@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

USSBurritoTruck

@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Interesting theory. If you’d never previously seen “Discovery” called STD, what made you choose it?

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

It 100% did involve Kurtzman. People out here just making up whatever nonsense fits their narrative. Clown shit.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Hollywood nepo babies are a real problem.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

That bit of lore is completely silly. Humans share a common ancestor with bananas if we go back far enough, and “The Chase” proposes to go back even further than that. Still a good episode, though.

However, nothing in Disco’s Klingon’s undoes that. We saw Klingon precursors when Worf was devolved into one in “Genesis” – another episode that has a Hollywood writer’s understanding of evolution – and he had an exoskeleton, mandibles, and spit acid.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Edit: changed “STD” to “discovery” as apparently we’re in middle school

Buddy, considering how absolutely childish the moniker “STD” has always been, you’ve got no ground to whine here.

Secondly, at least in middle school, children are taught the meaning of the word, “objectively.”

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

There is no other Trek that follows that name convention. We don’t call “Voyager” STV or “Enterprise” STE. For me to believe that someone had a) never seen someone use STD applied to Disco pejoratively and, b) decided to use that abbreviation when DIS, DSC, and Disco are all far more common, I would have to be convinced that this is their first week discussing Star Trek on the internet.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

This is just petty.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Discovery also had hologram communication technology that I guess was also a secret? Starfleet went back to flatscreens for everything and didn’t use holograms again until the 24th century.

In “The Undiscovered Country” we see the Klingons are watching the Federation President’s discussion with Azetbur using a grainy hologram. If they’re able to receive a holographic signal, that implies that the Federation is transmitting one. Hell, even in the TOS episode, “Return of the Archons” when confronted with the holographic projection of Landru, Kirk and Spock recognize it for what it is right away, but the things they remark upon are the fact that there’s no visible projectors, and Kirk says it’s “Beautiful.”

I don’t think it’s too much of a stretch based on what we’ve see to say that Starfleet decided that holographic projections were too low fidelity compared to viewscreens.

Hell, it even happens again. As you note, they made another attempt at holographic communication in the 24th century, which we see in DS9 the Defiant is kitted out with the new holo-communicator, allowing a fully realized, high fidelity, holodeck quality real time holographic communication. And where else have we seen it? We never see the Enterprise E use that technology; In “Nemesis” Shinzon is able to broadcast a hologram of himself from the Scimitar to Picard’s ready room, but he claims it’s through the use of his own holo-emitters. We’ve never seen it in LDecks, PRO, or PIC, all of which take place after DS9.

So yeah, Starfleet went back to flat screens for everything.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

It’s amazing, sometimes the complaint is that Disco is written like an action movie, and sometimes it’s that it’s written like a drama where the characters are overly emotional. I’m impressed that the writers have managed to create Schrodinger’s televisions show, where it’s in a quantum state of being whatever the person complaining about it needs it to be so long as they’re able to drive a narrative of it being bad.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

I think to say that Disco has nothing that contradicts established canon is overselling it a bit. But, I will say that all Trek has violated established canon at one point or another, up to and including TOS itself, which was created by people who had no idea at the time that anyone would even remember it some 57 years later, let alone be obsessed with all this minutiae.

If we ignore visual continuity – which, as a life long comic book reader, I am more than happy to do – Disco still has some few contradictions here and there, but I will say that it actually toes the line without crossing over it too frequently fairly well, allowing it to have some interesting and new approaches to Trek.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

What is what?

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

There’s no in universe justification for Adira. She doesn’t come from a backwards culture

Regardless of your opinions about the storyline, you can address the character by their proper pronouns. Or you can choose to no longer post here.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Why do you feel like an expectation of a minimal level of respect for other people is a threat?

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

What does Burnham get served to her?

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

You’re correct. Have a time out.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

I mean you can choose to respect people’s pronouns or you can choose to no longer be a member of this community. What is unclear?

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Mariner seems like she’s done self sabotaging, so none of them, really.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Smart of you, OP, to not include Morn in this because we all know he’d be the only choice for both Fuck and Marry.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

This is the type of quality c/risa needs. Thank you.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

I really enjoyed Resurgence starting out, and without giving too much away, I liked the general thrust of the story, but man there are certain points along the way where you really see the Telltale cracks in the Trek facade.

USSBurritoTruck, (edited )
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Garidian. They’re a subject species of the Romulan Star Empire, and use similar ships, but theirs are a pale brown/grey with red designs.

https://startrek.website/pictrs/image/b292a853-7d30-4703-b3a8-dc512b99ab3c.png

One of them showed up in the PIC prequel tie-in novel staring Troi and Riker, and apparently they’re in STO now as well.

USSBurritoTruck, (edited )
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

What I like about this is that in Star Trek Adventures, a 1 always counts as two successes.

So, normal difficulty for operating the transporter is 2, but O’Brien is clearly in the transporter room, which reduces the difficulty by 1. We don’t know if the ensign started out on a transporter pad, or if the intent was to beam her to one, but under normal circumstances, the highest difficulty for the roll would be 3.

O’Brien has base two dice, and we know he got a 1 on the one the one die in the meme, which is already two successes. The only official stats for O’Brien are in the DS9 Player Characters pdf, and he has 10 Control + 5 Engineering, so if he rolls 15 or less (75% chance) he gets that additional success needed. He also has Focus in Transporters, so on a 5 or less (25% chance) he scores an additional success on top of the first.

Transporter rolls are also aided by the ship, which means the Enterprise D gets to roll one die, and the official Enterprise stats give it a 9 Sensors + 2 Engineering, so it needs to roll an 11 or less (55% chance) to score one success, and ships always roll with Focus, so on a 2 or less (10% chance) to get two successes total.

Also, O’Brien has the Technical Expertise Talent, and whenever he rolls a task aided by the ship’s Sensors Attribute, which is the case here, he can re-roll one die including the die that the ship rolled.

Of course, there could be a situation where this particular difficulty was increased by the GM for some reason, but O’Brien should know that before rolling, and could have purchased additional dice with Momentum, or Threat if the Momentum pool was tapped. The likelihood of O’Brien of all characters failing a transporters roll so badly that someone dies is just incredibly small.

All of which is to say that Chief Miles Edward O’Brien murdered that woman.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

You are awesome.

Accurate.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

You’d be probably better off posting this to the Star Trek discussion community as opposed to the memes and shitposts one.

USSBurritoTruck,
@USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website avatar

Why, is there a new volume of the Trek Encyclopedia being released?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #