yarr,

I want to know why Texas is putting their children in the river in the first place.

cashews_best_nut,

They’re Mexican children that are drowning so it’s ok.

yarr,

Texas is kidnapping Mexican children and drowning them in the river?

cashews_best_nut,

I heard from others that it’s an invasion. So massed regiments of Mexican children invading the border. That’s why the National Guard are involved. To beat back the masses of child soldiers.

WanderingVentra,

Hm… I should get a gun. And a passport.

TheInsane42,
@TheInsane42@lemmy.world avatar

Skip the gun. No civilized country will let you have it.

UrPartnerInCrime,
@UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works avatar

Need something for on the way to the airport

bouh,

A car is probably better to go to the airport.

psycho_driver,

A car with guns fastened to it.

naught,

yes but they can shoot behind them the whole time offering small but important time savings from the boost it provides

mnemonicmonkeys,

Finland, Sweden, Germany, Belgium, etc.

The only thing is that they won’t allow you to import guns you already have. You have to buy new ones there

Darkard,

It’s not a new civil war reason. It’s the same one as last time just packaged up a little different.

Racism

Eldritch,

It’s not even a new civil war. The last civil war only ended technically. In reality it went cold and has still been being waged all this time. It turned from a war of the rural South against the industrialised north. To a war on the industrialized from the rural.

JDubbleu,

I, for one, welcome the formation of the New California Republic. Washington and northern Oregon can join too if they’d like.

kandoh,

The Governors are unserious idiots playing with fire hoping they won’t get burned by a rando of their idiot base taking it too far.

The real risk for Americans remains a situation like The Troubles, not armed conflict between states and the federal government.

APassenger,

More people need to track to your point about The Troubles. It’s where I’d think things progress.

OpenStars,
@OpenStars@startrek.website avatar

I read how most experts agree that there will be some kind of “constitutional crisis” within the next decade. The impeachment 1, impeachment 2, and January 6 attacks already show the rumblings of what is to come.

Personally I find it doubtful that a full civil war would be the means though bc of the disparity b/t military resources at the federal vs. lower levels. Thus, probably something else, perhaps extremely mundane e.g. Trump runs for President, and bc of the Israeli conflict in Gaza and whatever else Russia manufactures between now and then Biden loses, then Trump simply declares himself Emperor.

Or maybe even that much paperwork will not happen and the government will simply never pass another federal budget again, thus ending the federal level by default of obstruction.

So probably not Civil War, at this time and over this event (no matter how much the clickbait media tries to get its clicks), but even so… something is coming indeed, down the road in some form.

slumlordthanatos,

Honestly, it’ll probably wind up becoming an American version of The Troubles. Republicans are cowards, and I doubt there are very many who are truly willing to fight and die for their cause. However, there are plenty of people willing to commit terrorist bombings and acts of sabotage if they think they can get away with it, and the US is huge. There are still plenty of places to hide if that’s the case.

And if Trump wins reelection, I can’t imagine many blue states putting up with it, and the same thing will happen from the opposite direction.

OpenStars,
@OpenStars@startrek.website avatar

I don’t know how liberals will react tbh. Usually they try to work within the system, but if that should ever prove to become impossible… I haven’t studied enough history to get any kind of accurate impression, but it’s worth noting that nothing like it has been needed (within the USA) in the last hundred years or so, so whatever might come seems hard to predict.

I should add that Democrats are also cowards too, as are most individuals - neither side holds a monopoly on that. That’s what makes this all so dangerous: if something could be accomplished behind the scenes, then 99.9999% of Americans will simply go along with the flow. Exactly like within Russia, even the thinnest vernier of respectability would be enough to forestall a large-scale conflict. So the “constitutional crisis” might take the form of a fairly bloodless (in the wider sense) coup.

Or Republicans could just keep turning the ratchet, making steady gains wherever they can, then locking in those gains and turtling, obstructing as best they can whenever they do not hold a majority, as they have been doing for decades now. In one sense that’s even entirely fair - a democracy should reflect the majority will of the people - except Republicans are aware that white people are becoming in the minority now and so have been changing more and more over time who gets to be counted as “people”. e.g. gerrymandering, with the stacked Supreme Court members not opposing it so now it’s “legal”. Though even that is becoming not enough lately thus they are having to adjust the stakes higher, possibly doing away with voting altogether (yes they are literally talking about that, hence all this discussion about Civil War). They have already been allowed to push that far, which leaves fewer options for them to move forward with short of something drastic.

The trick is that to the uninitiated, much of it sounds reasonable at first - e.g. “states rights” means that we all get to choose our own paths, and what is wrong with that, isn’t that “freedom” in the truest sense of the word? The trouble is how the lie is delivered along with the truth: for one, the means by which those gains were achieved has enormous implications, which feeds into two, it was actually always a lie bc they never stop there and always push forward after people accept the first push. i.e., if only appeasement would ever actually work! However, like that famous saying “first they came for…”, where even if you don’t care about those first few that were come for, eventually they will come for YOU too, and if you had been paying attention then there would be no need to be shocked, shocked I tell you, shocked! Leopards eat faces off, and just bc one hasn’t eaten YOUR face off, yet, doesn’t mean that it never will. They tend not to change their spots, only their current targets. Like Brexit, many people in the USA won’t know what’s happening anytime before, during, or somehow even after it has happened.:-(

And some are even joining in with the leopards, neither realizing nor seemingly caring that they are just being saved as future meals for those who are true predators. These “facilitators”, together along with the much more numerous “collaborators”, collectively are bringing literal (neo-)Nazis back into power.

kandoh,

If it does go down, it’ll be rural people driving into cities to shoot them up, plant bombs, or drive people over with their trucks. That’s what it’ll look like.

OpenStars,
@OpenStars@startrek.website avatar

“Will”? Check the news… it’s been happening for awhile, just not terribly successfully. I think we get something like at least one such event every other month.

LovingHippieCat,

Highly unlikely this is what the civil war would be like. It’s not a state v state thing necessarily although that might be a small part of it. In the first civil war, the south unified and its people largely supported the war, except their slaves. It’s unlikely something like that will happen again. It’s not impossible but unlikely.

What is much more likely is rural v city. Even in red states, cities are blue and will often vote for blue policies. Rural areas are where things get dicey. They’ve been largely left behind by the surge in industry and general expansion of the capitalist economy we currently have (they’ve had a lot of businesses (including grocery stores) close because more people are leaving, and their rural towns are frequently having their hospitals close leaving large swaths of areas where the nearest hospital is an hour away). As such, they’ve got a grudge against the cities. What’s likely to happen is rural counties and their local governments trying to cut off their food supply, starving the cities to win the battle. There’s tons more possibilities, but this one I think is the one that’s got the highest likelihood.

Another possibility that is scary, but is highly dependent on the party of the people in power, is the government using their power to actually strike the cities, like in Syria where Assad bombed and used chemical weapons on his own people. Syria is actually a pretty good example of what more modern civil wars are like, or can be like. Governments v rebels and militias, and cities v rural (although there’s much less rural land in Syria).

If you’re interested, the podcast It Could Happen Here has a great first season where they go over possible disasters including a civil war and a pandemic (it was actually made in 2019 so before covid). It’s really helpful and can teach a lot, especially for an outsider from across the pond. It also does a lot better job giving an explanation and actual sources.

Hope this helps since it didn’t seem like you were getting a real answer.

NeoNachtwaechter,

What is much more likely is rural v city.

Isn’t it even more likely trump disciples vs reasonable people?

Zoboomafoo,

I also recommend It Could Happen Here

drcobaltjedi,

I had to stop listening to ICHH it gave me way too much anxiety and was just too stressed back when i listened in 2020. I’ve since taken up to instead listen to BTB and cool people who did cool stuff off the same network. Monsters that are usually dead and people who kick ass make me feel better.

prettybunnys,

Another thing the world ought to know is that the folks who are identified by “red” and “right” in America are in the minority.

Significantly so.

However our voting system uses geography / land as a modifier so while there are less of them they occupy a larger land mass and have an outsized vote strength because of that.

When total votes in a state can be split 45-55 but the delegates go 90-10 there is a problem

skulblaka,

Another fun thing about that is that most folks who identify “red” or “right” actually aren’t paying enough attention to know that. Go ask them, they think people like them make up 70% or more of the country. If they do try to activate their little civil war they are going to find themselves very quickly surrounded by folks who do not like them at all, as their expected 200-million strong army ends up actually only being 1.5 million people spread out over 30,000+ square miles. Watching the realization dawn on them might actually even be fun if it weren’t a herald of Troubles for America.

deweydecibel, (edited )

The geographical separation of slave states by an actual border allowed the first Civil War to take place on a stage perfectly suited for traditional warfare. North/South division and the formal joining of the Confederacy by state governments kept it all straightforward. Point South and tell the generals “Go.”

It definitely won’t be that simple again.

joel1974,

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • Lemminary,

    Why?

    LinkOpensChest_wav,

    He probably lives in an area where he wouldn’t be impacted too much and/or from a demographic that wouldn’t be directly persecuted.

    I’m terrified by the thought, on behalf of myself and others.

    DarkNightoftheSoul, (edited )

    Seems to be a distinct possibility. Posturing prior to the election, rattling sabers, they’re spoiling for a full-on shootin’ war contingent on losing the election, in my opinion.

    edit: I dare say, it might even be strategically advantageous for them to intentionally try lose, claim it was rigged, and use that to go live with the 4th riech.

    LeadEyes,

    I think the tactical nukes will slow their ambitions for another hundred or so years. We can’t take these posturing fools seriously.

    deweydecibel,

    We can’t take these posturing fools seriously

    Have you just not been paying attention for the last…decade?

    Yes, we absolutely should.

    Mirshe,

    And yet, we must. Assume your enemy will lose, but prepare for them to win.

    Corkyskog,
    @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works avatar

    No one is using a tactical nuke on US soil. We have enough conventional bombs to destroy ourselves anyway.

    Aussiemandeus,
    @Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone avatar

    Certainly would be exciting as an Australian

    cashews_best_nut,

    I found your wife! --> 🦘

    simple,

    It would be rad for me too. I don’t wish harm to Americans of course, but I think it’s about time they start throwing hands instead of whining on the internet 24/7 about how much they hate eachother.

    Kecessa, (edited )

    Seen from the outside and ignoring all the innocent people suffering, I would love one thing about the USA splitting up, it would be the perfect example of how shitty things can get when people don’t realize they live in conservative locations that depend on the goodwill of more progressive locations. Split the USA like on OP’s map and just watch as the red part devolves into a third world country.

    hal_5700X,
    @hal_5700X@lemmy.world avatar

    No, Tim Pool.

    cashews_best_nut,

    I dunno who that is, sorry. :/

    Lemminary, (edited )

    Good, Dim Tool isn’t worth the attention.

    callouscomic,

    A lotta people’s shitty 2nd amendment logic is about to be tested.

    badbytes,

    Nah, just giving Texas back to Mexico.

    PeckerBrown,

    Fuck Trump and his shit-headed followers forever.

    Blackmist,

    Could they not at least bunch up a bit so it’s easier to build a wall around them?

    cikano,

    Civil war 2: Electric Boogaloo, also: Blammo?

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • asklemmy@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #