linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

onlinepersona, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked

Imagine recommended reddit on “itsfoss”.

maeries, in Issue with Samsung Odyssey G3 and squashed windows after a period of inactivity

What icon pack is that bzw?

ErKaf,

Beziehungsweise

walthervonstolzing, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked
@walthervonstolzing@lemmy.ml avatar

‘should have’ – but didn’t? What happened then?

Deconceptualist,

I had that moment too but I think this is actually intended as “should keep bookmarked”.

walthervonstolzing,
@walthervonstolzing@lemmy.ml avatar

Yeah, I’m sure that was the intention; but the wording is off, so I wanted to take a little jibe at it.

aksdb, in Anyone have experience with Intel Arc GPUs?

I would love to upgrade to one, but from tests I gathered that they have an exceedingly bad idle power draw. Given that the card would idle most of the time, I don’t really want to waste power on it if nvidia and amd manage to stay far lower.

craigevil, in What has been your experience with Flatpak?
@craigevil@lemmy.ml avatar

I use it on my pi400 running rpios Bookworm. Easier to install things like Okular and other apps without installing all of the overhead of KDE/Gnome. Counting the necessary kde/gnome libs I currently have 33 flatpaks installed.

CalicoJack, in What distro for a MacBook pro late 2013 15'

Basically anything should work, I had one for a while running Arch + KDE. Wifi doesn’t work out of the box (thanks Broadcom), but once you install the right driver it’s perfectly fine.

Pantherina,

Wl Kernel mod?

CalicoJack,

That works to get it going, but it’s flaky. The older Broadcom chips need either the old reverse-engineered driver, or the old closed source driver Broadcom released.

grue, in Are older, but Linux compatible computers capable of running the newest kernel/version of various distros?

Linux broke compatibility with 386 back in 2012. The kernel maintainers also began considering dropping compatibility with 486 late last year, but as far as I can tell they haven’t actually gone through with it yet (apparently it’s likely to be coming in 6.2).

So, strictly speaking: yes, almost any computer that was ever capable of running Linux should still be capable of running the newest kernel version, with the sole exception of 386s.

Whether it can actually do anything useful beyond getting to a command prompt on a serial terminal is another issue entirely.

Patch,

They’re dropping support for ia-64 in 6.7, I understand.

Both users will be devastated.

squaresinger,

They actually discontinued quite a few architectures (in total 15 architectures). But all of them where cancelled, because nobody in their right mind is still running them if not for a youtube video.

Sparc Sun-4, SPARCstation and SPARCserver are probably the best-known ones after 386.

Psythik,

So, strictly speaking: yes, almost any computer that was ever capable of running Linux should still be capable of running the newest kernel version, with the sole exception of 386s.

So the 286 and 8086 are still compatible, then? :P

What about chips from other ancient architectures? Can I run the latest version of Linux on a 6502?

grue,

So the 286 and 8086 are still compatible, then? :P

No. My comment was carefully worded: if it could ever run Linux, then it still can (unless it’s a 386). Mainline Linux has always required an MMU, so 8086 and 286 were never capable of running it to begin with! 🤓

chunkyhairball,

This. My spouse is working on an online business and needed a laptop to carry around to do inventory with. I happen to have an old Asus 32-bit Celeron netbook collecting dust, so I gave it a bit of a wipedown, installed the latest version of Debian with XFCE on it, and let them install what they needed from there.

So if you get a 64-bit machine AT ALL, it will absolutely run the latest versions of Linux.

(Why is this a thing?

Lots of computers in industry are very low-spec. They use less power and have fewer requirements. As long as there are people who use that hardware and/or are willing to port fixes and new kernel features to it, it’ll keep getting updates. You only run into the ‘dropped compatibility’ thing when really no one is using it.)

SNFi, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked

Ubuntu blog? GamingOnLinux? Reddit? 🤣 no, thanks. No Ubuntu, I don’t play games, I don’t like Reddit. The other websites I already do unless Explainshell which seems cool for newbies.

DuffmanOfTheCosmos,

I didnt know about Explainshell before this post and it looks like an excellent site to share with some of the greener Linux sysadmins on my team at work. I’ve just set a reminder to share it Monday morning

SNFi,

It’s worth to read the post just to discover this. 😆 Explainshell look good enough to be used not only by newbies, very good hints and explanation with manpages.

federalreverse, (edited ) in this random process was using 25 % cpu is this a virus?
@federalreverse@feddit.de avatar

Uhm, so what’s the name of the binary? This is just a list of open files. I missed that it’s “more”…

db2,

Dude thinks ‘more’ is a virus.

federalreverse,
@federalreverse@feddit.de avatar

Ooh, how’d I miss that…?

fubo,

A process can change its name. If I wanted to make sneaky malware for Linux, I’d have it call itself more or something innocuous too.

The correct answer is “this is not enough information”. Why should a real more process eat ¼ of a core for any substantial amount of time?

Artemis_Mystique,

is there like a competent antivirus i could use: the system is freshly installed and i havent used any shady software; everything from the repo and a hash checked tor browser(I didnt visit any shady site just clearnet browsing)

fubo,

Then it’s probably just more. Again: your post did not contain enough information for anyone to provide an answer to your question.

Antivirus doesn’t do what it promises. The only general solution for a compromised system is a clean reinstall. (This is true in Windows too.)

Artemis_Mystique,

Sorry i was panickin and killed the process this the only screen shot i have

badbytes,

Id recommend you install “top” (I know nix funny names) and if run it, will show processes sortable by resource. But I think you are fine.

elscallr,
@elscallr@lemmy.world avatar

htop and/or btop are more modern user friendly alternatives to the classic top

SoNick,

Ooh, I'd heard of htop but btop is new to me!

elscallr,
@elscallr@lemmy.world avatar

Actually just saw btop mentioned on Lemmy the other day lol

FMT99,

If it’s a virus presumably it will return. Keep an eye (or ear) on your fan, especially after a restart.

bestnerd, in this random process was using 25 % cpu is this a virus?

Maybe? It could be numerous things. Are you using containers? Did an update or upgrade fail? Did you install and or patch something? Anything in sys logs giving off ERR or WARN? What’s your system and distro? What was the last few things you did before this popped?

Artemis_Mystique,

Fedora 38. nothing installed

bestnerd,

What about the other questions?

velox_vulnus, in this random process was using 25 % cpu is this a virus?

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Artemis_Mystique,

    sorry i panicked and killed the process this is the only screenshot ihave, basically my laptop fan was revving high for 1 hour straight, i was doing some text editing and light usage so i didnt think much off it, but i left my system for a while and came back and saw the fan was still revving, thats when i found this process

    velox_vulnus,

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • badbytes,

    “more” allows you to view files. And agreed, if used incorrectly, might cause extra CPU. Generally mistakes like this just become memory hogs.

    Artemis_Mystique,

    Thank you after reading the comments i am relieved: I had saved a 3 page fully worded .odt as as .fodt and opened it with a text editor; but then again all the files had been closed and i deleted the file in question a at least 30 mins before i noticed the process; regardless thank you

    beeng, in What has been your experience with Flatpak?

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • stockRot,

    Flatpaks are integrated into the store. If you’re using fedora.

    If you’re using Ubuntu, then snaps are probably integrated. What I’m trying to say here is that your comment is useless if you’re not going to mention your OS

    neo, in 8 Websites Linux Users Should Have bookmarked
    @neo@lemmy.comfysnug.space avatar

    at least they don’t toot their own horn

    Spider89, in Clevo Laptop doesnt boot any Linux USB sticks? partitions not found, fstab errors and all?

    Debian Live?

    Pantherina,

    I dont think that will change anything. Its not the distros fault, thats the thing. I used these exact ISOs

    Spider89,

    It may be the way the are burned.

    Try using Balena Etcher or Rufus.

    I_like_cats, in What has been your experience with Flatpak?

    Flatpak is good for chat apps and proprietary apps which you don’t want to have full access to your system

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #