linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

DangerousInternet, in GitHub - G-dH/vertical-workspaces: V-Shell is a GNOME Shell extension that allows you to customize the layout and behavior of the Shell UI.
@DangerousInternet@lemmy.world avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • juli, (edited )

    The advantage of V Shell is that you switch workspaces vertically as well instead of scrolling sideways. It overrides the native GNOME scrolling.

    Amount of options are overwhelming. It is extending GNOME with a lot of functions

    There is a little flashing when scrolling through workspaces you’re right. All else it works alright I guess.

    KISSmyOS, in How to hide the world clock in GNOME?

    uninstall gnome-clocks (it doesn’t remove the standard clock in your panel)

    juli,

    nice, thx

    psud, in Kernel 6.6.6 is out 😈
    CmdrKeen,
    @CmdrKeen@lemmy.today avatar
    fennek182, in What are you most excited when it comes to linux in 2024?

    HDR playback

    moonleay, in Kernel 6.6.6 is out 😈

    now we can merge the bsd source tree

    juli, in GitHub - G-dH/vertical-workspaces: V-Shell is a GNOME Shell extension that allows you to customize the layout and behavior of the Shell UI.

    I just found a bloody always on top button while searching extensions for “button”. crazy times we live in :D

    zephr_c, in Shortcomings and regressions in Plasma 6 wayland for artists using and configuring graphic tablets

    Fedora has always been where Red Hat goes to force the adoption of not quite finished software. If you are not okay with that, you shouldn’t be using Fedora. This is not the first time they’ve done it, and it won’t be the last.

    raghukamath,

    I understand that and henceforth I won’t be suggesting any artist to use fedora. meanwhile it would be nice to get attention to these bugs.

    zephr_c,

    Fair.

    Pantherina, in How to solve this boot error message?

    Did you change your fstab, or have a full partition or something?

    dafunkkk,

    I not on that machine but as far as I remember it’s a full ntfs partition, don’t think I ever changed fstab

    ScottE,

    Your root filesystem is NTFS? That’s likely the problem - I’m surprised it boots at all. Switching to a Linux filesystem is the likely solution. You could also try a newer kernel, too - 5.10 is quite old, current LTS is 6.1. Good luck.

    dafunkkk,

    sorry was ext4…ops

    MyNameIsRichard, in What are you most excited when it comes to linux in 2024?
    @MyNameIsRichard@lemmy.ml avatar

    I’m looking forward to Plasma 6

    funkyfarmington, in What are you most excited when it comes to linux in 2024?

    Seeing m$ lose a little more market share.

    LunaCtld, in What are you most excited when it comes to linux in 2024?
    @LunaCtld@lemmy.world avatar

    GIMP 3.0

    YoorWeb,

    Is this actually happening in this decade?

    possiblylinux127,

    Unlikely

    grendel, in Kernel 6.6.6 is out 😈
    @grendel@lemmy.world avatar

    HAIL STALLMANSATAN

    merthyr1831, in Integrity and config errors Ubuntu

    It’s a thing with certain laptops, where their secure boot certs are outdated or something. Not really anything you can do to fix, but it doesnt mean anything in practice - I never had issues with it after running linux across multiple distros about a year on my Acer nitro 5.

    only thing you might have issues with is using secure boot in certain distros but if you don’t have problems then no need to worry

    Another_username,

    Thanks for your reply! That goes for both the errors?

    merthyr1831,

    the gpio one could also just be the BIOS being whacky. I think I have the same one show up on my Acer laptop and I’ve never had an issue.

    Another_username,

    The gpio one was fixed with the last update :)

    KISSmyOS, (edited ) in How to solve this boot error message?

    In the grub menu, choose advanced options and then choose an older kernel to boot into.
    If that boots fine, remove and reinstall the newest installed kernel and run sudo update-grub.
    That should be the easiest way to fix the most possible causes of this error.

    Edit: Now would be a very good time to back up all your data to an external drive. This might be a sign of your hard drive failing.

    Synthead,

    I wouldn’t be quick to assume that this means a failing disk. There would probably be more sporadic issues if this were the case.

    KISSmyOS,

    I wouldn’t assume a failing disk either.
    But every time there’s an error you can’t pin on something you just did, a full backup should be the first thing you do as a matter of principle.

    dafunkkk, (edited )

    ok, I’ll backup all data first. How can I remove old kernel without enter in grub menu (since usually boot works well) and select the oldone as default? Thanks

    KISSmyOS, (edited )

    By default, your grub menu should show up every time you boot.
    If it doesn’t, boot your PC and do:
    sudo nano /etc/default/grub
    You need these lines:
    GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
    GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=menu

    Every line starting with:
    GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT
    should be commented out like so:
    #GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT

    Then run sudo update-grub and reboot.

    What this does:

    • sets a countdown of 10 seconds before grub boots the kernel
    • tells grub to show the boot menu during that countdown
    • doesn’t use a hidden countdown that waits for a button press to show the menu

    In the grub menu, select advanced options and there you should be able to select an older kernel to boot.

    dafunkkk, (edited )

    ok, thank you very much for detailed explanation, yes I remember that I had removed timeout from grub in the past, I will follow your procedure and select previous kernel. Another question, once I’v selected the older kernel did you think that removing (it’s fine using apt?) and resinstall newest kernel will fix the issue or I’v to keep the older kernel? In case I’v to keep the older kernel how can I avoid that it will be overwritten once I update the os?

    KISSmyOS, (edited )

    I think the newer kernel should work after reinstallation.
    If it doesn’t and you want to stay with the older one:

    apt list --installed linux-image*

    There should be a package with a specific version number in its name. For example, the standard kernel for Debian 11 is:
    linux-image-5.10.0-26-amd64

    Uninstall the linux-image-… package you don’t want to keep.
    Also uninstall linux-image-amd64 which is the meta-package that pulls in the newest kernel version. Without it, you won’t get new kernel versions in upgrades.

    dafunkkk,

    ok, will try Many Thanks!!

    wth,

    I second the advice to switch to a different/previous/known good kernel. That has been the cause a most boot problems for me. I just had it happen on a VM a couple of weeks ago, so I switched to the old kernel, then removed the new kernel. I’ll wait for another kernel before upgrading.

    It’s probably worth scanning your disk just in case as well.

    d3Xt3r, (edited ) in What are you most excited when it comes to linux in 2024?

    Plasma 6, but just as excited for kernel 6.7 featuring:

    • bcachefs
    • AMD Seamless Boot (for flicker-free streamlined booting)
    • Scheduler improvements for better responsiveness/performance
    • IO_uring FUTEX support for better performance
    • More FUTEX2 work for potentially better gaming performance
    • Better write performance for eMMC chips (great for many IoT boards)
    • TCP network performance improvements
    • DisplayPort Alt Mode 2.1 support over Type-C
    acockworkorange,

    What about bcachefs excites you? Like, what does it offer that ext4, Btrfs and zfs don’t?

    d3Xt3r, (edited )

    Initial benchmarks show better performance than btrfs (at least for some workloads), but more importanty, I like that it offers tiered/cache storage - so you can use a fast and small drive (NVMe) to speed up a slow and bigger drive (HDD). You can do that with ZFS as well of course, but it doesn’t have the massive RAM requirements. Also it’s much more easier to set up and configure in comparison.

    bastion,

    It’s like btrfs, but faster, and less prone to data loss.

    acockworkorange,

    Btrfs is data loss prone? OpenSUSE Tumbleweed uses it as default, I assumed it was good enough.

    umbrella,
    @umbrella@lemmy.ml avatar

    Thats why I’m still on trusty old ext4. Dunno if this is true but I dont want to risk data loss.

    PseudoSpock,
    @PseudoSpock@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Ext4 just went through a data loss fix in the kernel, too.

    pbjamm,
    @pbjamm@beehaw.org avatar

    BTRFS is honestly really great and has been for the last few years. Dont take the word of random people on the interwebs, check out some modern sources of info on the subject. Some people love to complain about RAID5/6 but if you use BTRFS the BTRFS way then it is solid.

    With that said, if you dont need snapshots, drive mirroring, sub volumes, bit rot protection etc then EXT4 is hard to beat for reliability.

    acockworkorange,

    Snapshots changed my life. And I don’t exactly demand ultra reliability for my home PC. Thanks for the feedback!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #