MostlyHarmless

@MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

MostlyHarmless,

It’s JSX. It’s used to embed markup into javascript

What is Something Scientific that you just don't believe in at all?

EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something...

MostlyHarmless,

No they didn’t. They had their own moon program and announced their intentions to land in 1961 before the Americans announced in 1962

…m.wikipedia.org/…/Soviet_crewed_lunar_programs

MostlyHarmless,

I don’t understand what you are saying. They had a moon landing program.

Also, do you really think that if the Soviets had the opportunity to embarrass the Americans by proving the landing was fake, they wouldn’t take it? Of course they would. Instead they were able to track the Apollo mission all the way and knew it was real.

MostlyHarmless,

Even if the Soviets had given up on the space race, they still had a vested interest in embarrassing America. They had every motivation to prove that America faked it, but they didn’t do it, because they had all the evidence that it was real. They could track the space craft and listen in on the same signals everyone else did.

All documentation against the moon landing has been thoroughly debunked many times. But you don’t care about that.

You don’t have to trust the Americans, there is plenty of independent third party evidence from multiple sources

…wikipedia.org/…/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_…

MostlyHarmless,

The English equivalent would be "You’ll be fine son, but if it doesn’t work out, Jim’ll Fix It "

MostlyHarmless,

The heat released into the atmosphere has to go somewhere. The only place it can go is to be radiated into space

MostlyHarmless,

What do you base that on?

Spacex has had zero successful missions to Mars. NASA has landed 5 rovers.

MostlyHarmless,

Of course my comment is false equivalence, because the initial assertion is false equivalence.

You can’t compare NASA and Spacex because they have different goals. NASA even contract many of their payloads to Spacex, which they wouldn’t do if they were in the same business.

MostlyHarmless,

I like to wear a smart watch that looks like a regular watch. I have a Withings. It does basic notifications, has the usual health functionality such as heart rate, workouts etc. But the battery lasts a few weeks between charges.

MostlyHarmless,

Because it isn’t a subsystem of Linux. It is a subsystem in Windows that allows Linux to run as part of Windows.

The windows subsystem gives Linux access to the Windows system.

MostlyHarmless,

It is a subsystem of Windows that Linux runs in. It’s not a subsystem of Linux.

Windows is the system. It’s the host operating system. It created a subsystem specifically for running a child operating system. In this case, Linux

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #