TheGrandNagus

@TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

Getting it done as an adult is fine. You consented. I’m also fine with piercings or tattoos on adults but not on babies for the same reason. Though that’s a bit of a false equivalence as genital mutilation is more dangerous and less reversible than those other two, so I guess I find them less objectionable, though still fucked up.

Getting it done out of medical necessity is also fine, for pretty obvious reasons.

Forcing it upon a baby for no reason isn’t.

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

Because he’s A) talking nonsense, and B) making genital mutilation of babies sound like it’s not that bad.

You want part of your dick cut off? Cool. Do it when you’re old enough to consent to it. Genuinely. If that’s what floats your boat, then do it. People should have the right to body autonomy. Slice your ear off as well if that’s what you’re into. Anything.

If this were about tattooing babies, or piercing them, or cutting off their earlobes, everyone would rightly be against it (even though all of these are less dangerous and less likely to have complications).

It’s only because Americans, Jews, and Muslims are used to this practice that they accept it. If it were a new thing, it would be seen as the barbaric practice that it truly is.

I believe there’s also the element of “well if I admit that circumcision of babies is wrong, that means there’s something wrong with my penis. And I don’t want there to be something wrong with my penis. Therefore I’m on the side of genital mutilation being ok.”

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

It affecting sensitivity is not a rumour, it’s a fact. There are nerve endings in the foreskin. Ergo, it must remove sensitivity. And this can be corroborated by many who get the procedure done as adults.

And the “way cleaner” thing makes zero sense unless you don’t have access to running water. The world outside of the US + Middle East aren’t walking around with dirty dicks, and if you don’t have running water, all of you will be dirty regardless.

There are babies in the US that die each year from circumcision complications. It causes pain. It reduces sensitivity. Plenty of them are done "traditionally’ - i.e. without any pain relief or sterilisation. It leaves scars. 5% of circumcisions are botched, sometimes causing pain and discomfort - particularly during sex - for the man’s whole lifetime.

It’s completely unnecessary, and barbaric.

The fact that we’re in 2024 and there’s still places out there cutting parts of the dick off of babies as a religious or quasi-religious (in the case of the US) ceremony is crazy.

TheGrandNagus,

It really is a slippery slope. When does it end???

It ends when you open vim. There’s no escape.

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

I dunno, it sounds awfully defensive to me. It wasn’t meant to hurt you, it’s just a discussion about software packaging. There’s no personal attacks here.

I did read your comments, and despite trying to change the topic, create strawmen, and shout ad-hominems, it doesn’t change the fact that it’s reasonable to say Debian packages are often very, very old and outdated. Because they are.

That may not be an issue for you, but it is for many.

You shouldn’t let that make you upset, it doesn’t invalidate your use-case.

TheGrandNagus,

You say “resorting” like using flatpak is awful

TheGrandNagus,

I didn’t ignore anything.

And you don’t need to be so defensive. Nobody said Debian is bad or that you can’t use it to make money, just that it being severely outdated can be an issue, and it can. Flatpak helps, but it doesn’t completely fix it.

My comment wasn’t meant to hurt your feelings.

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

Yeah. And if it works for you, it’s good. I have a headless Debian home server running in my house right now.

I’m just saying it’s completely valid to not be into Debian because the packages are ancient, just as it’s also completely valid to not be into Arch because the packages are too bleeding edge.

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

It’s not just noobs that appreciate flatpak. Flatpak is good all-round.

And the problem of Debian packages being old is very much not imaginary lol. Debian has only just moved beyond Gnome 3.38/Plasma 5.20/kernel version 5.10.

That’s ancient. And that’s not to mention the other software repos, which are often updated at an even slower pace.

Don’t assume that just because you want extremely outdated packages, everyone else must want the same.

TheGrandNagus,

Now you’re just talking absolute gobbledegook.

TheGrandNagus, (edited )
  • Proprietary on the server/distribution end
  • Controlled 100% by Canonical
  • Worse performance, particularly in terms of app startup times
  • Snaps are mounted as separate filesystems, so it can make things look cluttered in your file explorer or when you’re listing stuff with lsblk
  • Canonical often forces users to use Snaps even when users have explicitly tried to install with apt. e.g. you run sudo apt install firefox and it installs a Snap
  • It hasn’t gained traction with other distros like Flatpak has, and Canonical’s insistence on backing the “wrong” standard means Linux will continue to be more fragmented than it would be if they also went along with what has become the de facto standard

There are however benefits of snaps. It works for better for terminal programs, and Canonical can even package system stuff like the kernel as a snap - as you can imagine, this might be a very powerful tool when it comes to an immutable version of Ubuntu.

TheGrandNagus,

There’s a misunderstanding here. What we mean is that the Snap system itself is proprietary. The server side is proprietary and there’s no way to add repos other than Canonical’s.

Flatpak is open, and anybody can create/add a remote.

Both can be used to package and distribute proprietary software. But the same could be said of .deb or .rpm

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

Debian is one of the distros where flatpaks are most appropriate lol, it’s the best way to not have programs that are really old

Adding weird third party repositories that can cause all kinds of issues probably isn’t the best idea

TheGrandNagus,

So? The AMD subreddit is larger than either Nvidia’s or Intel’s (in the case of Intel, by a lot). Both of them have a greater market share than AMD in their respective markets.

Porsche has over double the subs of Toyota, yet Toyota sells 33x the amount of cars.

Subs means zero.

(Constructively) What is your least favorite distro & why?

I’ve been distrohopping for a while now, and eventually I landed on Arch. Part of the reason I have stuck with it is I think I had a balanced introduction, since I was exposed to both praise and criticism. We often discuss our favorite distros, but I think it’s equally important to talk about the ones that didn’t quite hit...

TheGrandNagus,

People dislike it because:

  • There’s no real reason to use it over Arch/EndeavourOS
  • Their holding back of updates for 2 weeks is stupid and can cause breakage/dependency issues when you also have stuff installed via AUR (which doesn’t get held back for 2 weeks)
  • They hold back packages for 2 weeks, citing stability and that they can check for issues then patch before they push, but then they just… don’t do that. Known issues still get pushed.
  • Manjaro repos have had issues with malware in the past
  • Manjaro has on multiple occasions had their SSL certificates expire, with their advertised “fix” being to roll your system time back. This is a job that can be automated, or at the very least should have a reminder for someone in Manjaro to sort out. The fact it happened once is an embarrassment, but the fact it’s happened more times is absolutely inexcusable.

"Must Try" distros and DEs?

Hey folks! I’m getting a fresh laptop for the first time in about a decade (Framework 16) in a couple of months and am looking forward to doing some low-level tinkering both on the OS and hardware. I’m planning to convert into a “cyberdeck” with quick-release hinges for the screen since I usually use an HMD, built-in...

TheGrandNagus,

I genuinely don’t know whether this comment is a joke or not

TheGrandNagus,

“yes, I do believe that there could be arguments to sway my opinion towards genocide.”

Wow.

TheGrandNagus,

Desktop: don’t care, keyboard is standardised

Laptop: less-used keys can be different sized or in different positions. I want that shit backlit so I can find where they’ve shifted those keys to

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

Yes, you can turn them all off…

…if you install 3 different resource-hogging, data-harvesting RGB lighting control programs on your PC and have them run at startup.

I’m not that pissed off about RGB. But it should be off by default.

White by default would be ok in theory, but in reality they all vary in brightness and colour temperature, so that looks jarring too.

E: lmao ok people, simp for the corporations

TheGrandNagus,

The problem is that each part manufacturer wants you to install their shitty RGB control software that is often bizarrely resource-hogging, and sometimes even used for data gathering.

On laptops, some RGB control software can eat your battery away by a fair bit because the CPU never goes into a lower power state.

RBG should A) all conform to a standardised open API, and B) be off by default.

TheGrandNagus,

Nah I don’t have telegram, must’ve been somebody else I’m afraid :)

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

It’s worse because she’s telepathic - she knows the advances are unwanted and makes people uncomfortable, and yet she does it anyway.

On top of that, she’s a very important Federation ambassador. People might feel pressured into keeping her happy.

I have a feeling that if she were of a different sex people would view her relentless unwanted sexual advances quite differently.

But I guess “man trying to avoid sexual advances of horny older woman” was seen as being a hilarious role reversal on 90s TV.

She did have some amazing scenes though. She can certainly act when she gets a serious scene as opposed to a sex pest scene.

TheGrandNagus, (edited )

I think Gnome is great. The workflow is amazing imo, better than a clunky Windows-inspired UX, and it’s nice to have a distro I can depend on being bug free without it being a project that moves too slowly.

And those trackpad gestures. Man. They make even Apple’s trackpad gestures feel like you’re using a £300 Acer laptop.

It’s also nice to have a desktop that actually gives a shit about UX, distraction-free computing, and consistency. It’s nice to have a desktop that encourages great third party apps that integrate well with the system and follow excellent design guidelines. It’s nice to have a DE team that are ballsy enough to go against the Win95 UX paradigm and does its own thing, despite knowing they’ll get extreme amounts of hate for it.

Just because it’s not your cup of tea doesn’t mean it’s a dumpster fire or they hate their users and are doing a circlejerk.

We don’t struggle with the idea of “Arch is too bleeding edge for me, so I won’t use it, but cool project nonetheless” or “Debian is too outdated for me, so I won’t use it, but cool project nonetheless”, so what is it about DEs - or tbh more accurately, Gnome specifically - that has people being like “this isn’t what I want, therefore it’s a piece of SHIT. Why do they hate their users? Why do the users use it? Don’t they realise the devs hate them??”

This elitist, tribal mentality is one of the worst parts about the Linux community, and is, ironically, a circlejerk of its own.

/rant

TheGrandNagus,

TL;DR: they’re pretty much exactly the same

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #