Comments

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

snooggums, to asklemmy in What is your unpopular flim opinion
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

At a certain point you realize anime relies heavily on its perpetual fandom refresh, with new fans replacing the ones who “aged out.”

Not unique to anime, Hollywood has been remaking movies and TV shows 'for a new generation' forever. Anime is just following the same pattern.

snooggums, to lemmyshitpost in Just speak normally
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

9.75

snooggums, to linux in Alright, I'm gonna "take one for the team" -- what is with the "downvote-happy" users lately?
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

Australian upvotes.

snooggums, to feminism in Ohio State University health sciences course requires students to engage with ‘White Privilege Knapsack’
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

I also grew up dirt poor only affording ramen and rice.

If nothing else, we can acknowledge that choosing to eat Ramen and rice now is not the outcome for a lot of people who tried just as hard as we did to move up the economic ladder. They are often still stuck in the same position because of things outside their control.

snooggums, to asklemmy in Former religious lemmings, what made you quit religion or stop being a believer?
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

I went to church as a young kid, but never really believed and by interacting with people from different denominations and religions it became clear that the church I went to claiming to be the right one out of thousands was pretty unlikely. Was able to talk my mom out of taking me around 12 years old, and spent a couple years as agnostic until deciding that science made a lot more sense and if we could prove there was a god, he would just be part of nature and therefore not really a god as taught in church.

So basically thinking critically about it undermined the teachings. I still kept the positive messaging, but also added in the positive messaging from other religions and honestly see them all as more cultural than mystical.

snooggums, (edited ) to memes in Road Rage
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

Even worse: when they drive faster than you, then slower, then faster again, then slower...

snooggums, to historyporn in The Monowheel, Italy, 1933
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

None of it works well.

snooggums, to asklemmy in Lesbians of lemmy, how do you introduce your SO to other people without getting them confused for just a friend?
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

Howdy, partner!

snooggums, (edited ) to asklemmy in Lesbians of lemmy, how do you introduce your SO to other people without getting them confused for just a friend?
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

Right now?

I clearly don't know how being a lesbian works.

snooggums, to lemmyshitpost in Also, it's over 2 1/2 hours long.
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

The Bechdel test is a famous test of film to measure whether a movie represents women as more than just accessories for the male cast. Specifically, the test is passed if a film features two women who have a conversation about something other than a man. Surprisingly, a lot of films fail this test.

It isn't surprising for a few reasons.

  1. A lot of movies, which the test highlights, have female characters that are not really fleshed out because of sexism. They only exist for the real characters, the men!
  2. A lot of movies don't have female characters because of the setting, like The Shawshank Redemption. An all men's prison just isn't going to have women in it. Small cast movies in similar all male settings are also not surprising to fail the test.
  3. Some movies are all about a main character and there aren't scenes that don't discuss the main character. So a conversation that doesn't include the main character would be forced in just to meet the test.

Now, while it isn't surprising that a lot of movies fail the test, the real purpose of the test is to show how all three types of movies are massively over represented in the number of movies made. #3 is an issue overall because of how the vast majority of main characters are men and not women. #2 is an issue overall because of how many movies there are about all male settings. It highlights the overall trend that main characters are men and the movies are all about the men, and wouldn't be an issue if there were just as many movies about women or with casts that only include women. The Descent stands out with all characters being women because that is very rare!

So if a single movie fails the test because of the setting or small cast, it isn't necessarily a bad thing. If there is a diverse cast, but the women are not fleshed out then it is an issue. If a movie could have included women, but they were too lazy to do so and to give them characterization, then it is an issue.

snooggums, to baldurs_gate_3 in Baldur's Gate 3 player traps themselves in Hell by casting Silence on the Devil himself
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

I assumed the +1 would come with a curse and finished her off!

snooggums, to memes in Early bird
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

Maybe society could prioritize children over capitalism?

snooggums, to memes in Early bird
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

Seems like the lesson is that students shouldn't need to have a job while going to school because they have enough to do already.

snooggums, (edited ) to risa in Get this shit out of here
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

He is politically hetero for sexual reasons?

snooggums, to movies in [DISCUSSION] What director(s) do you think have the best filmography?
@snooggums@kbin.social avatar

Enemy was fantastic!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #