captain_aggravated,
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

The Linux Kernel version is at 6 point something, I think they’re working on version 7. That’s not the OS though, the current Ubuntu version under LTS is 22.04. That’s more than twice as much as Windows.

Note I had to get this information from Wikipedia because Ubuntu’s website is currently unusable corporate garbagepuke.

notTheCat,

If my guesses are correct, the major version number of Ubuntu marks the release year

captain_aggravated,
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

Correct; the minor number is also the month. Which is why they’re almost always .04 or .10; the LTS version is always released in April, with non-LTS releases that serve a similar purpose to Debian Unstable (newer package base at the possible expense of more bugs) are released in October. They also have a convoluted codename system, as many point release distros do.

ghterve,

Only the April releases in even years are LTS

princessnorah, (edited )
@princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

You’re not wrong about their website, but it still only took 2 clicks to get that information. For reference, I can’t find it at all on Debian’s website without clicking download and looking at the version number in the filename. But you can get that in one click so I suppose they’re doing better.

Edit: Sorry, I was wrong, you can see it under the Microsoft Azure section after one click:

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/pictrs/image/e7112785-3c53-4e0a-9e79-b84f782b4cd1.png

captain_aggravated,
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

Now try to find Linux Mint’s current version number on their website.

JackRiddle,

Screenshot_20240111_154215_Firefox

On their home page? First thing you see?

captain_aggravated,
@captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works avatar

Exactly.

UncleBadTouch,
@UncleBadTouch@lemmy.ca avatar

but wouldnt lower numbers mean no one needed to fix & revamp a working OS?

higher numbers mean more fuckups than needed to be fixed until it was so broken there was no longer a way to code you way out, had to start right from the start!

AVincentInSpace,

no it just means the OS is abandoned obviously, don’t you know that any library with no commits in the last 20 minutes is not worth using /s

lorty,
@lorty@lemmy.ml avatar

It really depends on what versioning means for the project. If we are talking about semantic versioning then a lower number only means there haven’t been many breaking changes over time. Or that a lot of broken stuff has been kept that way because it would break compatibility.

duncesplayed,

Isn’t it Mac OS X 14? I.e., Mac OS 10.14?

dizzy,
@dizzy@lemmy.ml avatar

No they ditched OSX and yearly point updates in 2020 and went from Mac OSX 10.15.7 to MacOS 11.0

The next yearly release was MacOS 12.

It’s now up to 14.2.1

duncesplayed,

Ah thanks for that! You can tell how long it’s been since I’ve used Mac OS.

sfxrlz,

Do you know why?

Korne127,
@Korne127@lemmy.world avatar

Actually yeah

In 2000, Steve Jobs announced Mac OS X as the operating system for the next 20 years. So they kept the version for 20 years and well… in 2020 they started to make the yearly updates be major version number updates again (instead of minor version numbers).

Also @dizzy

dizzy,
@dizzy@lemmy.ml avatar

Probably just wanted a higher number than windows or didn’t want to get leapfrogged. Also makes more sense with iOS having a similar schedule.

gianmarco,

Fedora 39 anyone?

13617,

Shit takes like 30 minutes to update 😭😭

davemeech,

Smh my head

gerdesj,

My phone is on 23. Nextcloud is on 27.

I’m Arch and so is my wife (actually) and it doesn’t have a version. We just roll … and today my dongled, wireless mouse has stopped moving. The buttons still work and my laptop touchpad works fine.

wtf!

Limit,

They make a pill for that…

theluckyone,

Gentoo. I’d tell you the version number, but I’m still compiling.

tiny,

Tips Fedora 39

Pacmanlives,

Laughs in OpenSuSe 42

milicent_bystandr,

That’s why it’s better than Ubuntu 23

joeldebruijn,

MacOS according to other metrics tho. … xkcd.com/1056/

gregorum,

oldie but a goodie

Late2TheParty,
@Late2TheParty@lemmy.world avatar

There’s always an XKCD about it! I love it!

iAvicenna,
@iAvicenna@lemmy.world avatar

who the fuck made this horrible graphic? when will people realize that grossly redundant features that also complicate interpretation (such as trying to make a bar plot 3d) is absolutely one of the worst things you can do.

v4ld1z,
@v4ld1z@lemmy.zip avatar

Isn’t this kind of the point of the graph?

iAvicenna,
@iAvicenna@lemmy.world avatar

When used correctly the point of the graph is to make use of the fact that humans are super fast at visual convolution tasks but not so great at doing mental statistics. If your graph makes the interpretation of complicated statistical facts immediate for the viewer (and as faithful to the facts as possible, whatever that means) then it has achieved its purpose.

v4ld1z,
@v4ld1z@lemmy.zip avatar

I get that, I know what a graph is, but this is clearly meant as a meme, hence the lacking axis descriptions and scale, and the 3d rendering. It’s literally just a meme

iAvicenna,
@iAvicenna@lemmy.world avatar

hmm I thought it was a meme built on top of a real graph

abeltramo,
@abeltramo@lemmy.world avatar

Wooosh

AgentGrimstone,

macOS still trying to figure it out with attempt

dpkonofa,

It took Microsoft 98 attempts the first time! Then it took them an entire Millennium. Then 2000 attempts after that. And then after 12 more attempts, they’ve decided they need to change the keyboard… I’d say ain’t too bad.

nossaquesapao,

non ironically, firefox did a jump in version numbers after firefox 4 because people were seeing the low number compared to other browsers, and would think they were behind technically.

Acters,

One of those bigger numbers is better herd instincts

toastal, (edited )

While true & I remember folks actually using this in arguments for ‘slow development’, there is some merit to versioning differently for something expected to get minor updates to perpetually follow latest specs such. I can’t imagine trying to discern what a “breaking change” would be in this context. Or would you make a new version for every visual redesign? Dates might have just made more sense, but maybe ESR is easier to follow with the current scheme.

TrivialBetaState,

Windows will reach 12 this year. Double score!

WashedOver, (edited )
@WashedOver@lemmy.ca avatar

I recall at one point Windows 10 was going to be the last version of the OS and they would just maintain that. I’m wondering if they said that to get the last of the Windows 7 and XP users to finally move to 10?

ultranaut,

Windows 11 is kind of technically still just Windows 10 under the hood.

TheFriendlyDickhead, (edited )

And on the hood too. They realy didn’t change that much. Made a few things “simpler” aka worse and that’s it

words_number,

Hahaha so true

Stillhart,

Windows was still DOS under the hood for a long time. Win 98 was Win 95. Win 8 was Win 7. This is nothing new for MS.

TheRedSpade,

That was never the company’s official stance. One (non-spokesperson) employee said it once, and people ran with it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #