name_NULL111653,

Non cogito, ergo non sum.

FedFer,

Multi stulti non cognitant tamen sunt.

Deuces,

post hoc, ergo propter hoc

Valmond,

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

(Who’s guarding the guardians)

Ulvain, (edited )

agentibus emissumque canis de?

(Who let the dogs out)

SonnyVabitch,

Are we disrespecting Latin now?? Sic transit gloria mundi!

Stovetop,

Wow, no need for the at person remarks.

phoneymouse,

Academic philosophy is mostly concerned with the Greeks and Germans. The Romans had their philosophers, but they did not have the same influence on modern thought.

Also, often times philosophers do use an original word or phrase because it cannot be translated well into English. Language evolves over time and concepts as they were originally understood can be lost or muddled by modern uses of a word used to substitute. Also, etymology is more and more important in philosophy.

balderdash9,

I read and write in academic philosophy for a living. Philosophers causally throw around Latin phrases in their writing (and, sometimes embarrassingly, even when speaking):

  • Many from historical figures (e.g., Kant’s a priori/a posteriori, Berkeley’s “esse ist percepi”, Descartes “cogito ero sum”, Leibniz’s “salva veritate”, etc.)
  • Forms/rules in logic (e.g., “modus ponens”, “modus tollens”, “reductio ad absurdum”, etc.)
  • Informal fallacy names (e.g., “ad hominem”, “tu quoque”, “ad populum”, etc)
  • As well as a myriad of other commonly used terms you’re expected to know when reading philosophy (e.g., prima facie, mutatis mutandis, a fortiori, eo ipso, ex nihilo, sui generis, ceteris paribus, ad hoc, non sequitur, etc. etc.).

This is not a random list. Every one of these Latin phrases sees heavy use in today’s philosophical literature.

Prunebutt,

OP confused philosophers with lawyers, probably.

balderdash9,
bl4ckeagle,
Enkers, (edited )

Canis in willa dormit.

Tar_alcaran,

Caecillius est in horto

Diplomjodler,

Cum tacuisses, philosophus mansisses.

harry_balzac,

Semper ubi sub ubi

smeg,

Romanes eunt domus

blackluster117,
@blackluster117@possumpat.io avatar

Carthago delenda est

match,
@match@pawb.social avatar

Quod erat demonstrandum.

calypsopub,

Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam.

Prunebutt,

Romanus eunt domus.

Fades,

Eunt, what is eunt?

Er… to go!

Conjugate the verb to go…

dellish,

Domus? Nominative? This is motion towards isn’t it, boy?

Viking_Hippie,

Sounds like Judean People’s Front propaganda!

gedaliyah,
@gedaliyah@lemmy.world avatar

Splitters!

SoupBrick,

Quid pro quo

gedaliyah, (edited )
@gedaliyah@lemmy.world avatar

If only there were some way to express the concept of “this for that” in simple English.

Oops I just did it

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #