linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

barbecue_sprinkler, in Steam Linux Marketshare Surges To Nearly 2% In November

My guess is that most gaming Linux users have a dual boot setup and play games on Windows.

woelkchen,
@woelkchen@lemmy.world avatar

My guess is that most Linux gamers tracked by Steam have a dual hardware setup with a Steam Deck and a Windows desktop PC/notebook.

VerseAndVermin,

Doesn’t it show +0.05% Arch? I was under the impression SteamOS was tracked as Arch. So if 0.15% is a blend of Arch and SteamOS-Arch, it seems to be growing in quite a few ways.

woelkchen,
@woelkchen@lemmy.world avatar

I was under the impression SteamOS was tracked as Arch.

No, that’s not the case. A separate listing for SteamOS leads by a lot. If you install pure Arch (or another distro) on Steam Deck or for whatever reason install and launch the Flatpak version of Steam, those won’t get counted as SteamOS but otherwise it’s pretty clear how big the installed base of SteamOS is.

VerseAndVermin,

Ohh, okay. Thanks for explaining it to me. I misunderstood.

AnUnusualRelic,
@AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world avatar

I used to keep a windows drive to run steam. But it honestly sees very little use nowadays.

Mostly I boot it every few months to see what shenanigans Microsoft has pulled with windows. Other than that, it’s just sitting there. Everything I play runs in Linux.

I run Tumbleweed btw.

dinckelman,

If not for games like Destiny, I wouldn’t even need that. Literally everything else I play runs great on Linux now

Quereller,

Not anymore. I don’t even bother to check steamdb, games run anyhow flawlessly under Proton experimental.

(OK, maybe check if the game runs well before buying it)

barbecue_sprinkler,

Wel yeah, single player games almost almost work flawlessly. However games with kernel level anticheat are generally not playable on Linux.

Potatofish, in why doesn't GNOME have a mascot??

Because they were smart.

just_another_person, (edited ) in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?

I’m assuming you don’t want a full disk encryption solution, but you can also use LUKS to just create an encrypted mount of any supported filesystem. You don’t need any type of standalone program to encrypt your things for you.

wontbowyoung,
@wontbowyoung@lemmy.world avatar

Makes sense

bizdelnick, in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?

EncFS, CryptoFS, eCryptFS…

phrogpilot73, in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?
@phrogpilot73@lemmy.world avatar

I use Cryptomator. Does exactly what you describe.

TCB13,
@TCB13@lemmy.world avatar

Just be aware you can lose your data. It is really bad with long file names and folders with a large number of files, there are multiple reports online about people losing their data. I personally have experienced this with large file names and once an entire vault that suddenly couldn’t be open.

Evotech,

I’m pretty sure most of the reports online is rooted back to user error.

AbidanYre,

That doesn’t help the people who lost data.

And the reports are common enough that it suggests cryptomator should consider making some interface changes.

Evotech,

I’m just saying it’s not going to randomly brick your data. Just be cautious when performing tasks.

AbidanYre,

That’s fair. But I’d still be really wary of something with a reputation for eating data just because a user looked at it funny.

theit8514, in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?

I have used gocryptfs (github.com/rfjakob/gocryptfs) in the past, it creates an overlay mount that encrypts each dir and file separately, so no need to precreate a container. There are some security downsides to this approach though so be aware of that. nuetzlich.net/gocryptfs/threat_model/

cypherpunks, in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?
@cypherpunks@lemmy.ml avatar

You have a few options.

My preferred way is to create an encrypted disk image using LUKS, backed by a sparse file. Sparse means that, while you’ll still need to specify a size for the encrypted volume, it won’t actually use the space on the underlying disk until you use the space on the encrypted volume. You could even make the encrypted volume bigger than your physical disk (though of course you’d get an error if you tried to actually use that extra space).

There are a few ways to setup a LUKS container; if you want to learn how to do it manually, this howto i just found looks like a good overview of the steps (though I wouldn’t recommend doing its final Setup auto mount section).

These days, you can also create a LUKS volume on a sparse file entirely using a GUI such as the GNOME Disks program. Using it, just click the hamburger menu and select “New Disk Image” and then with your new disk image selected click the gears menu and “Format Partition” and there should be a checkbox for LUKS on that screen. If you leave “Erase” turned off (which is the default), then the backing file will be sparse.

One downside to the sparse disk image approach is that when you delete files from the encrypted volume you will not regain that space on the outer disk automatically. It is possible to, but requires work to do so which I won’t try to document here.

Another approach which doesn’t have that downside is to use eCryptfs instead of LUKS. It stores each encrypted file separately (with an encrypted name) and thus doesn’t hide the directory structure or file sizes - only directory and file names and file contents are encrypted. It also appears to have not been updated since 2016, but, it is still included in various distributions so it is also an option. You can read about how to use it (and other caveats about it) on the arch wiki.

0xtero, in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?
cypherpunks,
@cypherpunks@lemmy.ml avatar

that creates encrypted archives, but doesn’t provide a mountable filesystem (which is what OP means by “real-time”).

0xtero,

Ah ok, well LUKS in that case I guess

penquin, in This week in KDE: changing the wallpaper from within System Settings

I am trying to install kde neon in a VM to try plasma 6 and actually test and report bugs, too, and the installer launches into a completely transparent window and I can’t proceed from there. Tried to install opensuse krypton, it was taking so long to install I actually gave up and quit the install.

Pantherina,

In my experience too KDE Neon unstable is a total mess.

Maybe try the new Fedora Rawhide with KDE? There even is an immutable image now. I will try that on Baremetal in a few minutes, as in the VM scaling and all was a mess, but VMs also just dont cover regular use scenarios (dual monitors, energy saving, fingerprint sensor (I want to keep mine for the host lol), memory, actually working GPU (thanks AMD mobile bullshit CPUs)

penquin,

I honestly do have an extra laptop to test on. So I might just slap fedora kde on it or something.

Pantherina,

I just rebased from latest Kinoite to Plasma 6 and so far neat, polished, no bugs? Damn KDE Nightly was a total mess?


<span style="color:#323232;">rpm-ostree rebase --reboot fedora:fedora/rawhide/x86_64/kinoite
</span>

Great so far! Not beta anymore at all.

penquin,

Sounds good. Thank you for that.

ani, in Best distro for Lenovo Carbon X1

I have been having the same issue with a Lenovo laptop but on NixOS. I suppose this is a kernel issue; I’ll try updating and see if it solves the issue.

uis, in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?
@uis@lemmy.world avatar

Ext4 encryption

hperrin, in What's your experience with bluetooth audio?

I haven’t had any issue with Bluetooth audio on Fedora.

HarriPotero, in Is there a tool to real-time encrypt folders?
@HarriPotero@lemmy.world avatar

Sounds like you’re looking for EncFS.

It’ll leak the size and structure of whatever you have there. Filenames and content are encrypted.

velox_vulnus, in Made the switch to KDE

I don’t like GNOME for it’s poor theming support and it’s toxic dev community (ahem, talking about senior devs, especially Ebassi’s hostility towards newbies), but I think that it has some well-designed defaults. I love the workflow - everything is fast and snappy, shortcuts are pretty nice, aligning window is quick, and if there’s a lack of space, I can just drop the app in another workspace. Yes, I am using GNOME 45 at the movement, and I think it’s quite nice. But I also love the roadmap of GNUStep, and maybe if I can in the future, I would love to assist Gregory Casamento.

LainOfTheWired, in What's your experience with bluetooth audio?
@LainOfTheWired@lemy.lol avatar

For me on Arch and also, but a lot less frequent fedora I find that it works fine then every few months there’s an update that breaks it for a few days till it gets patched. But besides that it works fine for me. I use blueman in DWM BTW

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #