TigrisMorte,

I think it more likely that they are sick of the idiot love triangle crutch which so many productions desperately wedge into films it has no place in.

NoSleep,

This article tells us nothing as it isn’t comparing the results to other age groups. The study it cites might though.

Kolanaki,
@Kolanaki@yiffit.net avatar

I’m a horny af millennial and I also don’t really care for sex scenes. They add nothing to the story itself, and they don’t show enough to be sexy. If you’re not going to show full penetration then don’t even bother.

sir_pronoun,

I think none of you have seen Irreversible.

Veraxus, (edited )
@Veraxus@kbin.social avatar

I'm with Gen Z on this. Hell, I've have been complaining about this since I was a kid in the 80s. You do not need every damn relationship to be a romance. People can be friends and acquaintances and frienemies and enemies and everything in-between without there being romance or sex.

Hole,

Or they can be in love without it being explored when it’s of no value to the story. Movies seldom ever include established couples just treating them normally.

Hole,

Ripe gen Z elder at 25 here. Glad to know others from my generation feel the same. I hate romance. Well done romance is fine, but it’s a unicorn. Sex scenes are also cringe. I’m very much not a prude, merely film makers either fail to make a good one and/or it adds nothing of value or straight up subtracts.

paddirn,

Porn is porn, I’ll watch that when I want in private. If I’m watching a movie/tv show, I’m watching it for the content, for the storyline or whatever, adding shitty softcore porn to it just dilutes it and makes it unwatchable around friends/family. One of my gripes with Game of Thrones (not high compared to everything else wrong with it) was all the shitty sex scenes they added, which required them to cut out even more content than before. With only ~10 hours per season, they didn’t have alot of time to dick around, but they spent alot of time… dickin’ around.

anewbeginning,

I’m gen y and I agree. Skip the shitty softcore.

massive_bereavement,
@massive_bereavement@kbin.social avatar

Exactly. If you want to show it, they should show everything.

Full penetration.

Silverseren,

This seems unlikely considering the massive number of popular teen romance shows happening, such as Heartstopper. It's just that any sex scenes need to have actual depth behind them when they happen, not just random sex out of nowhere.

brewbellyblueberry,

Yeah I wouldn’t even agree with the depth, it’s not like all the braindead yet-another-american-high-school-dramas with no substance ever went anywhere, no plot, no nothing, just the same regurgitated melodrama and idiocy dressed for yet another generation. Even shows that would be actually great apparently need to have some bullshit drama and gratuitous sex in it for absolutely no reason at all.

SkyeStarfall,

I’d be a sucker for meaningful queer sex and romance that actually looks and feels as it does in real life. I just rarely even really relate to the on-screen happenings for most.

Or, hell, even some good and sensual BDSM type play would be probably very welcome. I don’t know if I’ve seen any of that yet.

emerica,

There’s some BDSM dom/sub kinda stuff in Billions. At least in the first few season, tapered off in the later seasons because of story developments. But it even had a place in the story since the character was a public figure and didn’t want it to be public knowledge.

Lath,

I'm the gen that saw couples having sex butt-naked on the kitchen counter in a random movie at 3-4 in the afternoon. And all i remember now of that movie is that i don't like seeing guys butts.

PlasmaDistortion, (edited )

The problem is many filmmakers use romance/relationships/gender/identity as a filler that really doesn’t add to the story. This is compounded when it feels more like pandering to an audience.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • movies@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #