What distros have you tried and thought, "Nope, this one's not for me"?
I’ve been using Linux Mint since forever. I’ve never felt a reason to change. But I’m interested in what persuaded others to move.
I’ve been using Linux Mint since forever. I’ve never felt a reason to change. But I’m interested in what persuaded others to move.
MyNameIsRichard, Fedora Core. It had so many problems updating. That would have been in the mid 2000s so it may have improved since then.
EponymousBosh, I’m currently using Linux Mint as well. I tried Garuda out and I did really like it, but the rolling release kept breaking NVIDIA.
I used Ubuntu back in the day but it sucks now. Snaps are the devil’s work.
wgs, Void linux.
I used arch for a couple years, then crux for over 10 years, so I though Void would be a great distro when the systemd drama occured. Tried that, and noped the hell out of it…
- creating/maintaining packages is a pain
- the dev team was awful with newcomers
- system couldn’t handle more than a couple weeks without updates
- it’s an arch wannabe that doesn’t admit it, making it a worse alternative
warmaster, I game a lot, so I need the latest drivers. So anything with a slower release schedule than Manjaro is a no go for me.
GenBlob, Any distro that’s based on an existing one but changes or adds very little to it. There are so many dead Ubuntu and Debian reskins
0x2d, i run arch on my surface
my dell runs kubuntu, but i plan to move it to arch as well (after i back up my data)
i liked it for a while and suddenly had tons of issues with snap, especially with firefox, and webusb breaking constantly on chromium (i use android flash tool a lot)
eric, Fedora, as someone who uses mostly Arch and the AUR, I couldn’t get used copr, flatpak, and dnf. I rather just use yay.
HotChickenFeet, Its a meme at this point, but I tried to install arch. Ran into display issues during install and couldn’t progress. Gave up and did Ubuntu instead.
I know there’s supposed to be some helper stuff out there now to make it go smoothly, but don’t think I am motivated enough to retry ever.
pineapplelover, Ubuntu. I initially downloaded it for my sibling’s pc but now that I’ve downloaded and configured all these things on their computer, I don’t want to reinstall a new OS and reconfigure and download everything again.
Gutless2615, Linux mint waaaaaaay back when it first launched.
haroldstork, Fedora. Fedora is solid, but coming from arch I felt it was lacking so much in the way of the package repos and doing things like secure boot was more effort than it was worth.
heygooberman, (edited ) I used Linux Mint for about 1.5 years before transitioning to Arch Linux. For me, the transition was to learn more about Linux and to try something new. Thus far, I’m really liking Arch. There have been a few issues that have popped up here and there, like getting Bluetooth devices to connect properly, but the Arch Wiki and forums often have the solution. You just have to spend time reading the articles or the forum responses.
As for other distros, I’ve tried Zorin, Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Pop OS, and KDE Neon before settling on Linux Mint.
Montagge, Puppy Linux
AntiX
NixDev, Garuda. Looked pretty and tried it for a day or two and noped out. Went back to Manjaro before I figured out how to install Arch without the installer
Stillhart, Garuda. I tried it because it’s supposed to be “gamer” oriented. I thought it meant it would make it easier/smoother for gaming. What they actually meant was it felt like being locked inside a gaming PC with flashing and spinning RGB lights everywhere. No fucking thanks.
Add comment