privacyguides

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Tundra, (edited ) in What's the most private way to create and use Instagram?

I use GrapheneOS, I run Instagram in a seperate user profile within its own storage scope alongside an app called “Tracker Control” and block most trackers that way.

trackercontrol.org

ViciousTurducken,

So you are forgoing using a VPN?

Tundra,

On the “meta” user profile yes, blocking trackers is more important than hiding my IP for that user profile

Fizz, in UK police urged to double use of facial recognition software
@Fizz@lemmy.nz avatar

With every single piece of news I read I’m glad I’m not living in the uk. It seems over the last 10 years it’s been getting more and more dystopian

throws_lemy,
@throws_lemy@lemmy.nz avatar

Remember the Fifth of November

moistclump, in Police in Canada look into tech that accesses your home security cameras

Oh Neptune.

moreeni, in Wrf is wrong with UK?

“communism 2.0” proceeds to link an article about a leading capitalist country

Devjavu,

Hah

ilega_dh,

communism is when someone does something I don’t like >:((((((

QuazarOmega,
ExtremeDullard,
@ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org avatar

So is it like communism 1.0?

Communism is the oppression of man by man. Capitalism is the reverse.

ntzm,

Communism is when people are mean to me

relevants,

Like when Covid lockdowns were causing shortages and every right winger said “this is what life under socialism would look like” without a hint of irony

Anticorp,

I saw one that said “this is what life under Bernie Sanders would be like”. The person who posted it couldn’t compute that no, this is literally life under your beloved trumpy-poo. This is literally happening now, it’s not some hypothetical situation.

smeg, in Wrf is wrong with UK?

What’s wrong is that the Tory government has been in power for over a decade and thinks they can get away with increasingly authoritarian legislation like this

Anticorp,

Not “thinks”, they are getting away with it.

Sheeple, in Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

YouTube is going to lose this battle lol.

Both from a legal standpoint and the fact that adblockers WILL adapt

lowleveldata,

Even with Google money?

yukichigai,
@yukichigai@kbin.social avatar

Not even Microsoft in its monolith days was able to spend enough money to stop a legion of angry nerds with a severe case of "fuck you, you can't tell me what to do".

Alby003,
@Alby003@lemmings.world avatar

Nice imagination.

echo64,

So, they’ve already won. They just haven’t turned on the nuclear option yet.

They recently added what amounts to drm for the entire Internet to chrome, it is a way for them to disallow access to YouTube and other services via anything but an approved browser. This would include approved extensions.

So I’ll use something that isn’t chrome? Well, they will just block Firefox from YouTube. Making chrome and chrome derivatives via its Internet drm the only option.

MonkderZweite,

They recently added what amounts to drm for the entire Internet to chrome

This will be legally challenged later, if it is not opt-in.

echo64,

Eh, probably. But it’s for fighting those darned internet pirates, and the only body that seems to protect us anymore, the eu, seems to be all for that. So I’m.not expecting anything good

maynarkh,

What makes you think the EU is for internet monopolies after the DMA?

echo64,

They are all for copyright protection, the current copyright reform act proposes automatic scanners installed to prevent copywritten content from being displayed without authorization

Gabu,

If they want their services to instantly die, sure.

SendMePhotos,

Ah, you forget that the general population is perfectly OK with inconveniences.

Fizz,
@Fizz@lemmy.nz avatar

Majority of people already use chrome

yukichigai,
@yukichigai@kbin.social avatar

That would be easy to challenge under the same reasoning as what's in the article, not to mention various anti-trust laws and ones covering anti-competitive business practices.

Doesn't mean it's guaranteed to stop them, but it's definitely not going to be as easy as them flipping a few switches and saying "watch ads on our browser with no addons or GTFO".

Sheeple,
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

Most importantly, such a move would kill YouTube as a platform. Removing other browsers from the picture would cut off a majority of their viewers

echo64,

Safari and chrome have the Web drm already. It’s really just Firefox that gets cut off.

query,

A monopoly trying to lock in browsers isn’t going to last in the EU.

stolid_agnostic,

Or even the US. Microsoft lost that one in the late 90s.

ultratiem, (edited )
@ultratiem@lemmy.ca avatar

They killed Netscape and had to put in a toggle with the option of other browsers like 10 years later. They paid next to nothing in fines and legal battles, basically putting a stranglehold on the internet itself that took another 10 to kinda of undo.

Not sure if that’s a “loss.”

stolid_agnostic,

Wrong decade. We’re talking about having internet explorer pre installed on windows 95 and 98. It was a really big antitrust thing.

umbrella,
@umbrella@lemmy.ml avatar

microsoft is pulling all their dirty tricks from the 90s unchecked rn.

echo64,

Ehh maybe, widevine exists for drm already. They will just claim its an extension of that.

NocturnalMorning,

So I’ll use something that isn’t chrome? Well, they will just block Firefox from YouTube.

Fast track to getting people to stop using YouTube. No service or company is immune to this.

whale,
@whale@lemm.ee avatar

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Sheeple,
    @Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • hiddengoat,

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • einfach_orangensaft,

    Nope i doubt that. Google is ‘to big to fail’ its a fundamental pillar of american force projection in the cyberspace.

    MasterBuilder,

    Anti-trust lawsuit in 3… 2…

    haui_lemmy,

    I hope they get annihilated by that lawsuit.

    Vendul,

    I don‘t even worry. Some clever dudes will find a way to spoof Chrome with a Firefox extension

    echo64,

    It’s a drm system, so we’re talking end to end encryption from server to display, but for evil. It’s not a spoof thing

    AphoticDev,
    @AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    Even in the US, a corporate monopoly trying to force people to use their browser will trigger an antitrust lawsuit from the government. Microsoft has already faced one for what they did with Edge, and they didn’t even do DRM.

    Besides, it’s YouTube. If you can’t use it anymore, it’s not gonna be the end of the world.

    echo64,

    It’s not that simple, it’s not forcing everyone to use chrome, it’s denying access to copyrighted material to drmed browsers only. This is something that already happens and no one seems to want to break things up around that. Infaft they seem to legislate more for that.

    And sure today it’s youtube, but this is actually a form of drm for everything. Today youtube tomorrow everything else.

    Marin_Rider,

    we’re going to go back to needing “apps” for everything on desktops soon. desktop covered in shortcuts for every shitty service we need to use.

    God this passes me off

    AphoticDev,
    @AphoticDev@lemmy.dbzer0.com avatar

    People are acting as if losing YouTube and other Google services is the end of the world. It is not. You don’t need Google, even if you use Android.

    Tygr,

    I stopped using Chrome about 3 weeks ago. Used Edge for a while but finding out that is Chromium, I landed back on Firefox after 10 years of not using it. Just moved all my bookmarks and plugins.

    Why? Principles the moment people force me to use their software is the moment I leave.

    perviouslyiner, in Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection

    Hopefully it would also apply to websites which port scan your computer.

    LiveLM,

    Why adblockers are essential in a nutshell ⤴️

    Hamartiogonic,
    @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz avatar

    Ironically, that website uses a reader blocker.

    db2, in Lemmy is most censored social media than instagram,facebook,reddit,etc...

    Cry more, snowflake. People not wanting to put up with cryptofascist bullshit isn’t censorship, it’s karma bitch.

    Devjavu,

    Didn’t read OP, what does this have to do with crypto?

    Gazumi, in Lemmy is most censored social media than instagram,facebook,reddit,etc...

    Same clown commenting about censorship here too. C’mon clown, downvote this the same way you have in the other post

    Alby003,
    @Alby003@lemmings.world avatar

    Mind your words 😒

    Devjavu,

    Or what? You wanna jump through his screen you goblin?

    eneff,

    Are you trying to censor him?!

    SaltySalamander,
    @SaltySalamander@kbin.social avatar

    Kindly go fuck yourself, bridge troll.

    crimsdings, in Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection

    I filed the same complaint at the Austrian data privacy agency and asked them to coordinate with the Irish one. You should do the same in your European nation.

    Tygr, in Privacy advocate challenges YouTube's ad blocking detection

    Anyone have family call them after finding out blocking ads on YT is even possible?

    I think all this is causing a bit of Streisand effect. Now even more will be blocking ads.

    leraje, in Wrf is wrong with UK?
    @leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

    “A lot” is the answer to your question. But communism is not one of the things we’re having to deal with at the moment. Quite the opposite in fact.

    badgrandpa,
    @badgrandpa@lemmy.world avatar

    Censorship is one of the characteristics of communism.

    leraje,
    @leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone avatar

    It’s characteristic of all forms of totalitarian leadership. The communism/UK comparison is wrong because we don’t have a ruling party that shares any of the main traits of communism.

    lameJake,

    Maybe do your research first before claiming to know something. Communism at it’s core is when no private property exist and basically everything is “owned” by the whole community equally. Hence the name communism. Censorship has nothing to do with that. It just so happens every state which was “communistic” (none of these really were communistic) had strong censorship. This is what we call correlation. What you mean is causality which means there is proof the two observation are directly linked.

    SaltySalamander, in Lemmy is most censored social media than instagram,facebook,reddit,etc...
    @SaltySalamander@kbin.social avatar

    Fucking LOL

    dtc, in Using Facebook/Meta Messenger on Android

    I’ve had this “problem” before, and I did not want to use the full Messenger app for privacy reasons as well. I had installed Messenger Lite, but it was discontinued a few weeks ago. I now have Facebook Lite, which also has Messenger, and you get notifications as well. It’s not perfect, but don’t give it too many permissions and you should be mostly fine. Using it in the browser is absolutely terrible, and you would not get push notifications.

    Amazed,

    A long time ago I used an app called Tinfoil Facebook that created a sandbox web browser style situation in the app. Gave it a nice UI and did not leave a trace. Switched to iPhone at some point. I wonder if it’s still around…

    dtc,

    Seems to still be available on F-Droid, but the last update was in 2017. I’ve installed it, but ended up not logging in since it’s targeting an SDK version so old that Android is giving me a bunch of warnings (and it doesn’t even scale to my entire screen, there’s a big black space at the bottom)

    Amazed,

    Wild! Thanks for checking up and following up.

    GnomeComedy, (edited ) in Privacy friendly Ubuntu antivirus ?

    You’d be better served learning how to setup and use:

    • backups (and test them)
    • automate your reinstall (see ansible)
    • firewalld (RHEL/Fedora) or ufw (Ubuntu)
    • fail2ban
    • SELinux (RHEL/Fedora) or AppArmor (Ubuntu)
    • disable SSH via password, use keys only
    • adblocker (like ublock origin) - credit to whale@lemm.ee for the idea below
    whale,
    @whale@lemm.ee avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • M4rkF,
    @M4rkF@fosstodon.org avatar

    @whale @GnomeComedy
    This also assumes they know how to tell if it is exposed or not.

    I normally setup fail2ban as soon as I know something exposed to the outside.

    GnomeComedy, (edited )

    No, most desktops behind a NAT probably dont need fail2ban (though it wouldn’t hurt).

    Everyone’s security profile/needs are different.

    The point is that list does a hell of a lot more useful than ClamAV

    whale,
    @whale@lemm.ee avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • GnomeComedy,

    Sounds like you’ve got a better solution, but I think you forgot to mention what it was.

    whale,
    @whale@lemm.ee avatar

    deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • GnomeComedy,

    If you think ClamAV on your mom’s laptop on Starbucks WiFi is doing anything useful, but you think fail2ban isn’t - you’re naive.

    On phishing - you’ve got another great example. ublock origin or any other decent adblocker will do WAAAAY more to help than ClamAV.

    neosheo,
    @neosheo@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

    For the automating of reinstalls what do you mean?

    Is it just a playbook that installs the distro, them installs the same packages, and then restores things like /home from backup?

    GnomeComedy,

    That, and:

    • put down config files that were modified
    • enable/start services that were installed
    • modify the firewall to open necessary ports

    Basically: put everything back as it was right before the ransomware encrypted your system on you.

    Then of course - fix what you did wrong that got you compromised. ;-)

    neosheo,
    @neosheo@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

    How would you determine the configs that were modified? What do you mean put down?

    GnomeComedy,

    Ideally you keep your configs in a git repo (like github). You know what’s modified because you’re the one who modified them. If you modify them - put that config file in the git repo.

    As for “put down” I just meant copied to the system (from github) by your automation (like ansible)

    docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/…/index.html

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • privacyguides@lemmy.one
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #

    Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25280152 bytes) in /var/www/kbin/kbin/vendor/symfony/http-kernel/Profiler/FileProfilerStorage.php on line 174

    Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 134217728 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 4210688 bytes) in /var/www/kbin/kbin/vendor/symfony/error-handler/Resources/views/logs.html.php on line 36