Ilovethebomb

@Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Ilovethebomb,

Most of the sub compact stuff is just rebranded M12 gear, for example. Not everything is the same, but a lot is.

Ilovethebomb,

Yes, Festool do one for their sanders. A battery tool is usually more expensive and less powerful than a mains powered tool though, so I’m not sure what the advantage of this would be.

Ilovethebomb,

A bizarre number of them are about Taylor Swift though.

Ilovethebomb,

Even if it was just a problem you made and you fixed but nothing actually changes.

Isn’t this half of what some IT people do?

Ilovethebomb,

I imagine saying those people are fictional characters would make some people angry.

Ilovethebomb,

What’s your point here, exactly?

Ilovethebomb,

There’s a difference between getting inspiration from something, and downright stealing it.

Ilovethebomb,

Meaning you can freely reproduce the original work, but you cannot create a new piece of work using the original characters.

Meaning, in the case of Winnie the Pooh, the original books and associated works are free to be used and shared, but you could not create a new book or comic without the permission of the estate of AA milne.

Ilovethebomb,

Interesting angle.

Ilovethebomb,

I really don’t think this is a difficult concept to grasp, to be honest.

The original work becomes public domain, and can be freely reproduced.

The characters therein are, and remain, the property of the author’s estate, and cannot be used in new work without their permission.

We are already seeing this in the real world, where Disney cartoons are public domain, but the characters, having been used in consecutive works, cannot be used by anyone other than them.

This allows a published work to be used for generations to come, but doesn’t allow an author’s legacy to be tarnished by less than quality adaptations.

Ilovethebomb,

The alphabet is free and open source.

Ilovethebomb,

Mostly seeing the appalling job some people have done adapting a former beloved character, or the inevitable NSFW adaptations.

Imagine someone writing a story where, for example, Christopher Robin kills someone, and profiting from it? Would you be happy having your childhood memories of reading Winnie the Pooh tainted like that?

Ilovethebomb,

Putin hasn’t been looking very healthy at all lately, I hope it’s him.

Ilovethebomb,

You pay tax on profits, so revenue less expenses, just like any business or investment. I’m honestly not sure what your point is here.

Ilovethebomb,

This is fault finding 101 for fire alarm systems.

Ilovethebomb,

It takes at least a month to get past the itchy and scraggly stage into something dignified.

Ilovethebomb,

That’s not as bad as I thought, to be honest.

Ilovethebomb,

They’re supposed to be like that though, especially Tony Stark, it’s part of their character arc. With Captain Marvel, it feels like she was supposed to be likeable, but it didn’t work out.

Ilovethebomb,

This really is a brilliant comic. One panel, no text, and a tragic story anyone can empathise with.

Ilovethebomb,

It’s actually funny how mad people get about YouTube ads.

Ilovethebomb,

Probably still ongoing, it’s not a fast process typically.

Ilovethebomb,

I rather think you’re missing the point.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #