@Stamets@startrek.website
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Stamets

@Stamets@startrek.website

30s. Gay. Star Trek lover.

I post using Boost for Lemmy! Also on Mastodon!

Alt account of https://lemmy.world/u/Stamets.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Nope. But thanks <3

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Yes. Granted not due to being a white educated man so much as a human who doesn’t have loads of money or influence. At least in 1923 you didn’t have every corporation trying to micromanage your life and life was affordable.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

And I think you underestimate how much my life sucks.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

I’m 31 and I do. I’d rather be dead.

Stamets, (edited )
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Well, I mean that’s a lie. “Good intentions don’t make rocket fuel.” The first rocket that was ever designed was designed specifically to go to space. It was used in WW2 by the Nazis but its creator said “The rocket worked perfectly, but it fell on the wrong planet.” Those good intentions are needed for every step of space exploration. You don’t get to suddenly become a rampant narcissistic, misogynistic, arrogant piece of human garbage the second that you clear the gravity well of your home planet. You hold true to those purposes because they will inform your every decision. If you start doing horrible things in the pursuit of a lofty goal, you corrupt that goal and all actions you take in the future. You will be looking through things in a dirtied, bloodied lens. Or, as someone once put it far better…

“You cannot explain away a wantonly immoral act because you think that it is connected to some higher purpose.” - Captain Jean-Luc Picard

Whether you do good things or bad things is who you are. If you start taking terrible actions then you become a terrible person. Or, as the man again once said…

“It’s our morality that defines us. It’s part of the truth of our existence.”

Then there’s the fact that Elon constantly shits on everyone below him. Guess what? There’s a few quotes for that too. Here are my favorites.

“No being is so important that he can usurp the rights of another.”

“You know, there are some words I’ve known since I was a schoolboy. “With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably.” Those words were uttered by Judge Aaron Satie as wisdom and warning. The first time any man’s freedom is trodden on, we’re all damaged.”

Or what about this interaction between Worf and Picard?

Picard: We think we’ve come so far. Torture of heretics, burning of witches, is all ancient history. Then, before you can blink an eye, suddenly, it threatens to start all over again.

Worf: I believed her. I… helped her. I did not see her for what she was.

Picard: Mr. Worf, villains who twirl their moustache are easy to spot. Those who clothe themselves in good deeds are well-camouflaged.

Worf: I think… after yesterday people will not be so ready to trust her.

Picard: Maybe. But she, or someone like her, will always be with us. Waiting for the right climate in which to flourish, spreading fear in the name of righteousness. […] Vigilance, Mr. Worf. That is the price we must continually pay.

Now lemme top all this ramble off with one final slightly edited quote to cement my point.

The first duty of every Star Trek fan is to the truth, whether it’s scientific truth or historical truth or personal truth! It is the guiding principle on which Starfleet is based! If you can’t find it within yourself to stand up and tell the truth about what happened, you don’t deserve to wear that cosplay.

Stamets, (edited )
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

I’m sorry but that entire blog post is complete garbage and not worth even remotely paying attention to.

The majority of it is whining that Wil promoted a blocklist on twitter. That blocklist was originally made to block trolls and stuff but it ran out of support. One of the people working on it pushed their own which Wil supported. What Wil didn’t know, and what many other people who were sharing the tool has no idea about, was that the user had introduced personal blocks into that list and used it as their own thing to go trans people they had beef with. Wil openly admitted to not knowing this and trying to fix the problem in his own blocklist. The article then seems to bash Wil repeatedly for this fact while leaning on “Well he didn’t share the tools enough to fix the problem!” as the sole reason why Wil should be shamed for this mistake. He made a mistake. He was not actively targeting trans people or bashing them. Framing it that he was is the most disingenuous bullshit I can think of.

“However, the most recent dust-up with Wheaton wasn’t about trans specific issues at all but over his friendship with Chris Hardwick.” Also not a remotely valid complaint as the accusations against Chris Hardwick were made by one woman, was investigated, and found to be demonstrably false. I’m not about to shame Wil for being friends with someone who didn’t do anything wrong. So much so that I’m going to quote Wil Wheaton himself on that debacle because I refuse to put anymore effort into it.

I’m not going to apologize to people who were let down by me, because I waited for the facts to come in instead of rushing to join their angry mob. Chris was investigated multiple times and cleared of every accusation, by all of them. And that’s still not good enough for some people, who I also will not apologize to. If ANYTHING his accuser said were true, we wouldn’t be having this conversation. Because fundamental values matter. I am not and will not be friends with someone who sexually assaults another person or any of the other things she lied about, and I’m insulted that you think I would be.

Let me be really clear about this: she didn’t exaggerate. She didn’t take things out of context. She straight up LIED. She made things up that aren’t true. She lied about multiple events that I and others witnessed. And there is so much more you don’t know about, because it was never made public. So I didn’t make a friendship exception, because there was no friendship exception to be made. After the facts came in, I stood with and supported my friend who didn’t do any of the things he was accused of doing. I stood by my friend who was cleared multiple times by multiple investigations. I stood by my friend who I had LONG and DIFFICULT conversations with, as I went through every single accusation with him, in my personal effort to get to the truth.

I know there are people who just don’t want to hear this, because they would possibly feel bad about being part of that angry mob, but that doesn’t make it less true: Chris was in a toxic relationship that was unhealthy and horrible. I had a front row seat to it. They were TERRIBLE together. They fought all the time. They brought out the absolute worst in each other. It was awful. All of that is true. And none of the things she said about him in her essay happened. That is also true. She made it all up, because, in her own words, she couldn’t let him “win” when they broke up, whatever the fuck that meant.

I’ve given you a lot more of my time than I wanted to. I’m just real sick and tired of this lie about Chris going unchallenged by people who paid attention to the lie and then either ignored or rejected the truth when that truth came out.

So to recap: Wil Wheaton is “problematic” for making a genuine mistake and for backing up his friend who did nothing wrong.

Yeah. Doesn’t seem that problematic to me.

Stamets, (edited )
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Oh 100%. He’s a delightful man. Still so frustrated at the people who made him quit Twitter ages ago with the constant “Shut up Wesley” shit.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

To be fair they wanted to execute a child for tripping. Fuck the Prime Directive in that case and fuck that planet. There should very much be a clause for protecting your own citizens provided they’re literal children.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Well, no, it must be left in because if you stick with your part of “every crazy request” then it completely ignores the entire spirit and purpose of the Prime Directive. Starfleet isn’t the be all and end all of morality. Their decisions affect them and the people within it but they’re not “Team America: Space Police.” They don’t go around judging which laws are good and which aren’t. ESPECIALLY when that perspective comes from them and them alone. Different cultures have different beliefs. Ignoring them and imposing your own on everyone is imperalistic as hell and directly against what Starfleet stands for.

Adding a clause to children works for me because the only purpose is to protect the children. The Prime Directive is still able to stand and work between cultures but this way Starfleet is able to say “Our cultures matter too and our culture says children whos brains aren’t done developing shouldn’t be executed for a mistake.” Sure it’s still fucked up that they’d do it to adults but they’re adults. They made their decision and their decision led to them doing stupid shit on an alien planet, fucking around and finding out.

Stamets, (edited )
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

If you want to make a point you can do so without needing to bash newer Treks for absolutely no reason. Just tired of this petty behavior. I’m out. I’ve got no time for this nonsense.

Stamets, (edited )
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Okay but he’s also a twice impeached rapist who actively made fun of disabled folks, trampled on the rights of everyone, and actively talks about attacking American democracy

So… Cut his shit.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

I appreciate it but i’ve barely been posting lately. So many other people deserve so many more props

deleted_by_author

    •
    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    Sorry I was busy!

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    Hell yeah. Then we must figure out a time

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    I think it was more meant in the sense that the voice of Agimus and Shran are remarkably similar not just due to the same person voicing them but also a lot of inflection/speaking style.

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    I was watching Lower Decks with a friend a couple days ago and somehow just before the episode repeat guests had been brought up. When I realized it was the Agimus/PeanutHamper episode I started giggling. He already knew Agimus but somehow hadn’t clicked that it was Combs voicing him. To be fair I didn’t either until that episode. When I told him he couldn’t stop laughing during the whole ass episode saying “Oh my god it’s just Shran!”

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    And I’m cackling with laughter

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    I know I have this saved, not sure if I ever posted it, but even if it was done, who cares? 2.22k posts. Not everyones going to have seen all of 'em. STAR TREK BABY! BRING IT!

    Also I just love this because I can really imagine Marina coming out of Troi and backhanding Riker for that.

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    I will continue to sit. My knees hurt.

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    Same, friend. Same lol

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    I have invested in so much Mentholatum…

    Stamets,
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    Hey. Sorry. Dealin with stress myself so this comment sucks but I love your work and am really glad to see you on Lemmy.

    Stamets, (edited )
    @Stamets@startrek.website avatar

    Best holiday movie of all time. Next to Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Love me some Gay Perry. That was a true gay icon.

    Fuck now I gotta watch Love, Actually.

    Am I hallucinating or did they make a sequel or something recently?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #