lemmy.sdf.org

missphant, to memes in Totally listening

Just in awe at what a relic of a screenshot this is. Based on the UI this has to be 8 years old but there are no compression artifacts whatsoever.

Unforeseen,

A fine memeological specimen

fossphi, to memes in Totally listening

Off topic, but what the fuck is happening with some bot(?) posting 100s of the same shammy post in the community

Octopus1348,
@Octopus1348@lemy.lol avatar

It’s just a troll. Wants to make people angry, block him if you don’t like it.

lars,

That wasn’t me right? I know my instance was holding onto like a week’s worth of content then suddenly let it all go at once…

fossphi,

Nope,wasn’t you. Some other user. You can still see th3 gazillion posts they made if you scroll down sorting by new

li10, to memes in Totally listening

Meanwhile, I’m hoping “yeah, totally” is a response that makes sense, because fuck knows what they’re actually saying.

unreachable, to memes in Totally listening
@unreachable@lemmy.world avatar

the face of chatgpt reconsiders their own existence

Macaroni_ninja, to lemmyshitpost in Luck
@Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world avatar

I hope they will go smooth like a well oiled machine!

lars,

Alllot of people prefer water-based

Finals always preferred sandpaper-based for me

TheOneAndOnly, to lemmyshitpost in Luck

ITT: Lemmings who want you to know they understand the word, “kerning”.

Player2,

I’m just wondering why everyone is misspelling ‘keming’

lars,

Yes, I’m all about that keming and graphic design is my passion

Seraph, to lemmyshitpost in Luck
@Seraph@kbin.social avatar

Why didn't they use a capital F?

Sabre363, to lemmyshitpost in Luck

What a terribly awful font choice, the kerning of the anus is truly a travesty.

VikingHippie,

the kerning of the anus is truly a travesty.

Ain’t that always the case?

Aremel, to lemmyshitpost in Luck

They knew.

DharmaCurious,
@DharmaCurious@startrek.website avatar

Is there a double meaning here I’m not aware of? That does just straight up say anals, right?

theatomictruth,

Finals

glibg10b,

*fINALS

ptrknvk,

fi looks like an A.

usualsuspect191,

Had to. Why are all the letters capitalized except for the f? And the keming is so bad it has to be on purpose.

glibg10b,

rn
m

SVcross,
@SVcross@lemmy.world avatar

They had to.

kugmo, to linux in Is DNS Bloat too?
@kugmo@sh.itjust.works avatar

Embrace GNS.

mactan, to linux in Is DNS Bloat too?

I have no doubt in my mind that there’s some subset of the suckless crowd that thinks dns is bloat

Honytawk, (edited )

We should remove all those useless microservices! /s

Kuhelika, (edited )
@Kuhelika@lemmygrad.ml avatar

No you don’t understand bro. DNS is a useless service that serves no purpose other than increasing attack surface for hackers. Who needs dns when you can just type ip address?

RegalPotoo, to linux in Is DNS Bloat too?
@RegalPotoo@lemmy.world avatar

Tbh, if you can’t tap out Ethernet frames with a Morse key and decode the response by watching the blinking of an LED wired to the RX pair then you really don’t deserve to be on the internet. Git Gud.

mvirts, to linux in Is DNS Bloat too?

Lol … DNS is one of the pillars upon which the internets tands, a crumbling mess of a pillar but I’m sure glad we don’t have a name system built on hosts files 😹

smileyhead, to linux in Is DNS Bloat too?

Okey, I don’t get it. What’s wrong with DNS?

scroll_responsibly,
@scroll_responsibly@lemmy.sdf.org avatar
livethetruth,

Is the fact that that link couldn’t resolve your answer to that question haha?

FrederikNJS,

Uh… Please enlighten me on what DBUS has to do with DNS…

moon,

It’s d-bussin yoo

Inucune,

When it breaks, it isn’t always obvious or easy to fix, but can cause problems for anything that has to talk to anything else. The biggest thorn it puts in my side is that short names [ThisPC] are served differently than fqdn [ThisPC.MyDomain.com]. Does NotMyApp use short or FQDN to resolve other machines? I don’t find out until the Wireshark.

smileyhead,

Okey, I understand this is fundamental and when not working can cause the service to stop working. But I don’t yet know how does it break or is not easy to troubleshoot?

Haven’t hosted anything big yet, so I always just had to check the records via “dig” command if they are served correctly.

Chobbes,

DNS setups can get fairly complicated with enterprise VPNs and stuff, but the main thing is probably just that DNS is built entirely around caching, so when something does go wrong or you’re trying to update something it’s easy for there to be a stale value somewhere. It’s also really fundamental, so when it breaks it can break anything.

Overall, though, DNS isn’t terribly complex. It’s mostly just a key-value store with some caching. Running your own nameservers is pretty cool and will give you a much better understanding of how it all fits together and scales.

evranch,

Really annoying is when recent devices don’t respect the DNS you’re advertising or allow configuration (Android…)

My site is behind CGNAT on IPv4 with recently added fully routed IPv6. There are legacy control devices all over it that don’t speak IPv6, with local DNS records that allow them to be readily accessed while walking around with a mobile device… Allowed them to be accessed that is, until IPv6.

The Android IPv6 stack ignores the RA for my local DNS and also resolves via v6 by default, forwarding local queries upstream and returning no results. Then it doesn’t bother to fall back to v4. Unrooted Android has no exposed configuration for IPv6 of any sort to modify its behaviour, no hosts file to override or any way I can see to fix this. I can’t even disable IPv6 on my phone.

So to access my local devices from Android I need to use their full IPv4 address or VPN back into my own network… Oh wait, the stack is so broken that despite setting DNS in Wireguard, it still tries to resolve through upstream v6 first!

Apparently recent smart TVs are doing similar even on IPv4, hard-coded to 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8 to dodge ad blocking, which is plain malicious and ignores all standards…

So anyways this is why DNS is dragon #3

jbk, to linux in Is DNS Bloat too?

My prediction is that we’ll go DNSSEC globally when IPv6 gets mainstream adoption. It sucks how many just don’t care enough.

domi,
@domi@lemmy.secnd.me avatar

when IPv6 gets mainstream adoption

At the current speed that would approximately be in 2087.

lolcatnip,

Whoa there, let’s not get ahead of ourselves.

Chobbes,

The abysmal adoption of DNSSEC is just embarrassing, and I haven’t heard any good arguments for why we shouldn’t do it. There’s one blog post that gets passed around as justification for not adopting DNSSEC, but it doesn’t really go into any technical detail and is mostly just the author saying “I’m scared of governments and TLDs”… which is maybe fair, but you still have to trust them for regular CA certs and everything, so why not make thr base secure?

Honestly, I might care slightly more about DNSSEC than IPv6 adoption… IPv4 exhaustion and NATing everywhere sucks, but the fact that you can’t trust DNS is like… insane.

risencode,

when IPv6 gets mainstream adoption.

After my death then. Alright, carry on.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #