Blackmist,

What about M3gan though?

vsh,
@vsh@lemm.ee avatar

I don’t watch movies 🗿

onichama,

Easy, just be the girl yourself

Jarix,

Lol these are the two.movies that were playing when i last went to the drive in movie theatre near me

GrammatonCleric,
@GrammatonCleric@lemmy.world avatar

This shit is so damn stale, starving pigeons won’t eat it.

PatFussy,

I would watch Barbie 500x before I watch Oppenheimer again. That movie was made for people with 10 second attention spans and that cinematographer should be arrested. Im surprised people didnt get epilepsy watching Oppenheimer.

VinnieFarsheds,
@VinnieFarsheds@lemmy.world avatar

Skill issue. Just reading the Wikipedia article on the Manhattan Project would have given you most of the knowledge you need. I watched Oppenheimer and Barbie and liked both for different reasons.

Something_Complex, (edited )

Wow, one has one of the most important and impressive complex storyline ever.

The other one slightly defies gender roles and they rush the end…

Shit I liked them both, but if you don’t like Oppenheimer it might be BC your IQ sits under the requirements man.

Edit: I’m sorry for you guys :(, the world must be so simple too you I kinda admire it

volvoxvsmarla,

An important and complex storyline can still be executed awfully either in writing or cinematography. But you gotta have at least a somewhat under the average IQ to understand that.

Something_Complex,

Well I’ve whatched it’s really good. If you don’t understand people like west Anderson and directors in the same category I really wonder if you think this movie was bad

volvoxvsmarla,

It’s not about the movie(s) in question, it is a general statement. Saying a movie is automatically good because the underlying story is good or worth telling is denouncing so many factors that play into making a movie a good movie. PatFussy was only pointing out that the cutting was terrible (I haven’t seen the movie itself so I cannot judge it) and too fast paced. This is something that can absolutely ruin an otherwise great movie and make it unbearable to watch. The story, the script, the dialogue, the acting, the effects, the cutting, the lighting, the sound and soundtrack- all these things (and many more) are individually important and only when everything works well together a movie can be good (doesn’t automatically mean it is a good movie). Is Oppenheimer a story worth being told? Probably. Most stories are. Has it been told in a well executed way? I don’t know, and also this is a highly personal matter of taste. If someone thinks the cutting is epileptic then that’s a valid opinion that has nothing to do with their intelligence, not understanding a movie, or having an unsophisticated taste in cinema.

As a side note, putting “West” Anderson in a category with Christopher Nolan is ridiculous. One makes arty, more indie movies with rather obscure storylines that rely heavily on the script and dialogue, while the other makes grand style blockbuster action movies. Except for both of them being famous and making movies, the difference could not be vaster.

MagicPterodactyl,

“West Anderson” LMAO

Sunfoil,

Like most Nolan films, it is pseudo-intellectual tripe that allows people to think they’re smart because they can follow the plot of a simple Hollywood blockbuster produced for the lowest common denominator. Its cinematography is like they’re making a tiktok to hold your atrophied attention span.

The fact that you refer to the plot as ‘the most important and impressive complex storyline ever’ portrays your age, how little film you watch, and probably why we shouldn’t believe your take on either Barbie, Oppenheimer, or anything else.

Annoyed_Crabby,

Tfw you’re the woman who fit both criteria

No no that’s not me, i’m a guy who’s dumb as fuck.

MyFairJulia,
@MyFairJulia@lemmy.world avatar

My gf and me watched both Oppenheimer and Barbie a few weeks before we got together. I loved both movies equally and my gf definitely preferred Oppenheimer.

kn0wmad1c,
@kn0wmad1c@programming.dev avatar

You can also watch either movie if you’re stupid and alone. I should know because I did it.

JohnDClay,

To be clear, you don’t need any of those things to enjoy either movie.

starman2112,
@starman2112@sh.itjust.works avatar

It’s actually much harder to watch Oppenheimer, because you have to see him say his famous catchphrase in a scene that could show John Green how to make sex more awkward

Jackcooper,

It’s oppen time?

starman2112,
@starman2112@sh.itjust.works avatar

He says, as Tatlock remounts him with the book in hand. “It’s ancient sumerian, and translates to… It’s Oppen-time-r”

MindSkipperBro12,

And it diminished the value of that phrase.

starman2112,
@starman2112@sh.itjust.works avatar

Oh yeah. It’s an absolute fucking insult to the man. He didn’t actually feel any of the gravity of the situation when he remarked “now I am become death, destroyer of worlds,” he wasn’t making a reference to a religious text, he just remembered that cool time he had sex and his lover dismounted, walked over to the bookcase, pulled a random book off the shelf, and asked “what does this means?” before getting back on

ChickenLadyLovesLife,

pulled a random book off the shelf

Interestingly enough, this is where Serge Tankian got some of the lyrics for “Chop Suey”.

Vub,

I smell incel.

Sheeple, (edited )
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

Yup. Probably didn’t even watch Barbie. Or Oppenheimer for that matter.

Pelicanen,

I’m hoping that he’s just making a joke about social ineptitude rather than making sexist claims.

1984, (edited )
@1984@lemmy.today avatar

Oppenheimer was really boring but so was Barbie.

Both were shit, but highly rated.

VinnieFarsheds,
@VinnieFarsheds@lemmy.world avatar

Movie watching skill issue

Ryan213,
@Ryan213@lemmy.world avatar

I actually enjoyed Barbie more. Both good movies though.

MargotRobbie,
@MargotRobbie@lemmy.world avatar

Yay

Ryan213,
@Ryan213@lemmy.world avatar

Omg omg you were awesome! Ilysm!!

TexMexBazooka,

Lol

MargotRobbie,
@MargotRobbie@lemmy.world avatar

Of course I am, when was I ever not the best part of every movie I’m in?

Diprount_Tomato, (edited )
@Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world avatar

I didn’t. Barbie was a nice time watching a movie that didn’t even seem to take itself seriously so it allows surreal and fun moments.

But Oppenheimer was just a masterpiece

Ryan213,
@Ryan213@lemmy.world avatar

To each their own!

MargotRobbie,
@MargotRobbie@lemmy.world avatar

Pssh. Everyone knows that the lead actress whats-her-name takes herself super seriously and would never, ever, say or do anything just because it’s funny.

PRUSSIA_x86, (edited )

Is that academy award winning actress Margot Robbie, star of the silver screen sensation Barbie?

MargotRobbie,
@MargotRobbie@lemmy.world avatar

Nominated. Would have been winning* if they let me name the movie “It’s Hardin’ Time” instead of “I, Tonya” then have Jared Leto rip me off.

True genius is never appreciated until it is too late.

funkless_eck,

I strongly disagree. Both were middling and forgettable. In a year or so most people will struggle to recall anything about either movie.

Something_Complex,

cuz maybe you are not smart enough to understand Oppenheimer.

But I guess some people are just simple.

Here I’ll translate, bomb go bombom humanity goes die die. Unstoppable process , no stop.

Simple?

Ibaudia,
@Ibaudia@lemmy.world avatar

I loved Oppenheimer because I love biopics. Didn’t bother with Barbie because it seemed not my style.

partial_accumen, (edited )

Didn’t bother with Barbie because it seemed not my style.

What I assumed the movie would be about being a Barbie movie isn’t my style either. However, the Barbie movie was quite a bit more than I expected. I rather liked the subtle feminist messaging underneath the obvious message. The movie also didn’t take itself too seriously on what could be considered very delicate topics. I’d recommend it even for non-typical Barbie doll audience.

naught,

The musical numbers are also great

thorbot,

Ok I’m definitely out

naught,

I support u

SpaceNoodle,

There was subtle messaging beneath the extremely overt messaging?

MargotRobbie,
@MargotRobbie@lemmy.world avatar

While the feminist message was not meant to be subtle, there are plenty of subtle messages that people still haven’t figured out yet. At it’s core, Barbie is about identity and existence.

It’s not that deep, but it is a bit more complex than at first glance.

0ops,

For what it’s worth, Barbie was way weirder than I thought it was going to be. Worth a watch imo

Ryan213,
@Ryan213@lemmy.world avatar

It didn’t seem my style either but I went anyway and enjoyed it.

bighatchester,

I feel like me and my gf are the only people that had zero interest in Oppenheimer . Just didn’t appeal to me at all , barbie was great though !

NocturnalMorning, (edited )

A little sexist on this joke don’t you think?

STRIKINGdebate2,
@STRIKINGdebate2@lemmy.world avatar

All things exist so I don’t understand your point. Btw if you meant sexist then it’s not.

NocturnalMorning,

I did mean sexist, and it is.

DragonTypeWyvern,

Sexist, no.

The person making the original comment being insecure in their masculinity, yes.

snapoff,

It’s implicit bias based on the fallacy of both stereotypes and gender roles in society

feedum_sneedson, (edited )

I’m on the semen diet. I see men, I eat them.

Haagel,

Did you just assume my existence?!

kamenlady,
@kamenlady@lemmy.world avatar

The audacity!

NocturnalMorning,

Yes, sorry about that.

TexMexBazooka,

CHECK YOUR PRIVILEGE!

creditCrazy,
@creditCrazy@lemmy.world avatar

Fellas is it sexist to be shy, awkward, boring person to hang around, or have shit luck.

MindSkipperBro12,

“Wanna hear the N word, Murray?”

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #