linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

WreckingBANG, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@WreckingBANG@lemmy.ml avatar

Fedora. Dont get me wrong it is a great Distro but i did not really felt at home when using it.

Goun, in Why do you use the terminal?

Repeatibility (is that a word?) and scriptability. I find CLI tools easier to work with and easier to get information from them.

dreugeworst, in Why do you use the terminal?

Because you can’t (easily) program gui apps to automate tasks, but combining a few terminal programs to get more complex behaviour is really easy

Blaster_M, in Switching to Debian on my gaming pc

Mint

Blaster_M,

also dual boot first before going cold turkey

Marduk73,
@Marduk73@sh.itjust.works avatar

i went cold turkey when i got that early, free upgrade from win7 to win 10. after a week of win 10 and unable to downgrade back to 7. Bam. i became full time linux at that moment.

PlasterAnalyst,

I've had stability issues with mint. It's usually a problem with updates bricking my install.

Quackdoc, in Live (Animated) wallpapers programs for linux
@Quackdoc@lemmy.world avatar

I use mpvpaper on sway and cosmic

letsgo, in Why do you use the terminal?

For simple tasks you don’t need CLI. Most GUIs implement basic workflows and do a reasonable job at it (obviously not counting the ridiculous amount of time Windows needs to “compute space requirements” while deleting an empty directory. Seems it’s more important to get that little popup on screen and run the animation a few times than actually doing the job).

It’s when you get past the basics that CLI comes into its own. Those grindy things you do in Windows clicking one thing at a time? Glue a couple of commands together in the CLI and it’s done in a tiny fraction of the time.

art, in Why do you use the terminal?
@art@lemmy.world avatar

Some applications take some time to load up visual elements that you don’t need before you can start using it. When you got a lot of work to do sometimes that just slows you down.

A lot of CLI programs do one thing and do it well while also working excellently in custom scripts.

Carter, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

PopOS and Manjaro are two I never liked.

MNByChoice, (edited ) in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

Not too ick someone’s yum, and this ventures outside of Linux.

I dislike the BSDs. Great for getting pf, and not being a homogeneous shop, but just different enough to be difficult outside of one specific use case.

Gentoo was similar. It may be different now, but a pain on the Xbox.

Mint was too dumbed down and ugly.

Ubuntu is useful, but likely harmful with it’s constant pushes to commercialize everything.

Redhat is needed for work, but the commercialization drives worse quality. Documentation seems purposely bad to drive training courses.

(Yes, I like Debian.)

Presi300, in Why do you use the terminal?
@Presi300@lemmy.world avatar

Makes me feel like a hacker and makes other ppl think that I’m smarter than I am… That and there are certain things that are just more convenient through the terminal

HouseWolf, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?

The first distro I tried to daily drive on my desktop was Pop!_OS because everyone told me it’s the distro you “need” if you have an Nvidia card.

I’m sure it works fine for most people but I just had A LOT of issue, weird audio issues I had to fix every other time I turned on my system, some games refusing to load properly unless I forced them into borderless fullscreen.

Then one day it just refused to boot, even tho I had booted into it that morning and did nothing more than go on Youtube for an hour before work, Timeshift didn’t work even tho I had manually made a handful of backups.

Went back to Windows for about 2 months before trying EndeavourOS and despite peoples warning that Arch systems will break if you look at them the wrong way, I’ve found it way more stable on my system and any issues I have ran into have been easy fixes.

westyvw, (edited ) in New systemd update will bring Windows’ infamous Blue Screen of Death to Linux | Ars Technica

What a sensational, over blown article. ArsTechnica this is shitty journalism and you should know it.

The headline would be about as correct if it said “SystemD update will bring Amiga’s Guru Meditation screen to Linux.”

This update has nothing to do with Windows. Error displays with additional information about the crash is not exclusive to windows, nor new. In fact a Kernel Panic screen happened in Unix.

Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug,

The majority of linux articles have me checking the comments first to see if someone talks about ridiculous click bait crap, honestly saved me a lot of time.

muhyb,

I was sick of Reddit’s clickbait titles. It’s sad to see they moved here as well.

Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug,

To be fair, it’s the articles themselves

muhyb,

I suppose that’s the main problem, I didn’t check the article since the title reeks clickbaity enough. However I wouldn’t share an article if the the title obviously is a clickbait, I’m sure there are bunch of respectable sources about this development.

mex,

To be fair, it is called a BSOD, which is a term widely associated with Windows.

cetvrti_magi, in Why do you use the terminal?
@cetvrti_magi@lemmy.world avatar

Because I prefer using keyboard for almost everything and in most cases terminal is faster than GUI.

cetvrti_magi, in What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
@cetvrti_magi@lemmy.world avatar

After using Arch based distros for more than a year when I use any Debian/Ubuntu based distro it really feels like they aren’t for me, at least when it comes to daily driving. I still have a laptop with PopOS that I use for school, stable distro is a better option in my oppinion for that usecase because I use it twice a week (unless it’s summer or winter in which case I don’t use it at all).

Discover5164, in Laptop with long runtime

i have the same requirements as you. i bought framework 13.

i’m still in the confuguration phase, for now it has a decent battery run of ~6/8h of installing stuff. i’m configuring nixos.

not_a_bot_i_swear,
@not_a_bot_i_swear@lemmy.world avatar

I looked into them. And it sounded a lot of the users are not happy about the build quality compared to Thinkpads or Latitudes. How is your experience? Did you go with Intel or AMD?

Discover5164,

i just got a ThinkPad for work, it’s spectacular. but if you need to replace something…

the framework is solid, and allows to replace anything. i think the tradeoff is very fair.

BaldProphet,
@BaldProphet@kbin.social avatar

Build quality on Frameworks is dramatically better than most ThinkPads. They've made a lot of improvements to battery life since the first generation (I got mine in the second batch), so it might have decent battery life now. They've always been more efficient on Linux than on Windows.

the_q,

Build quality? You mean replaceable parts vs glue making things feel more solid? Have I had this conversation with you before?

Jumuta,

you have TLP configured?

Discover5164,

yes but default config, i still need to look into it

datendefekt,
@datendefekt@lemmy.ml avatar

Which CPU are you using? I’ve got the 11th gen i5 and battery life is just miserable, especially in standby.

Discover5164,

i5-1340p

there is a kernel parameter to add to make standby better: mem_sleep_default=deep.

if you are on nixos you can import the framework hardware module from “nixos-hardware”. it also includes other fixes

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #