mander.xyz

Knusper, to science_memes in Why there are no time travelers.

Well, I’m glad we got to the bottom of what’s unrealistic about traveling back in time…

nieceandtows, to science_memes in Why there are no time travelers.

I don’t remember the name of the novel, so somebody help me with this. The concept is basically that scientists invent time travel, but use it as a teleportation device instead. Set the machine by a few seconds, you teleport the distance covered by the Earth during that time. They even use the technique to plan for an assasination of Kim Jong Un. Loved that one. Some innovative sequences using the ‘time machine’.

Edit: Found it. It’s actually two books (original and sequel).

Split Second - www.goodreads.com/book/…/26216031-split-second

and

Time Frame - www.goodreads.com/book/show/37946554-time-frame

The first book takes its time revealing the ‘time travel’, but the second book dives head first into using the technology proficiently.

SkyNTP, to science_memes in Why there are no time travelers.

Weak premise considering the principles of relativity, and how our current understanding of time travel is basically rooted in SPACE-time.

unionagainstdhmo, to science_memes in Why there are no time travelers.
@unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone avatar

Relative to the position of the Earth, the Earth doesn’t move

observantTrapezium, to science_memes in It just works!
@observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca avatar

🤣

AdmiralShat, to science_memes in How can I score an invite to these parties?

How do they differentiate these mating types and what separate things do they contribute to the life cycle?

idiomaddict,

From the Wikipedia page:

It has 23,328 distinct mating types. Individuals of any mating type are compatible for mating with most other mating types. There are two genetic loci determining the mating type, locus A with 288 alleles and locus B with 81 alleles. A pair of fungi will only be fertile if they have different A and different B alleles; that is, each mating type can enter fertile pairings with 22,960 others.

Blackmist, to science_memes in How can I score an invite to these parties?

Imagine the size of their fucking flag.

Cethin,

That’s the glorious thing about the rainbow. It contains all (visible) colors. (Obviously the pride flag is limited to stripes of distinct colors, but it’s supposed to be representative of everything.)

lowleveldata, to science_memes in What is gravity?

I still want to know what it is tho

pimento64,

A force field generated by your mom’s obesity

Aurenkin, to science_memes in What is gravity?

Damn, this meme has some weight to it

wjrii, to science_memes in What is gravity?
@wjrii@kbin.social avatar

The squishy humanities version of this, in America at least, goes as follows:

In grade school you learn that the Civil War was about slavery.

In high school you learn that the Civil War was about a lot of complicated things.

In college you learn that the Civil War was about slavery.

TheTurducken,
@TheTurducken@mander.xyz avatar

Apu learned in post-grad glasses that it was complicated again.

bstix, to science_memes in What is gravity?

It’s not difficult. Gravity is like magnetism for things that aren’t magnetic.

Rinox,

Also for those that are magnetic

TheTurducken, to science_memes in What is gravity?
@TheTurducken@mander.xyz avatar

Perfect use of this format. “I don’t know” is the foundation of wisdom. See: reddit where too many think they know.

zalgotext,

See: reddit literally any message board where members of the general populace can freely participate where too many think they know.

FTFY

dingleberry, to science_memes in least unhinged econ researcher

“that shit must be gnarly! believe me, there are economic reasons for that”

AlexWIWA, to science_memes in What is gravity?

Yeah I think I’ll be subscribing to this community. Thank you for the meme.

HawlSera, to science_memes in pluto pls

I’m glad Neil DeGrasse Tyson is so universally reviled by people who actually care about science…

Honestly asking one’s opinion on him is enough to tell who is interested by science and who “totally loves science bro”

MonkeMischief,

It’s so refreshing to hear this. Even when I was less educated, his smugness annoyed me SO MUCH that it made me feel like “If actual cosmologists are like this, I couldn’t stand them anyway.” It made science and the community feel very unattractive, since his marketing puts him all over the place where the tag “science” appears.

He talks like a fedora-sporting moderator from a ~2006 atheist-reason-rational-skeptics-or-else forum. As if he personally has already unlocked all the secrets of the universe and if your sci-fi movie isn’t perfectly adhering to known science you’re an absolute buffoon.

Sadly Bill Nye seems kinda similar, and I even got to meet him in person. He was rather irked that people wanted to get pictures and autographs with him long before the symposium even started. (Despite being lauded as a hero by countless inquisitive children and all)

TL;DR: Despite the unrelenting tide of anti-intellect, I’m glad there’s a lot of serious scientists who aren’t just in it to lord it over everybody else.

HawlSera,

The people who “Fucking love science” are just another flavor of anti Intellectual

Probably the saddest kind. The ones in denial

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #