Hazzia

@Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Hazzia,

Paying for the honor of either giving the government more money, or convincing them that they took too much and to give it back. But don’t worry, they’ll double check your work sometimes to make sure you gave them enough (fuck you if you gave them too much though). Oh, thinking “if they know how much I owed them anyway, why do I have to do this shit in the first place?” Fuck you, that’s why.

Hazzia, (edited )

But it’s only transmissible via consumption like mad cow disease, is that correct? If so, at the very least it shouldn’t become an epidemic, just very bad for the environment and deer jerky enthusiasts.

Edit: Nope, nvmd, I’m dumb. They said it’s really contagious and these prions can persist a long fucking time on surfaces. I’m gonna just never go outside again, thanks, I ain’t fucking with no prion disease.

Hazzia,

Thank you for your contribution to the betterment of society.

Hazzia,

Skip the castle and call the princess directly!

Walking Desk Is More Annoying Than A Standing Desk (hackaday.com)

I feel like there was a missed opportunity to use some of the spare computing power on the desk to add some helpful navigational autonomy. Like using a backward facing web camera for lane assist, obstacle avoidance, route following, etc. Could leverage something open source like Autoware.org to get most of the way there....

Hazzia,

Just get a wireless ethernet adapter (which exists and I loathe the fact that it does)

Hazzia,

I’m glad they picked a headline that can amuse me enough to distract me from how depressing the subject is.

Hazzia,

Alternatively, a white cis male with family money that he blew on crypto and NFTs and listens to Joe Rogan like it’s his religion.

Do you prefer PC or laptop? (freeonlinesurveys.com)

I was having a friendly discussion with someone this morning about PC and Laptops for work/education stuff, he suggested that I could use a chromebook for all this stuff and this would be a good idea and make things easier. I strongly disagreed with this, mainly because I hate laptops, the keyboard and touchpad make me angry and...

Hazzia,

Porqué no los dos?

But frfr I can’t imagine not having both. I’ve got enough power on my desktop to run modern games, do graphical rendering, run IDEs, and fuck around online pretty much simultaneously. Then I have a ThinkPad T14 for leaving the house to pretend I’m touching grass while actually just doing more developer shit.

Hazzia,

Also eastern US. This past Saturday was a what-should-be-nice 79F with a “real feel” reading of 103F. Absolutely insane.

I’m lucky to have ultra-effective AC window units, though I’ve been avoiding looking at my electric statements since summer started because… yikes…

I hope you get your AC back soon. As you mentioned, the humidity is a real killer right now.

Hazzia,

I like the not-so-subtle implication that your little brother is lesser to a dog.

Hazzia,

You know, I had Mozzerella that tasted strongly of soap before. I looked it up and apparently some chesses can start to do that after some variable amount of time due to some sort of chemical process. It would be worth checking if that cheese was supposed to taste like soap, or if it was going through the same issue I experienced.

If you’re wondering, yes I still ate it, like hell am I going to waste mozz that I paid for

Hazzia,

I can’t remember if it was a youtube video or a paper or an article or what, but I saw something explaining that, based on one interpretation of Einsteins equations, past the point of singularity, space and time invert. This would mean that the longer the black hole exists around in “our” universe (in absolute terms), the larger it becomes on the inside, and the larger it gets on the outside, the longer the inside universe would persist. I feel like you would have liked it, if only I could remember what it was. :(

The thing I saw postulated both that the universe would reuse the matter the black hole absorbed, and that there would be infinite branching universes since each would develop their own black holes, but then you have an issue with regards to running out of matter at some point. Though I guess that could be solved if you assume every black hole must converge at the end of their containing universe’s lifespan, and all matter would be reused in whatever blackhole absorbs the blackhole containing that parent universe? Oh hey, we’re back to fractals again!

Personally I’m a fan of the idea of black holes as topological stars that fall in line with string theory, but there have been so many hypothetical frameworks coming out in recent years that are just fascinating to think about.

Hazzia, (edited )

I think the only reason those specifically are most well known, is because they capture popular imagination.

Basically, because it’s impossible to see inside black holes to know what’s going on, there’s very few ways to validate ideas. Therefore, outside of a select number of external observational techniques (like radio signals and gravitational waves) to place some limitations, ideas about what happens beyons the event horizon are in the realm of pure math, which people don’t care about unless it either A. Verifiable, or B. Just sounds really cool.

Black Hole hypotheses therefore tend to go one of a few ways:

Scenario 1

Scientist A: Hey if you use this math, black holes can do this thing

Scientist B: That requires this other thing which isn’t true, to be true, and/or breaks this fundamental law

Scientist A: This hypothesis is my precious brain baby and if you talk shit about it I will shatter your knees

Scenario 2

Scientist A: Hey if you use this math, black holes can do this thing

Scientist B: That requires an assumption we can’t, or have yet to, verify is true (almost always somehow related to string theory)

Scientist A: This hypothesis is my precious brain baby and if you talk shit about it I will shatter your knees

Scenario 3:

Scientist A: Hey if you use this math, black holes can do this thing

Scientist B: Okay the math checks out as one of X number of possibilities with that same math, but there’s know way to tell which, if any of these would be true (equations with multiple valid solutions, almost always related to spacetime topology)

Scientist A: Heehee numbers do funni

ETA: The specific subcategories of hypotheses you mentioned also have an inherent advantage of not having to deal with singularities. Why that’s good: Einstein’s theories say infinite density impossible. With singularity, can’t connect quantum theory to relativity theory. No quantum gravity make math bb’s big sad. Solution? Instead of squoosh matter really tiny, just send it somewhere else! They aren’t the only frameworks that avoid singularities, but definitely the coolest sounding and least complicated

Hazzia,

They hate to admit it, and it’s definitely less in-your-face most of the time because of the expected formality of the scientific community, but physicists, and specifically those trying to make advancements like we see around black holes, are SUPER arrogant. For the first 2 scenarios listed, they usually only make a formal paper out of the discovery to later defend the drawback as something they can “work around”. Either by “oh we’ll definitely eventually figure out how to emperically verify this haha. Look how well it works, you’d be crazy not to believe in this”, or the more extreme “This obviously constitutes a whole rewrite of our understanding of physics because my solution is so elegant except for the parts where it literally doesn’t work”

That last one is less prone to arrogance because topology is working with an insane amount of unverifiable possibilities already, so they don’t really tend to get too attached to any given solution.

Hazzia,

I get the objective need for the /s in this particular context, but we absolutely should add “using /s when the sarcasm should be obvious for anyone with basic reading comprehension skills” to the list

snazzy0933, to asklemmy

What are some tips for dealing with solicitors (door-to-door salespeople)? Our neighborhood gets a lot of them.

We have a “No solicitors” sign hanging on the front door. Nevertheless, they knock, ring the doorbell, or worse, yell through the front window when it is open, trying to get our attention.

We have a Ring video doorbell and have enabled the automatic “Sorry, we’re not interested” announcement after 15 seconds. These pushy SOBs ignore the sign and the announcement.

When I ultimately find out they are soliciting and I ask why they ignored both the sign and the doorbell announcement, they usually say something like, “I’m not selling anything. I am just working with some people in the neighborhood…” or some such BS.

My wife and I work from home and have had to explain the window shouting to coworkers in meetings. We also have two small children who could be trying to nap at any given time. We have good reasons to not want to be disturbed at home and these assholes disregard that wish.

I will write a negative review online if I find out their name and company they are representing. Any other ways to get these people to leave us alone?

Hazzia, (edited )

This is the only real, good answer I’ve seen so far.

Don’t have a lawn? Doesn’t matter, install one on your stoop exclusively for solicotors.

Live in an apartnemnt building? Instead of a sprinkler, comission someone to shamble together a remote controlled squirt gun. Bonus points if it’s on an aimable mount.

If you want to go an extra mile, somehow add vinegar into the mix. The possibilities are endless.

Hazzia,

This wouldn’t work if it’s different people each time. That kind of deterrent requires the solicitor to already try once, but OP makes it sound like a rotating door of people

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #