sbv

@sbv@sh.itjust.works

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

sbv,

I get that services need to pay for staff/servers/production, so I’m fine with small monthly fees. I’d much rather pay than sit through ads.

Once a subscription creeps over six or seven bucks a month I’m gonna reevaluate it and start cutting.

It really annoys me that newspapers charge the same for digital and paper subscriptions.

sbv, (edited )

That’s counterintuitive, do you have a source for that?

EDIT: googling around, I don’t see any obvious answers.

sbv,

Are streaming services that different from cable TV? You’re paying for access to new content. If you want specific content to own, don’t they all let you buy them? I know I was able to buy GoT discs when I wasn’t willing to pay for an HBO subscription. Has that changed?

sbv,

It’s okay from time to time. I’ve been doing it too much recently.

sbv,

Getting buzzed and gaming. Not a great evening.

How do I stop a crush from developing further?

I think I got a crush on my dance instructor. Which fucking sucks for all the obvious reasons. Normally I wouldn’t be so worried. BUT I JUST HAD A GODDAMN ROMANTIC DREAM ABOUT HER. Seriously I just woke up from a dream about her confessing her love to me and me eagerly doing the same about her....

sbv,

I’m 90% sure your instructor is a compulsive nose picker.

sbv,

“Popular” would probably be more accurate.

Populist

populism as an ideology that presents “the people” as a morally good force and contrasts them against “the elite”, who are portrayed as corrupt and self-serving … Populists typically present “the elite” as comprising the political, economic, cultural, and media establishment, depicted as a homogeneous entity and accused of placing their own interests, and often the interests of other groups—such as large corporations, foreign countries, or immigrants—above the interests of “the people”.

sbv,

bring on the AI

sbv,

Not episodic. And not “the descendants of”.

If it was a heist movie, then the lead up could be in 1942 Paris - the thieves are anti-Nazi resistance and Allied spies, then, when it comes time for the theft to occur, it would switch to some third millennia setting on a space station. All the characters are the same. The Nazi general who has gathered gold from people sent to concentration camps is now the governor of the heavy helium mining operation (I dunno), played by the same actor, with a different accent, referring to the same events that happened previously. Then it’d switch to some other setting for the escape - but it would be the same characters with the same motivations/foibles/history.

sbv,

That’d be pretty cool. I like the idea of leaving notes to themselves.

sbv,

Hey, thanks for the link! That sounds great!

sbv,

More dark fantasy. Like Game of Thrones, but with a touch more magic.

sbv,

I really like the idea of changing settings midway through a show. A story would start in ancient China, then switch to the distant future (with the same characters, situation, and ongoing plot), then switch to WWII (same characters, etc), and so on.

I have no idea what kind of story would work with that kind of setting change, but I really like the idea.

And then I’d like to see the same kind of setting bouncing, but with the characters being aware of the switches, and trying to gain advantage through it. Kind of like Inception, but less terrible.

sbv,

This message brought to you by Big Analog Watch/Clock.

(/s unless you’re Swiss)

sbv,

It’s installed on a slight angle, so water pools in the soap holders and around the back of the faucet. If we don’t keep it dry, pools fill with gunge.

sbv,

Do the important shit first.

I guess this may be more of a project management thing, but trying to figure out what the most important part of a task is, and getting that done first.

If I’m cleaning the bathroom, I do the sink, because if I have to stop, that’s typically the grossest part.

When I’m doing my taxes, I do the stupid parts that I can’t afford to get wrong first.

When I’m packing for a trip, I get the stuff I need day-to-day sorted out and in my carry-on.

I don’t think these are great examples, but they mean something to me.

sbv,

How much of a reduction is “massive”?

Stress is undoubtedly a massive factor in mental illness, but there are others. Genetics plays a huge factor, as does trauma. I suspect lack of community is pretty huge too.

It just seems like society is knowingly creating hell on earth.

Yeah. I agree with this one. We’re too invested in the current order to seriously consider anything else.

sbv,

bonus points if it includes alliteration or it rhymes

sbv,

The absolute lack of people around was a definite upside of the pandemic.

sbv,

I’d lean towards the Software Development track, partly because that’s my background, and partially because it sounds like it would offer a better foundation in development fundamentals. I suspect AI is going to change significantly over the next couple of decades, so I suspect it would be less future proof.

Am I crazy for doing this later in life?

No. The best time to plant a tree is fifty years ago, the second best time is now.

When you get into development shops, you should discover that you’re promoted based on merit (if not, run). If that’s the case, use your maturity, and you’ll hopefully be able to progress quickly.

By using your maturity, I mean: have empathy for the user, focus on the most important parts of your project first, and speak up when you encounter problems. When I was a fresh dev, I focused on what was technically feasible, did the easy parts first, and tried to fight through problems on my own.

sbv,

are we talking consequences or Consequences?

How Google perfected the web (www.theverge.com)

We often hear about the latest engagement hacks on other platforms like Instagram, TikTok, or X, formerly known as Twitter. But Google is consequential above all of these, acting essentially as the referee of the web. Yet deep knowledge of how its systems work is largely limited to industry publications and marketing firms —...

sbv,

The article complains that websites twist themselves out of shape to game search ranking with SEO so they can sell ads. Google doesn’t provide transparency on exactly what changes SEO because they don’t want rankings gamed.

I dunno what to say. Ads are shitty for consumers. Websites that exist solely to sell ads risk turning into content farms (e.g. bOingbOing).

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #