No questions. I rode with the furries for quite awhile so I know basically everything there is to know about human-animal hybrids. And human-plant hybrids. And human-machine hybrids. Even a little about human-fungus hybrids. Crazy world of variety if you know where to look.
Well, for your standard “horse body” centaurs, they’re typically depicted as both being in the back. But this picture seems to be using human legs, so it’s basically the interpretation of the original artist (but my guess would be same as a standard centaur because vag-in-front centaurs don’t show up in art very much)
because vag-in-front centaurs don’t show up in art very much.
I’m a bit curious how you know this, but I’m just gonna flag you as a centaur anatomy expert and refrain from asking questions I don’t want the answer to.
You’re currently in violation of the oldest, most sacred rule of secret-sharing, and recommend you amend that per your obligation to the social contract, as a matter of principle.
Serious question though, is it a render or AI? I’m inclined to think render because of the consistency for both front and rear views of the same model, usually AI slips up and makes things somewhat different. Thoughts?
idk I’m no expert but generating something that doesn’t actually exist with AI often leads to unexpected/unwanted results. How would you even make a prompt for this? “Woman with four legs”? Good luck with that.
<span style="color:#323232;">create an image of a human on all fours but the parts above the chest are replaced with another human in standing position
</span>
Bing image creator just fails to create an image at all
Your prompt has got to be more descriptive. For example “woman centaur, human legs”. However this prompt is simply generating women on horseback for me. It’s hard for AI to imagine a horse with human legs.
How does she sleep? Does she stand like a horse to sleep? Or does she have a way to lay down? Like, that leg design would be awful on the human spine. With that said 10/10 for something original.
If you look closely, it seems like she has hooves, not human feet, so the internal structure is probably still mostly horse-like from the waist down, she just has human skin and no fur
Horses cant wipe either but they do fine in terms if the smell. The trick is that they have an anus designed to prolapse a few inches so that the feces only ever comes into contact with the rectum and never exterior tissues.
If you haven’t bought a bidet (like $50-100 and a few minutes to install) or shower every time you poop, you are probably covered in feces right now. Toilet paper alone is kind of gross.
… I did know before reading the post the reason we as humans are the only ones who wipe. Where did I learn this? From you (the internet) of course. Where else xD
I mean, it’s like grade 3 level English. People can tell what you meant but that’s because it’s so common that so many people make such simple mistakes. Educate yourself ffs.
It doesn’t matter how common the written error is, because the ambiguity is omnipresent in speech and we sort it out every day of our lives, so it will always be easy as fuck.
FYI, both of you are overacting. It’s weird to react to the correction so seriously, but equally weird for you to get so offended by the error. Both of you be better.
Add comment