MaoZedongers,

That’s fucking horrifying.

How many stickers to get his soul back?

ricecake,

I’m glad everyone finds it weird and gross, but I’m also amused at how many people don’t know this is a five year old joke from a mommy blogger at this point.

Never actually real, just meant to make people who were currently dealing with sticker boards and feeling weird about it chuckle.

JDubbleu,

It honestly blows my mind how many people on Lemmy are completely incapable of interpreting sarcasm. I know Poe’s Law and all that, but this is pretty clearly a joke.

bstix,

The comments are really weird. Not just about the chart training and prostitutional aspect, but also that people who argue about it still seem to have a shared opinion that stererotypical men won’t do these tasks.

So, even if they acknowledge that the meme is crazy in one way or the other, they’re still reinforcing the negative stereotype of the bumbling sitcom dad and that these tasks are not manly or something.

This joke is quite toxic even when understood as a joke.

TimewornTraveler,

if you think people like this don’t really exist then… lucky you!

kromem, (edited )

As has been pointed out before, Lemmy is mostly people who up and left Reddit.

There’s a variety of different archetypes that did that.

And it explains a lot of the more head scratching experiences I’ve had here.

The_Lopen,

I’m appalled that you actually expect me to do research on memes and not accept them at face value. Leave my propaganda addled mind in peace dammit.

HowManyNimons,

Ten. It’s a ten year old joke.

ricecake,

Oh, you’re right. Also: oh God, you’re right. :(

imPastaSyndrome,

Why’d they Photoshop her eye upside-down into his left eye?

Ethalis,

That is the face of a man 1 BJ away from passing out

LinkOpensChest_wav,

This isn’t real. This can’t be real.

Can it?

Vespair,

It’s “real” in that it’s not photoshopped, but it was never really used and was always just a dumb joke for social media:

babygaga.com/truth-about-daddys-sticker-chart-rev…

y’all taking literal boomer humor at face value. That’s embarrassing

LinkOpensChest_wav,

y’all taking literal boomer humor at face value. That’s embarrassing

I literally asked if it was real lol.

Thanks for answering.

Vespair,

Sorry, the “y’all” was directed at the rest who weren’t questioning this bait; I didn’t mean to imply it was towards you

LinkOpensChest_wav,

Oh gotcha. I’m so used to the singular use of “y’all” because of my social circle haha

Vespair,

All good, it was an understandable way to read my comment and entirely my fault for being unclear. But I think we’re good. Cheers ✌

LinkOpensChest_wav,

Yep, no problem. Have a good one!

TropicalDingdong,

Love and affection are commodities to be turned into a transaction.

DrSleepless,

This guy capitalisms

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

To some people, they are.

gravitas_deficiency,

no nagging for a week

Wow, there’s just so much to unpack from just that sentence, let alone the chart.

WeeSheep,

Unfortunately, women tend to want partners, men want caregivers. Reminding him to care for his kids because he doesn’t recognize how children as his responsibility is now a women’s personality issue, rather than a man’s personality issue. It’s wild that a woman doing merely most of the care work and the full entirety of family organization from cleaning to meals has become something to look down on as a woman failing rather than men being irresponsible and not respecting their spouse.

0x4E4F, (edited )
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

I’m really surprised this got downvoted… don’t get me wrong, I downvoted as well, but… this is not what I expected.

activ8r,

Wow. What an incredibly sexist comment.

RaoulDook,

You may be right in general, but none of that is a good excuse for a transactional sex life.

If I wanted to exchange services (labor) for sex, I could simply take the money earned from labor to purchase it from a prostitute. That is not what a marriage should be like.

stevehobbes,

I don’t think the kids pay you to clean up their puke or blowouts.

Assman,
@Assman@sh.itjust.works avatar

women tend to

I’m gonna stop you right there dawg

Drewelite,

Men tend to trend more irresponsible, women more neurotic, in my experience. There’s plenty of exceptions, but on the whole that’s what I’ve seen. Neither is good, both can collapse a relationship. In straight relationships this can result in women taking on everything. Even where she’s overcome (or not originally had) any neuroticism, a sufficiently irresponsible man can still put the problem on her shoulders.
What I think you’re omitting is that this can happen in reverse.

Even when a man overcomes (or didn’t originally have) any irresponsibility, a sufficiently neurotic woman can still put all the problems on him. He has to pull the tasks away from her because she thinks only she can do it ‘right’. Only then can he pull his weight. But he then must also do the dance of convincing his partner that he’s doing a good job, or she’ll just feel compelled to do the work again herself.

Of course most relationships are somewhere between these extremes. And some even see the roles reversed. People are, of course, extremely diverse. But this is a common pattern I’ve seen.

WeeSheep,

Well put!

Katrisia, (edited )

Unfortunately, women tend to want partners, men want caregivers.

Thank you. Nobody’s seeing that. All the comments saying the woman is mean, instead of talking about how irresponsible the man must be that he needs a reward system to do what he should be doing on his own* for his family.

*I’m not sure if it’s the right expression. I mean by his own volition and out of responsibility.

Edit: I won’t acknowledge the rest of your comment because, honestly, it got confusing.

gravitas_deficiency,

You are making a lot of sweeping generalizations that are wildly inaccurate. Some of those statements (hell, maybe all of them) may be true for certain socio-political subgroups of our society, but I absolutely do not agree that that’s the dynamic through which most heterosexual people view their partners (or more accurately, the idea of a partner).

You’re basically just regurgitating the “atomic family” ethos from back in the 1950s.

taanegl,

Look at his eyes, and look at his face… this is the trained male.

Long have nation states and governments tried to break the male, to wrangle the male into a submissive state, but none are more successful than the woman sociopath.

The female sociopath is in many ways addicted to control. Her one impulse to anything the male does is how she can turn it into her advantage, to control the male entirely.

Luckily for the male, the sociopath woman gives fierce blowjobs, so it’s up to him wether or not the pain and degradation is worth it. 4/10 males say it is.

Look at his eyes. He’s truly worked for this.

Fribbtastic,

Why did I read that with the David Attenborough voice in mind?

bobs_monkey,

Luckily for the male, the sociopath woman gives fierce blowjobs

Honestly that’s a 50/50 shot between fierce and dead fish. I have proclivity for crazy, and a good half the time it’s all for show and a real disappointment at game time. That all said, always test drive the car before signing the paperwork.

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

Listen to this guy, he knows what he’s talking about

ininewcrow,
@ininewcrow@lemmy.ca avatar

Also … if you have too many questions for the transaction from the start … it probably isn’t a worthwhile transaction.

0x4E4F, (edited )
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

On the contrary, given my current life experience, I damn well diserve answers to all the questions I may have… if there are none or not enough, yes, the transaction is not worthwile.

Kecessa,

Look guys, I’ve spotted the incel!

taanegl, (edited )

Voluntary. I’m ace. But I’m also an aspiring Gonzo writer. Check my other comments.

iheartneopets,

Wtaf did I just read, and why god does it have so many up votes. Please let this be a copy pasta.

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

It’s a sarcastic view on what the meme depicts. We are in shitposts after all.

Kecessa,

“sarcastic”

Yeah I wouldn’t get my hopes up

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

That’s the fun part about sarcasm, you never know how much of what that person said or wrote he really identifies with.

TseseJuer,

it’s hilarious nonetheless

Psythik,

Because it’s entertaining.

Dasnap,
@Dasnap@lemmy.world avatar

Lad should just whack it to succubus porn like the rest of us.

Bassman27,

This guy is 100% poisoning his kids so they can throw up

EnderMB,

If it’s a baby, then my man is going to be getting it non-stop.

bartlebee,

The pro move is to self-induce vomiting on your own dick so she has to help you clean it up.

kromem,

Munchausen’s by blowjob

BoxerDevil,

Is it just me, or does he have a black eye

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

It’s shopped.

ryathal,

He realized after putting the seat down three times the nagging wasn’t going to stop anyway.

db2,

The creepiest thing about that is how she wants her husband to be her child and still put his penis in her mouth. Fucked. Up.

iheartneopets,

I would say the creepiest part is that this man needs a childish chart like this just to take care of his children. She’s not his mom and honestly they should talk separation instead of having to come up with incentive charts just to get him to be a father.

db2,

Where in there do you see there being a need?

0x4E4F,
@0x4E4F@sh.itjust.works avatar

Sometimes, the latter is easier for the children’s sake. I can confirm from experience.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #