@Stamets@startrek.website
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Stamets

@Stamets@startrek.website

30s. Gay. Star Trek lover.


I post using Boost for Lemmy! Also on Mastodon!

Alt account of https://lemmy.world/u/Stamets.

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Spot! Haven’t seen you in a while, buddy!

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Data on Drugs? Or Data running Windows 98? You decide.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

That’s fair. And It was. A lot of Cyberpunk and random comedy to distract myself. Was needed. Thank you <3

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar
Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

I swear I had another version saved somewhere that said the same thing. I went looking for that one first but couldn’t find it. Goddammit I’m going to have to look again now.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

I just don’t own anything that has a radio built into it anymore. My phone does but needs wired headphones and while I have them I don’t use them anymore. That and I’m not going on the internet to suffer through a trillion shitty ads about some local car dealership.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

For me it’s a three way tie between First Contact, Those Old Scientists/Lower Decks crossover from SNW or Stormy Weather from Season 4 of Discovery. Honestly all his discovery episodes are stellar. You can really tell when he’s directing.

Stamets,
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

First off, no clue what your opening line is even attempting to say.

Second, no. It isn’t “just fact” lol

Listing examples instead of rambling opinions is far more convincing if you’re trying to get people to believe you. Especially when you claim that there are “many” issues, that they’re “objective” and that “writers have taken issue with.”

Moreover, if you want to share fact then separate the opinion from it. I am not taking you seriously both for the lack of example but also the fact that you are showing too much of your own opinion. The juvenile comment, the angry energy, saying “actual” writers to discredit people you disagree with further. Also the like “It’s just fact” is rarely spoken by people who are simply sharing objective fact.

Really hard to take someone at face value when they’re so angry and bitter.

Stamets, (edited )
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

It’s why I simply do not respect the opinions of people who say “I gave up on Discovery/SNW/Picard/LD in the first or second season.” I never have and I never will. That stance has an extreme double standard and I simply do not have a single ounce of respect for people who push it.

Those shows have around 10 episodes a season.

TNG, DS9, and VOY had about 20-24 per season.

They also ALL started with some really shitty opening seasons. Voyager didn’t get going until season 4ish, DS9 didn’t until late season 2/season 3. TNG took about two seasons to fully find its feet and have some of the most godawful TV of all Star Trek.

The same people whinin about New Trek will sit through all that garbage but won’t sit through 2 seasons of Discovery/Picard when it’s fewer episodes than a single season of OldTrek

If you say you don’t like the show then you don’t like the show. But anyone who says" I gave up after Season 1 or Season 2" I just immediately write off. I’ll still be respectful and kind and polite and care about them but opinions on what is and isn’t good Star Trek? Discarded on sight.

Stamets, (edited )
@Stamets@startrek.website avatar

Robert Meyer Burnett, Nitpicking Nerd, and Red Letter Media.

…This is not the take you thing it is lol

Red Letter Media

Ah yes. The self proclaimed racists who use ragebaiting as their primary method of getting people to watch their videos.

Nitpicking Nerd

Ah yes. The dude who openly uses his cynicism in his username and who constantly uses ragebaiting as well to get people to watch his videos.

Robert Meyer Burnett

Fucking who?

Like I said. Unless you are providing examples then I’m simply not taking you seriously. Your dismissal of it entirely and refusal to even attempt to defend your position means you simply don’t have a valid one.

I like the shows but that has nothing to do with this conversation. My liking of the show isn’t the reason why I’m expecting an unbiased/critical review. It’s simply because I have standards. Doesn’t matter if it is for Star Trek, Star Wars, or some show i’ve never even heard of. Anyone who’s going to inject their own emotional opinion into a review, and then refusal to even elaborate on position while doubling down, is someone whose opinion is just not worth the time to read to it.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #