@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

TSG_Asmodeus

@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

I thought it was First Encounter Assault Recon.

TSG_Asmodeus, (edited )
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Meme: Use this gun to sneak a snickers into a movie theatre.

Title: (you could also say) You could also sneak peanuts into a school. (EDIT: Sorry I misunderstood the confusing part. In some schools in the US you cannot bring in peanuts due to some people having an anaphylactic shock when around peanuts.)

Google Researchers’ Attack Prompts ChatGPT to Reveal Its Training Data (www.404media.co)

ChatGPT is full of sensitive private information and spits out verbatim text from CNN, Goodreads, WordPress blogs, fandom wikis, Terms of Service agreements, Stack Overflow source code, Wikipedia pages, news blogs, random internet comments, and much more....

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

What are we gonna do now? Give it to people that weren’t alive back then?

Yes.

TSG_Asmodeus, (edited )
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Ok, so I steal your dads car. Years later, he dies, and they find me with the car. Well your dad is dead, so it’s my car now right?

EDIT:

To all the replies, what’s the cutoff? It sure seems to conveniently be the one where we keep everything and everyone else is fucked.

Should we give Japanese American/Canadian families back the houses and land they lost when they were interred? Why or why not?

If a car doesn’t count, but raw land does, what’s to stop the government from taking your house? They have the might, laws governing seizing of land is old, so fuck it, why follow it? Is that ok because they have the might?

If the actions of those ‘hundreds of years ago’ no longer apply, do Americans lose their constitutional rights? What exactly makes something ‘too far in the past’ to have actions done with it? Canadians got the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, is that old enough to break, or too new? What is the line in time, exactly?

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

See, it gets complicated.

Apparently we just do fuck-all because it’s ‘too complicated’ from what I’m reading here; seems pretty cut and dry. Follow treaties people in the past signed? Nah, why bother. It’s in the past. I mean honestly, what rules should we even bother following from back then.

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Also, following treaties signed under duress and in situations of radically unequally power dynamics isn’t too reasonable either.

I’m not sure the alternative to following treaties signed under duress is to not even follow said treaties. We can give them all sorts of land that we barely use, nobody is actually suggesting we give them back downtown Vancouver. The issue is we just shrug and go ‘yeah well people live in places now’.

Are there r/WorldNews Israel bots or am I hallucinating

I just noticed that there are quite a few users on Reddit from r/WorldNews who are defending Israel unequivocally and when I checked some of the users they seemed to be engaging on topics only about Israel/Palestine and they seem to be extremely active, so I have checked the Internet and there are even some older BBC article and...

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

I just noticed that there are quite a few users on Reddit from r/WorldNews who are defending Israel unequivocally

They’re here too, and one of them is a mod of quite a few communities.

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

Dredd 2012. Judge Dredd takes on a female apprentice Anderson for a training day. They mop the floor with gangsters and crooked cops. It’s a non-stop action thrill ride.

I absolutely love the part when Dredd is extremely injured and basically walking wounded, Anderson saves him from being executed, and it’s the perfect time for the Hollywood ‘Anderson nurses Dredd back from near death.’

But what happens? Dredd just field dresses himself, and it’s not romantic, at all. She literally covers him while he does it, and then they move on.

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

First of all. Are there any stories without sex/romance?

Alien and Aliens stand out, and as the poster below said, Dredd as well.

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

The fact that you seem to not have seen this before indicates that you cannot actually always contract ‘you’ and ‘are’.

I’m still re-reading this sentence. How does not having seen this before indicate what you can or can not do?

TSG_Asmodeus,
@TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world avatar

The fact that you seem to not have seen this before indicates that you cannot actually always contract ‘you’ and ‘are’.

This is the line I am referring to, not any specific word. This sentence is nonsensical:

“The fact you seem to not have seen this before indicates…” followed by “that you cannot always contract ‘you’ and ‘are.’”

How are those related? If someone hasn’t seen this before… it indicates … grammar rules? How does not seeing it indicate a grammar rule?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #