asklemmy

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

RememberTheApollo, (edited ) in Do you think Jon Stewart should run for president of the United States?

I’m not in favor of celebrity moving to politics. Even ones that I think are intelligent. Stewart has long been involved in political mockery and has actual experience in helping a bill get passed, but I think he wouldn’t survive the frustration of being forced to work in DC as President.

There’s a video out there that I can’t find where Stewart is talking to (political science students?) who ask him about his time in DC trying to get the 9/11 First Responders Bill passed and what he thought of politics there. His disgust for real politics and how politicians operate is vividly apparent and borders on revulsion.

I think he’s a good man, but I don’t know that he would be a successful president.

funkless_eck,

not particularly invested in this comment but isn’t the concept of “politician” essentially just “celebrity” nowadays anyway?

That someone has access to money and influence, can use those to set policy and maintain/secure both in-party and general-public votes. What’s the difference between politician and celebrity there? One could argue that experience in setting policy and/or studying law, but that doesn’t apply to a whole range of politicians anyway.

afraid_of_zombies,

Might be observation bias. You hear about the morons who can’t shut up.

RememberTheApollo,

I think the lines are blurred, sure. However there are plenty of politicians that really just kind of do their job and stay out of the limelight, whereas celebrities are by default in the public eye. Also, the biggest difference is the part where you vote for a politician and they set policy. I don’t vote for celebs, and I don’t call them telling me what to wear or watch “policy”. We’ve had 2 legit celebrity presidents and they’ve both been disastrous.

Ifera, (edited ) in What is a niche interest or hobby you'd personally like to see represented more on Lemmy

Men’s rights, but not like the piss pitt that the Reddit one has, but one that focuses on real men’s issues, like how rampant prison rape is in male prisons, parental alienation, forced military service and such.

And before anyone says that “It is men who mostly commit prison rape”, well duh, that is obvious, but prison should be a rehabilitation tool, not a punitive one, and especially not a for-profit business like it currently is.

And add the fact that prisoners should be under the care of the government, and the fact that so much abuse, sexual and otherwise is ignored and not prevented is nothing but appalling.

Psythik,

How about a “human rights” community that covers all genders.

Ifera,

That is a way better idea, as long as there is no bashing on fence issues such as circumcision and the pink tax(And I don’t mean pink tax in the sense of feminine razors being more expensive while being functionality the same as men’s razors, I mean the absurd markup on feminine hygiene products, and in some places tampons being taxed as luxury items).

iamericandre, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

Pot helps, for a little while at least

FollyDolly,
@FollyDolly@lemmy.world avatar

This was my answer. Blaze it 420 till the earth kicks us off.

RBWells, (edited ) in What is a niche interest or hobby you'd personally like to see represented more on Lemmy

My reddit subs I guess were all niche.

Curlyhair and Tampa (dead here, and were getting a little toxic on Reddit)

Cocktails (I mod !cocktails here, it’s growing slowly and organically, doing ok, nice place)

Normal Nudes and Naked Progress (not here and I can’t figure out how to set up a community on NSFW, and honestly modding anything NSFW is a slog I don’t know if I can handle, certainly not alone)

Meltrax, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

I started therapy a year ago.

I enjoy walking my dog (usually) and sitting with my cat.

I spend way, way more time exercising than is normal or mentally healthy probably, but it’s been my coping mechanism for years and I leaned into it.

I try to invite friends over when people have time. It’s not often. I’m that age where people are starting to get married and have kids and move away.

I’m miserable most of the time. I try to ignore the shitty politics, the news, the cost of housing, the cost of food, the quicksand it feels like we are all slowly sinking into.

I’ve decided I’m never having kids. They don’t deserve to be forced to exist in this.

The only consolation I’ve found is an answer to a similar post to this on Reddit a couple years ago - someone in their 60s or so was explaining that for what it’s worth, the world is always on fire if you only focus on that part. They grew up in the cold war, doing bomb shelter drills and hearing how they were going to get nuked by Russia. The economy has its issues then. The government has its issues then. I think those issues are worse now, but honestly who knows. You have to look for moments of brightness and try to avoid focusing on the morass of terribleness that everyone is trying to shove down your throat. It’s not easy. But the alternative is worse.

Psythik, (edited ) in What is a niche interest or hobby you'd personally like to see represented more on Lemmy

Individual communities for every car in existence like reddit has. And an active bitcoin community that isn’t just a bot mirroring posts from reddit.

Edit: and a community for DJs.

iarigby, (edited ) in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

I’m trying to enjoy things while they last and appreciate how precious they are, especially nature. Sometimes I wonder whether I should be preparing for the brutal future that is to come, since there is no avoiding famine, draughts, mass migrations and wars that the climate change will cause. But we don’t have enough information about what exactly will happen, and since humans have an unbelievable ability to adapt, it can be left for the future. so the only thing I can do now is create memories and spend time with loved ones so I’m not full of regrets once we lose everything

JimmyBigSausage, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

Quit reading the news and enjoy hobbies.

Viking_Hippie, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

I love it when the next post on my feed fits perfectly https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/10ee6c7f-ba4a-438e-8bca-e338b66e3cce.jpeg

bizzle, in What sub Lemmy's should we all check out?
@bizzle@lemmy.world avatar
Sterile_Technique, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?
@Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world avatar
smeg, in What sub Lemmy's should we all check out?

If you’re OK with another self-plug then !freegames is a community I set up for posting limited-time giveaways of full video games. I now have more games than I have time to play.

AlmightySnoo,
@AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world avatar

that’s actually a great community, subbed!

smeg,

Cheers pal!

schmorpel, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

Going solarpunk

LadyLikesSpiders, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

How do I cope? Poorly

retrieval4558,

Exactly what I was about to post

PatMustard, in How do you cope with the state of the world today?

On average the world is better than it’s ever been. Higher life expectancies, less war, better quality of life; it’s all generally on the up. Would you rather go back to the last financial crisis? When the ozone layer was being depleted? The interment threat of nuclear annihilation? Race riots? Women not being able to vote? High infant mortality? etc, etc

greywolf0x1,

Less war?

There’s a genocide going on in the middle east right now by settler colonialist fully backed by the western powers to destabilize the region and I’m sure you know that, it’s just irrelevant to you.

There’re too many neoliberals on lemmy, I can’t even deal fam

Pohl,

There were at least 2 other genocides in progress the last October when this mess started. You only care about this one because you have been told to.

Neoliberalism is really an economic philosophy. It doesn’t really have a lot to say about how a nation ought to position itself toward foreign wars. It’s not an all purpose slur for people who disagree with you.

intensely_human,

Which ones are those? What?

Pohl,

The darfuri people in Sudan and the uyghur people in china were what I had in mind. But honestly, war that disproportionately impacts one ethnic group or another is a fairly common sort of war.

otp,

On average the world is better than it’s ever been

Of course, certain groups of people have been trying to reverse these trends in the name of…money? Tradition?

The newer generations are no longer becoming smarter (I believe it was the Flynn effect). Education is being defunded at all levels.

The cost of living in many parts of the world has been outpacing wages… especially now, but for decades. Yet we have more wealth hoarded into fewer hands.

Anti-vax and anti-science movements have been reintroducing measles and have been making it hard to fight other diseases.

We are seeing the effects of these things in action, and they will only get worse over time.

intensely_human,

They’re trying to reverse those trends because acknowledging those trends means giving up on their theory that our dominant economic system is defunct.

highduc,

It’s cancer and it’s killing us all.

intensely_human,

Exactly. That kind of thinking doesn’t work when you realize the “cancer” is producing situations like:

Higher life expectancies, less war, better quality of life

Do you disagree with those statements? Do you need to see evidence before you’ll believe them?

Or do you acknowledge the statements, but disagree that they justify the “cancer” of our current economic system?

highduc,

Do you disagree with those statements? Do you need to see evidence before you’ll believe them?\

I disagree with them.
Higher life expectancy - I wouldn’t attribute that to capitalism. Further more life expectancy in the US is declining afaik.
Less war - What do you mean? There’s a war in Ukraine, one in Palestine, and there’s been perpetual war since …forever. The US war machine always bombs some country, assassinates a democratically elected leader, etc.
Better quality of life - For the 1% at the expense of all the others maybe.

Capitalism is all about profits, not about better products, better quality of life, etc. In fact it’s easily against those things if they get in the way of profit. You can see enshittification everywhere.
For example it would be against their interest for a pharmaceutical company to sell the permanent cure for a disease instead of life-long medical treatment. The latter would be subscription-based therefore create more profit. The cancer comparison is quite fitting imo.

HenriVolney,

Some people argue that humanity was never freer, happier and healthier than before the agricultural revolution. Everything has gone to shit since we decided to settle down on a small plot of land.

PatMustard,

It was much simpler when you were born, miraculously survived childhood, hunted, gathered, then died before your back even had time to get sore

intensely_human,

Honestly it probably was a far more meaningful and fun life. Terrifying too, but super meaningful. The environment your brain evolved for. No old age horseshit, just a painful moment of death followed by your family mourning you. But no pictures or nothing, and everyone’s tripping on shrooms so you’re still there in spirit form. I’m joking as a reflex but I’m serious here. It was probably a better life overall. Seeing a worm and thinking of it as food, having no problem eating that little bastard because your stomach’s gnawing at ya. That’s life boy. Just raw dogging for all the jungle to see why the hell not. It’s prehistory baby. Anything goes.

intensely_human,

Sorry I am trying to make a point. I think it would be better probably. Except for all the misery. The good parts would be super good. The non-awful parts would be super good.

PatMustard,

Sounds like it would be cool for some kind of quantum-leap holiday, but I think in general I’d rather have the relative comfort and lack of preventable pain that modern technology provides!

intensely_human,

How’s the argument go?

HenriVolney,

For about 60k years, between the cognitive revolution and the agricultural revolution, Sapiens was the apex predator of every ecosystem he lived in. People would move from pace to place, foraging and hunting a vast variety of plants and animals. They had the most diverse diet, didn’t rely on a small number of food products that would have exposed them to famine in case of collapse (like crops). Women had few children because they had to carry the younger ones and child mortality was not a challenge to the group survival: there were fewer diseases because they lived in small groups. People lived in tight communities and didn’t have to cope with the mental strains associated with long-term planning. Of course you could get killed by another tribe, eaten by a tiger or die from an infection. But your teeth and gums were healthy, you had the best diet, great overall physical health and people actually lived into their 60s.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #