memes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Samsy, in Don't ask

The US about indigenous Americans.

Oh wait, they made hundreds of movies about killing them.

kfc,

That really is one of the most absurd things about the American Empire. They’ll come and destroy your people, taint and corrupt your land with bones and blood, bomb you back into the stone age, and then make a trillion dollar budget film about how it made them feel sad. The othering is so powerful that emotions only exist within the walls of capital

2Password2Remember, in Don't ask

imagine believing tiananmen square is in any way comparable to the rest of this list. OP showing their whole ass

Death to America

littlecolt,

Smooth-brained western Chinese apologists is not what I was expecting from the future of the internet even 5 years ago. Our atrocities are totally cool, eh? Nice.

FuckyWucky,

yeah, next the internet will be defending Iraqi incubator babies or Saddam’s people-shredder.

also, very rude of you to assume im a mayo western cracker.

vivadanang, in They never admit they were just wrong

“any moment now anyone who got the vax is gonna flop over and start foaming at the mouth, I heard it on the My Pillow Guy show.”

I can’t decide which is more depressing, people stupid enough to believe the shit, or the absurd lack of credibility their sources provide - fucking rubes and idiotic liars deserve each other I guess.

Polar,

If the government wanted to kill people, they’d kill those who refused to comply.

So the thing that would make more sense, is that the COVID vaccine was an antidote, and the government was going to release a toxic gas to kill everyone who didn’t take it.

But nah, their argument is that the government is killing those who comply. Ya, because that makes sense.

Misconduct,

When you point out its been a long time, and you’re fine, so they say, “Give it 10 more years” lmao wtf just shut up and crawl back under your rock you science denying turnips

Jay,

And then when you die in 50 years after a long and healthy life: “I told you so!”

IHaveTwoCows,

Nearly every case I heard about the vax killing people was somebody who was 79 and had poor heart health

merc,

Meanwhile virtually every possible (and infrequent) side-effect of the vaccine is also a possible (and frequent) side-effect of COVID.

Like, cardiac issues are possible, very rare side effects of the vaccine. Cardiac issues are common side effects of getting COVID. So, even if you’re really worried about one specific side-effect of the vaccine like pulmonary embolism – guess what, you’re much more likely to have one if you don’t get the vaccine because then you’re much more likely to get it as a COVID side-effect.

Misconduct,

I think I’d survive covid decently but the long covid some people ended up with sounds horrifying. Like the people that have had their sense of taste all fucky for years. I love food too much to take that risk. Also, I’d never forgive myself if I found out I carried it around and potentially gave it to others that might not survive it. A few little shots and a little mask are really nothing compared to potentially killing someone’s memaw. It takes so little effort to just not catch it or spread it around people are ridiculous.

Nioxic, in EVs

Public transport is awesome…

It just doesnt always go where everyone needs to go

Bikes are great right until you have to do large grocery shopping or get to a place far away.

I cant do without a car where i live.

Liz,

You live in a place designed around cars, that’s the problem. Society worked fine without cars for a good long while. We could have adopted trains, bikes, and buses without the car and things would be going swimmingly. The idea is to fix our bad town planning so that it’s reasonable to get to any destination using any mode if transportation.

ProxyTheAwesome, in Don't ask

One of these is not like the other

Gorilladrums,

You’re right, asking a woman her age is not an atrocity

OceanSoap, in Don't ask

It’s almost like every government commits atrocities at some point or another.

GarbageShoot,

Let us look at a specific example. A claim like “There’s cultural genocide of Uyghurs in Xinjiang” is simply unreal to most Westerners, close to pure gibberish. The words really refer to existing entities and geographies, but Westerners aren’t familiar with them. The actual content of the utterance as it spills out is no more complex or nuanced than “China Bad,” and the elementary mistakes people make when they write out statements of “solidarity” make that much clear. This is not a complaint that these people have not studied China enough — there’s no reason to expect them to study China, and retrospectively I think to some extent it was a mistake to personally have spent so much time trying to teach them. It’s instead an acknowledgment that they are eagerly wielding the accusation like a club, that they are in reality unconcerned with its truth-content, because it serves a social purpose.

What is this social purpose? Westerners want to believe that other places are worse off, exactly how Americans and Canadians perennially flatter themselves by attacking each others’ decaying health-care systems, or how a divorcee might fantasize that their ex-lover’s blooming love-life is secretly miserable. This kind of “crab mentality” is actually a sophisticated coping mechanism suitable for an environment in which no other course of action seems viable. Cognitive dissonance, the kind that eventually spurs one into becoming intolerant of the status quo and into action, is initially unpleasant and scary for everybody. In this way, we can begin to understand the benefit that “victims” of propaganda derive from carelessly “spreading awareness.” Their efforts feed an ambient propaganda haze of controversy and scandal and wariness that suffocates any painful optimism (or jealousy) and ensuing sense of duty one might otherwise feel from a casual glance at the amazing things happening elsewhere. People aren’t “falling” for atrocity propaganda; they’re eagerly seeking it out, like a soothing balm.

redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

centof, in Would the world be a better place if Christians acted upon their beliefs?

Your mistake comes in assuming christians have coherent beliefs. They largely believe what everyone else around them believes. In the US this means they are mostly captured by the grifters of society which are coincidentally the capitalists. Funny how that works.

For the rare exceptions you can point look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_socialism.

bleistift2,

I am well-aware that Christianity isn’t self-consistent. This was luckily part of my religious education in school and my edition of the Bible even points out contradictions.

To be honest, the title is only there to feign a discussion, since I didn’t want to be too overtly anti-religious.

cduke23,

R.E. as in the UU?

bleistift2,

RE as in Religious education. I don’t know what “UU” means.

cduke23,

Yeah the Unitarian Universalists also use the term Religious Education for Sunday School.

bleistift2,

Then I’ll try another attempt at my answer. “Religious education”, as I use the term, is the class you take from primary school all the way through to your graduation in High School, if your denomination is covered by the school you attend. It’s the default for baptized children in the German state I went to school in. If your denomination is not covered (or you just don’t want R.E.), you can attend a class called “Ethics.” You must attend either your Religious Education class or Ethics.

CrowAirbrush, in EVs

Yeah but everyone “needs” an e bike nowadays, which compared to regular bikes is another step back.

sour,

If it makes the difference between someone using a bike and not using a bike, it’s still a step forward.

Zacryon, in just a headpat

I don’t want a pat on the head. I want to overthrow capitalism in its current form and revolutionize our society for the benefit of all and not only a few.

Rozauhtuno,
@Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

I want both.

Ilovethebomb, in I'll get there one day.

When trying to achieve equality, it takes far less work to drag one group down than to lift another group up to an equal level.

This is the crux of why Communism typically achieved worse outcomes than other systems.

domdom,

Yes, eliminating hyper greed will result is less hoarded wealth. So uh yeah, one guy won’t own 7 mansions.

Ilovethebomb,

Yeah, that’s the part that hasn’t happened historically. Usually it turns into eat the middle class.

CyberEgg,

Because with capitalism we have such a large middle class now.

sederx,

Middle class is not a thing.

craftyindividual, in Like a boss

Ah the Newport Sex Scandal. The Dollop covered it well.

maiskanzler,

The wiki page has a “History” segment and right below that… "In Fiction"💘🤠

Pissnpink, in Beware fellow heathens

And both end up kinda tasting like shit.

TheFriendlyDickhead,

Self cooked food can actually taste good. Fast food on the other hand will allways taste bad.

tfw_no_toiletpaper,

Do y’all just order fast food on Uber eats, I don’t get it? 50% of the time I order like Vietnamese, Indian or Japanese. Not McDonalds lol. Costs like 15€ (edit: +5€ delivery, I forgot since I had some 0 cost program once) instead of 3-4€ self cooked but it’s usually some Sunday afternoon where I am too lazy to get up and do anything myself.

blanketswithsmallpox, in Lemmy users are like
@blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social avatar

How dare the public not want to hear about us stripping the rights of gays, and trans people? ECHO CHAMBER! I JUST WANT CIVIL DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW BLACK PEOPLE ARE NOTHING BUT THUGS AND RAPISTS AND THEY SHOULD GO BACK TO AFRICA.

How about no dude? Go back to Truth Social and rant there. Nobody wants to hear about your eugenics, how a female comic artist hurts your browsing experience and you're too contrarian not to spew misogynist rhetoric.

Progressives and most real moderates know better now. It's all bad-faith arguments and dog whistles. The paradox of tolerance is real and people need to stop platforming insanity.

Gorilladrums,

God nothing is more annoying than brain damaged American progressives who think they’re intellectuals. Even if we ignore your strawman, the very idea that there are people who are close minded enough to actually actively refuse to even be exposed to any ideas that they might dislike or disagree with is insane. Keep in mind, the tolerance paradox says that intolerant ideas shouldn’t be tolerated, it doesn’t say that you should go full 1984 censoring and controlling information and turning authoritarian on anything you deem intolerant. The whole point of the paradox is to demonstrate that if a society wants to remain free and democratic, then it needs to oppose intolerance and authoritarianism in all its forms… via democratic processes. Otherwise, it’s another society that has become corrupted. The principles of liberty and democracy, as well as their universality, should never be abandoned.

Scribbd,

I hate you. I despise you so deeply that I will use all my capital to move the democratic process. I am going to use the freedom you have given me to manipulate everyone into thinking you are the scum of the earth, unworthy of existence. I will demonize your actions on every turn. I will destroy you, your culture, and your very existentce. I just have to yell it long and hard enough and people will flock to my voice that I have been given on your platforms. And you will do nothing about it, even when you manage to expose my lies. It is you that is the cause of all our problems we face. Soon enough people just repeat what I say and believe me over anything you might utter. I have just convinced people of what you truly are. And their vote will sign your death warrant.

Gorilladrums,

My point still stands. You can’t use hate, ignorance, and authoritarianism to defeat hate, ignorance, and authoritarianism. The only thing that will end up happening is you turning hateful, ignorant, and authoritarian. We have already seen this happen time and time again. It’s time for people to learn from history for once instead of just repeating it. Censorship NEVER works, authoritarianism NEVER works. The very reason why the people you described ever get into power is because of people like you who fall into a brainless cycle of purity tests, arrogance, and exploitation of power. You want to see bigots stop being bigots? Try talking to them. Not talk down to them, not convince them of anything, just try to understand why they think the way they do, how they came to be, and how they perceive the world. By understanding them you can find some common ground and from there you can introduce to them alternative ideas like tolerance, justice, coexistence, and peace. You can’t ban bigots, you can’t censor them, you can’t genocide them, and no amount of power abused will make them go away. Talking them is the only way. Keep mind talking to them isn’t a sign of weakness or a concession. Virtue signaling means fuck all when it makes things worse. Talking to people, having them exposed to new ideas and views, and treating people you don’t like (even if they’re vile) as humans is how a black man in the US managed to convince dozens of KKK klansmen into giving up their robes.

Scribbd,

Because those people who gave up their robes saw that they were misguided and were open to new ideas. But some still have kept their hearts closed because some are just unwilling to have their convictions changed. KKK is still a thing, after all that talking. Raceism is still an issue, even when we tried giving them space.

Sometimes it is more than misguidence. Sometimes people just hate, and grudge. And when these people are given power they are able to spread their hate and misguide once more. And then we might have another Nazi Germany, where it will take a war to have it corrected. We didn’t get the Nazi’s to stop with just words. Are we able to have China stop doing it now, with just words? Are words helping in Palestina?

And in this day and age of the internet, even when we show those people the world that they can access. Show them how misguided their hatred is. They still choose to hate.

These words I wrote are in their hearts. Outside they tell sweet veiled words like ‘we must protect our children’ and ‘they are taking your jobs’. They will convince people against all facts, that the others chose this. That something genetic, is chosen. Never will they tell in those clear words what they truly want, because any sane moral person would see it for what it is.

At some point they manage to convince their followers that they are the truth, that anyone trying to guide them away to sanity is lying to them. And then the cycle completes and new unchangable hate-ist is born to spread the infection. See anti-vaxxers, see Q, see any conspiracy group that convinces their members everyone else is lying.

So, would you rather have a tyranny where people are allowed to just be. But where ideas of raceism and exclusion is censored.

Or a tyranny of the hateful that will one day knock on your door for telling the lies of inclusion?

runblack, in Let the hunt begin

Lol thats literally what I say to the flies. But my death/hit ratio is probably 0.3.

thetreesaysbark,

When they fly away they first fly up and backwards. So if you come at them from this angle you’ll hit them a lot more often.

Source: something rotted in my bin.

Willy, in download firefox

as someone who used firefox for the last 20 years or more, I just switched to edge about 6 months ago and I’ve been liking it.

KorokSpaceProgram,
@KorokSpaceProgram@artemis.camp avatar

That’s just Chrome

Holzkohlen,

Or as I have recently taken to calling it Microsoft plus Chrome.
Do two negatives make a positive? Clearly not. Checkmate matheists.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #