Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Thorry84, to memes in Betrayal of the highest order
Thorry84, to programmer_humor in “It’s not that hard”

Yes the compiler/interpreter can figure it out on the fly, that’s what we mean by untyped languages. And as stated both have their merits and their faults.

Elon doesn’t know what the words mean and just chimes in with his AI future BS.

Thorry84, to memes in New email from test@scam.com

Sure let me go tell Microsoft

Thorry84, (edited ) to memes in New email from test@scam.com

They don’t tell us they are testing, it’s done at random. Reporting is policy, it needs to be done with every phishing mail that gets past the filters. It’s one of the big ways a company is vulnerable, an employee clicks on a link in a mail, opens something they shouldn’t and before you know it there’s been a databreach. I don’t think they are especially worried about the employee leaking his personal info, they are worried about targeted attacks and corporate espionage.

I’m sure there are a lot of false positives. Even though I work in a technical company, we have plenty of people who aren’t as handy with tech. People get training regularly and if one person reports a lot of useless I’m sure they will train that person extra. I think for a lot of people except maybe sales something like 80% of all mail is internal. And the other part is probably 50% repeating automated mails. So the number of mails that could even be phishing are limited. It’s a mid sized company with about 1000 employees.

Thorry84, (edited ) to memes in New email from test@scam.com

The IT people send out the phishing mail themselves as part of a test. It isn’t an actual phishing mail, just something made to look and act like one. In the end they have a report which people fell for it, which ignored it (or were ooo) and which reported it.

Reporting is done via the report phishing feature in Outlook. For consumers it’s sent to Microsoft, but for businesses you can configure those reports to do what you want. It’s actually a really good feature and people should always use it.

Thorry84, to risa in Do-Re-Mi-Go-oW-Ron

Holding your bat’leths like that won’t bring honor to your house!

Thorry84, to memes in New email from test@scam.com

Where I work you only pass the test if you report it to IT, otherwise it’s 3 hours of training with the rest of the idiots.

Thorry84, to risa in Sorry Ezri

I really like Nicole, but I had a huge crush on Terry when DS9 first aired, so it’s hard to decide.

Thorry84, to upliftingnews in ‘Amazing’: Queensland mum uses electric car to ‘save’ son’s life with dialysis during power outage

I have a gas powered car, it has a mains outlet in the back of the center console. As far as I know this isn’t anything special or new. My car is a 2016 Chevy nothing special.

Thorry84, to lemmyshitpost in If only it was like that

Are you saying global warming is actually caused by the bias of IGN reviewers?

Thorry84, to lemmyshitpost in If only it was like that

Not to defend Fahrenheit, it’s a nonsense scale, however: As with most subjective scales the entire scale can be split into good and not good. The top part is good and the bottom part is not good. The middle of the top part is seen as average good.

So around 75 degrees would be perfect, which is close enough for something as subjective as temperature.

This is why in things like movie or game reviews a 7/10 is seen as average. Like it’s good, in the good part, but right in the middle not anything special. A 5/10 or lower is seen as not good, not worth seeing, not worth your time etc. This works for reviews, grades, person attractiveness rating etc.

Thorry84, (edited ) to memes in Pilk

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Thorry84, to lemmyshitpost in Wow, my uncle has been trying to save Christmas all along!

    I’m gonna start my own Christmas with Hookers and Blow

    Thorry84, (edited ) to linux in My First Regular Expressions

    I can also recommend the book the TS mentioned, it is very good and after reading it you will understand regular expressions. It’s fine to use a cheat sheet if you want, cause if you don’t do it regularly the knowledge can sag, but the understanding is what matters. Also depending on the context, different implementations can have slightly different syntax or modifiers to be aware of.

    I lent out the book to my brother once and he somehow lost it, so I never got it back. Don’t lend out book guys.

    And remember not everything can be solved using a regular expression: xkcd.com/1171/

    Thorry84, to lemmyshitpost in When you've been in the pool a little too long...
  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #