in depth explanation of how to set your sails correctly: www.cruisingworld.com/learn-to-sail-101/

This is also where I learned what telltales are called. I’ve never sailed bigger boats much tbh.

Okay, I think that’s most of what I can info-dump on the basis of your question. You landed on an intersection of two of my special interests lol :)

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

No worries, like I said you hit on two of my special interests. Plus it was fun to pull out all my sailing jargon after all that time.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Thanks, I’ve learned a few new terms after going back and editing that, there’s a bit more detail in it now.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Thanks!

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

As I said elsewhere: that’s no longer a dark forest. The moment one civilisation speaks up, they all know they’re not alone. Then they’re in a different universe, one where there’s no longer a paradox because they’ve found each other.

Excrubulent,
@Excrubulent@slrpnk.net avatar

Maybe you could explain the idea then? No, I haven’t read that book.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #