piracy

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Anticorp, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

“Own it now!”

No thanks!

Duamerthrax,

Not even worth pirating.

Blackmist, (edited ) in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

Out already? Can’t be long before Radarr delivers it then.

Oh, and Ferrari.

Does Radarr have to be running at the exact moment a site adds it? I notice it auto downloads some things but not others.

blazeknave,

Your settings include frequency to search. At least with Prowlarr, you can set that on a per tracker basis iirc.

ryannathans,

No, there are no push notifications. I think it uses periodically refreshed RSS feeds

reverendsteveii, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

How can they get away with lying like this?

The own* the people who decide what they can get away with.

*as in actually own, not their single-instance redefinition of “own” where it means ‘definitely do not own’

leaky_shower_thought, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

When you click “buy” or “purchase” on a video on Amazon Prime, you’re not actually coming into ownership of that movie of TV show. Instead, you’re merely paying for a limited license for “on-demand viewing over an indefinite period of time", as warned in the very small print on the company’s website.

GamesRadar

they can get away apparently because of this very small print.

yarr-har-fiddle-dee-dee/ if you love to sail the seeries of tubes

Mouselemming, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

Wait, you mean I don’t actually own Jason Momoa now? What about my kingdom, do I still own that? (It’s hard to tell, since it’s lost.)

thanks_shakey_snake,

You merely own a license that allows you to access Jason Momoa.

WashedOver, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.
@WashedOver@lemmy.ca avatar

I feel like an outsider on these debates. I totally agree we should be able to own forever.

In my case I find there is so much new TV and movies I rarely go back to re-watch shows or movies so owning them isn’t on my radar. It’s a challenge just to watch a whole series I find.

I’m wondering how often do people beyond kids re-watch movies and TV shows? Kids seem to be able to rewatch the same movies several times a day…

Rolando,

I’m wondering how often do people beyond kids re-watch movies and TV shows?

You should become acquainted with The Office fandom. Some of them have it on permanent repeat.

anothermember,

For me it’s preparing for future nostalgia, I want to be able to just "have it’ to look back on. It may sound strange to some people I guess but I can’t properly get “invested” in a show/movie/game without the knowledge that I’ll be able to rewatch it again, maybe at some point when I’m in my 80s and feel nostalgic about it. It’s a major barrier to my enjoyment in the present. It’s like why people take photos of things. 99% of what I would torrent are things I have access to now, that I would happily pay through the nose for if I could just own it in a DRM-free format.

Tenthrow,
@Tenthrow@lemmy.world avatar

I rewatch movies ALL THE TIME, especially during Christmas and Halloween. There are a couple of other films that I put on consistently as a comfort watch (The Guest, Dread, etc.). I have watched entirely though all 3 Stargate Series at least 3 times each. My wife and I often rewatch Psych and The office. I have watched through all of the Star Trek series at least 4 times each. I am on my 5th or 6th time through Futurama. I have watched Fringe twice at least. Twice through X-Files. I don’t know how many times I have watched Firefly. My wife has been through Friends at least 5 times. And she has watched Murder She Wrote (the entire series) probably 30 times. I have watched Columbo in its entirely no less than 3 times.

db2, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

They didn’t cut Amber out, I won’t be watching it at any price including free.

limitedduck,

They didn’t cut her out, but her role is greatly diminished compared to the first movie. It’s really a buddy comedy between Aquaman and Orm where one is almost literally a fish out of water

db2,

Still has her in it though. After what Hollywood did to Johnny based on hearsay and seeing them barely do half that when it was demonstrated that she’s a crazy liar, nope.

Chainweasel, (edited ) in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

If they’re saying “own” on their advertisements then they should be required to refund you when they eventually have to take it away. I’m pretty sure “ownership” has a legal definition and it’s probably not too ambiguous.
It should at least be considered false advertising if they can’t guarantee access permanently.

Imgonnatrythis,

Oh, whoops. I read it as them explicitly telling me to pirate it. Yeah of course they aren’t going to let you actually own it. That doesn’t come close to making sense.

cyberpunk007,

“rent a license for 15 years”

Gormadt,
@Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

That’s the best part

They redefine “own” and “buy” in their TOS

And so do many many other online retailers that sell digital goods

NOOBMASTER,

ok that makes me sick

takeda,

I wonder if that would hold in court. They could simply use “rent” or “lease” in their ads, but they purposely are trying to mislead to imply permanence.

Mirodir,

Or “watch”. That way they don’t have to make it obvious that their customers won’t own it but still don’t straight up lie.

Anticorp,

Anything holds in court when you have more money than several small nations combined.

blanketswithsmallpox,

Then it’s not binding and they’re just waiting for the class action. Which will win, but they’ll still be richer in the end.

morrowind,
@morrowind@lemmy.ml avatar

They actually never mention the idea of you owning content in their tos www.primevideo.com/help?nodeId=202095490&view-typ…

It’s “purchased digital content”

(iii) purchase Digital Content for on-demand viewing over an indefinite period of time (“Purchased Digital Content”)

Auli,

Which is exactly like physical media. You never owned it you bought a license to view it on that particular disk. But it also had limitations put on it.

Gradually_Adjusting,
@Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world avatar

If license ownership rights with digital custodians were as good as they are with discs, there would be no conversation happening right now. The difference now is that custodians will occasionally snap a finger and disappear your stuff, and you have no recourse.

anonymouse, (edited )

It’s not “exactly like” physical media. The license portion is a similar concept. But the difference is that the variables that determine whether I can keep watching the content whenever I want, in perpetuity, lie solely with me as the person who physically possesses the media. The corporation from which I purchased the license can’t unilaterally decide to revoke my access to the content.

_sideffect, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

“Feel like you own it NOW”

thanks_shakey_snake,

“…for NOW”

ANIMATEK, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAWHAHAHAHAHQHAHAHAHAHAHQHQHhahaahahahahahahahahahahahahahaahah………………

danekrae, (edited ) in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.

Nobody with enough money has sued… Yet…

takeda,

That sounds more like what class action lawsuit is supposed to be for.

Imgonnatrythis,

Damn straight. I want my $7.50!

takeda,

Those are more to punish companies and change their behavior, which I think is what was desired here.

Of course they are a gold mine if you are a lawyer.

grue, (edited )

This sort of blatant violation of the First Sale Doctrine shouldn’t even require a lawsuit to stop; the FTC should prosecute companies for it proactively. We need to demand our government start doing its goddamn job again.

BlueSnail,

Ross Scott of Accursed Farms is planning a lawsuit for something similar www.pcgamesn.com/…/servers-shutdown-lawsuit

brbposting,

“I’m getting a lot of multi-page emails about possible legal proceedings and dozens of people claiming they have receipts,” Ross says. “I do want to emphasize that if I don’t get the help I need, then there will be no fundraiser, there will be no lawsuit, and this practice will continue unchallenged, at least in the US.”

Ross needs your help, lawyers!

krimson, in Amazon clearly lying about "ownership" on Prime.
@krimson@feddit.nl avatar

Did you click on it? Maybe it links to a torrent :D

Kingofthezyx, in it sure beats having to buy it, but seriously come on...

Bitch you can’t ctrl-F or click to chapter in an actual book either.

empireOfLove2,
@empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

I know, that’s my point! PDF’s are inherently superior BECAUSE you can usually CTRL-F them.

JackbyDev,

Wait until OP hears about the Index at the back of the book.

Randomgal, in Microsoft Copilot Pro

You also might not need CoPilot. You can just ask GPT yo produce an airline for the presentation, ith the information you provide, You could even ask it to leave placeholders for images.

It won’t be an award winning presentation, but if you don’t care too much, GPT mass pretty average presentations.

lanolinoil, in it sure beats having to buy it, but seriously come on...
@lanolinoil@lemmy.world avatar
nameisnotimportant,
@nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml avatar

Very impressive! That’s a bummer that you need Chrome to make it happen though :/

lanolinoil,
@lanolinoil@lemmy.world avatar

It will still work on PDFs loaded in Chrome to be fair though.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #