GBU_28

@GBU_28@lemm.ee

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

GBU_28,

Are you suggesting crackheads have disposable income for hookers?

GBU_28,

You tell me

GBU_28,

KLR left leg, specialist

GBU_28,

Gold

GBU_28,

It’s not really a fuckup it’s like a fucksideways.

The kernel was safe, only feelings were hurt

GBU_28,

Bet that dude never ever fucked up a file open error again, and never broke the user space lol

GBU_28,

In 2012?

GBU_28, (edited )

Was the product impacted? Did Mauro get his commit together?

If the product was undamaged he was just rude. A fuckup means he hurt the mission, he hurt his goals

GBU_28, (edited )

Is/was there a lack of kernal devs?

They are literally interacting with the dudes life work, and apparently shitting on core rules. No surprise he got heated. It’s not just a job to that dude, it’s like he slapped his mother

All attacks were related.to the professional output (the code, and the ability to code)

GBU_28, (edited )

Did that demonstrably happen?

If there’s a surplus of talent (sounds like Mauro was dead weight) then at most he was just rude on Mauro’s way out the door.

I’m not saying it’s cool to be rude, but if it’s Linus’ review then you get what you get. To be butthurt about someone being rude to you should motivate you to learn your code interactions better. (In this case error handling)

GBU_28,

Who’s dying? None of this matters.

Yes or no was mauro being a fuckup or not? Simple as.

GBU_28, (edited )

Fear in the weak, those that can’t handle stern words.

Something line Kernel dev is not the space for fast and loose, and people need to be held accountable. Not coddled

And yeah, I’m making utility judgements based on Linus Torvalds. I’d say he has a pretty good eye for utility.

GBU_28,

The internet is not for the weak.

GBU_28,

U slow

GBU_28,

You’re typing on a device, on a recreational website. You made it, this is as good as it gets now

GBU_28,

It’s far side, not cute side

GBU_28, (edited )

Why mention cycling?

In that case it would be “drive one hour or cycle 4”

Do you mean to suggest the company should hire folks who live closer, period? That is more logical

The operative task is minimize commute.

In most cases a car would be the fastest commute, even if you live close. (Assuming a non hyper dense urban environment)

GBU_28, (edited )

Uhh fiber makes shits super fast and super clean

GBU_28, (edited )

I didn’t assume anything I took issue with moving variables from the outset.

Differing the range of travel in a question about the duration of travel is insanity. Then layering on a change of the mode of travel too…

GBU_28,

All well and fine, but they compared apples to oranges, by moving variables

GBU_28,

An actual comparison was simple.

“Imagine one employee lives an hour away, and one lives 20 minutes away”

GBU_28,

Huh? That’s the joke. American kids “never” do that either. Hence the face the friend is making in response to hearing it

GBU_28, (edited )

Apparently people think white kids do this but I never heard it growing up, so I guess it’s a generalization that my well informed but anecdotal experience doesn’t support

GBU_28, (edited )

So the suggestion would be to just declare that someone is perpetually wrong and misinformed and will never improve? Lol

Seems like dancing around the topic.

GBU_28,

“nope.”

Then I’m all good don’t care about the rest.

You aren’t different, you are just as susceptible to highway hypnosis or routine disruption as anyone else.

Cya

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #