linux

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

ultra, in Lightweight distro for home server?

Debian is perfect for this.

MangoKangaroo, in Lightweight distro for home server?

Since nobody has said it yet: Ubuntu server or Debian. /s

In seriousness, I use both. They’re pretty great. Note that if you use Ubuntu server you can get Ubuntu Pro free for up to three devices. This comes with ten years (!) of security patches. Great if you aren’t keen on upgrading anytime soon.

BastingChemina, in Lightweight distro for home server?

Did someone suggested Debian already? If not I would suggest Debian.

possiblylinux127,

Has anyone heard of debian?

kraniax, in Any advice on running a pubnix/tilde?

XMPP is a must. I automatically discard tildes that host matrix but not XMPP.

Evil_Shrubbery, in Lightweight distro for home server?

Debian or Ubuntu Server (or something specific to servers purpose, like OMV, etc).

… but ProxMox (a hypervisor, Debian based) doesn’t have much overhead & runs on old PCs pretty well. And with that, you can pretty much try any distro (as a full virtual machines, perhaps with dockers within it, or as a lightweight containers that are really resource efficient). Or separate containers for each purpose (for beginners, there are like TurnKey solutions to stuff like NAS, it takes literally a few minutes to set up).

Backups (snapshots) are easy too, and a later migration to a better/next server is basically two clicks away.

bear, in Lightweight distro for home server?

Adding my voice to the Debian choir.

30p87, in Lightweight distro for home server?

Probably Debian. It’s basically the most used distro, and therefore has many online resources.

  • Old software, but very stable.
  • No bloat, very clean.
  • No custom programs interfering with any configurations etc.
  • Support for many server software etc.

If you want an even cleaner OS, where (nearly) everything is under your control and as lightweight as possible, Arch would be for you. There’s the bonus of the AUR, but the huge problem of newest, “unstable” software, though I’ve yet to experience any problem on testing repos, except for the Nvidia drivers. In general, Debian should be enough of lightweightiness and control.

ptman, in Lightweight distro for home server?

Linux is quite lightweight. Pick a distro that doesn’t run a lot of stuff by default. OpenBSD only runs sshd exposed to the network, AFAIR. Debian probably does the same. But really, the lightness comes from what isn’t running. NixOS, fedora, rocky, alpine are all decent alternatives.

bastion, in Lightweight distro for home server?

A lot of people are saying Debian, because Debian.

Debian. I’ve literally run Debian stable with uptimes of over a year.

giacomo, in Lightweight distro for home server?

I like debian

NegativeLookBehind, in Lightweight distro for home server?
@NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social avatar

Debian.

Fjor, in Lightweight distro for home server?
  • OpenSuse
  • Debian
  • Alpine

Would be the three I’d choose from atleast.

RootBeerGuy,
@RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de avatar

So… Debian.

butter, in Lightweight distro for home server?

I went Debian without a Desktop for my server. I later installed a desktop for the occasion that I need it. But mostly, I use SSH

Max_P, in Lightweight distro for home server?
@Max_P@lemmy.max-p.me avatar

Apart from Debian, I guess Alpine. It's quite popular in containers for its small size. Even Arch will be much bigger in that case because the packages are much less granular and install development libraries and headers for about everything.

JohnWick, in What feature are you dying for to come to your DE - Linux?

Please inbuilt on screen keyboard. For the love of god windows on screen keyboard is miles ahead of any Linux alternative and on Wayland the scene is even worse.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #