GustavoM,
@GustavoM@lemmy.world avatar

Popularity =/= quality tho. See: Windows. :^)

halm,
@halm@leminal.space avatar

Don’t worry, the joke is that the graph doesn’t have anything to do with popularity, it compares the OSes’ respective current versioning numbers 😉

Phoenix3875, (edited )

This, but unironically used as a marketing trick:

There was no v1 of Oracle Database, as co-founder Larry Ellison “knew no one would want to buy version 1”

That’s why the first Oracle database is v2.

en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_Database

dankm,

Slackware went from version 4 to 7 for a similar reason. But IIRC its reason was RedHat.

Evotech,

That’s a fun fact

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

this is what happened to windows 9, too.

juja,

What’s wrong with 9 though ? Didn’t iPhone also skip 9 ?

FuglyDuck,
@FuglyDuck@lemmy.world avatar

Dunno. But that’s a hardware model, ;)

hedgehog,

After the X/XS/XR phones they went to the 11. If the XS was 10 then the X would be 9. It is a bit weird for them to do 8 and 9 at the same time, though.

AVincentInSpace, (edited )

but the X is a Roman numeral hence why Apple demands that OSX be pronounced as “OS ten”

(I have not heard anyone who is not an Apple employee call it that but it’s the official stance, you can look it up)

Nibodhika,

No, the problem with Windows 9 is that a lot of things compared the version with 9* as a catch all for windows 95 and 98, so they were worried with backwards compatibility.

Xatolos,
@Xatolos@reddthat.com avatar

There wasn’t a Windows 9 because a lot of (poorly) written software will do a system check for Windows version and if the first number is “9”, it won’t work and complain that you need to be using a Windows OS newer than Windows 9x (95/98).

It was just for backwards compatibility more than anything.

theluckyone,

Gentoo. I’d tell you the version number, but I’m still compiling.

Surp,
@Surp@lemmy.world avatar

Windows 2000 wins I think

BunnyKnuckles,
@BunnyKnuckles@startrek.website avatar

Windows Server 2022

Surp,
@Surp@lemmy.world avatar

Oh dang!

xia,

One might take issue that it is not “current”.

tiny,

Tips Fedora 39

0x0,

Meanwhile, ChromeOS 120 is off the scale

lvxferre,
@lvxferre@lemmy.ml avatar

Lunix sucks so much that it got stuck into the version 2 for years.

Pacmanlives,

Laughs in OpenSuSe 42

milicent_bystandr,

That’s why it’s better than Ubuntu 23

AI_toothbrush,

Use gnome then

Grangle1,

Lowest version number, lowest need for radical change to keep up to date. Golf rules. Linux wins. Somebody get Tux a green jacket.

yardy_sardley,

I mean, technically Linux is still at 2.6, they’ve just been making up version numbers for the last 20 years or so.

Spoonbit,

:(

thecrotch,

All version numbers are made up

pineapplelover,

ahem I use arch btw

joeldebruijn,

MacOS according to other metrics tho. … xkcd.com/1056/

gregorum,

oldie but a goodie

Late2TheParty,
@Late2TheParty@lemmy.world avatar

There’s always an XKCD about it! I love it!

thisfro,

Gnome goes brr

Bogasse,

Browsers compared themselves with this metric for a while, but they had to stop before they reached an integer overflow.

grue,

Mac OS is actually at version 23 (they restarted the count at 10).

gregorum, (edited )

technically, Darwin, the microkernel, is at 23.2.0, but it was based on the Mach microkernel from NeXTSTEP/OPENSTEP (which is part of why it stared at 10)

the latest release of macOS is 14.2.1

grue,

I wasn’t trying to get into the weeds about actual kernel version numbers; I was just saying they made classic Mac OS from versions 1-9 and OS X from versions 1-14, and 9 + 14 = 23.

gregorum,

right, but the OS version number is 14.2.1. it’s the microkernel that’s 23.2.0

grue,

The OS version number is really 10.14.2.1, though.

gregorum, (edited )

wrong. Mac OS X ended with Mac OS 10.15 (Catalina) in 2018. macOS Big Sur, macOS 11, was the first in a new generation of macOS that succeeded macOS X and included significant architectural changes to the platform.

the current version is macOS 14.2.1 (Sonoma)

https://lemm.ee/pictrs/image/13fe39d4-d36c-41af-834b-5193854fae53.webp

grue,

I stand corrected. I gotta be honest: I used to daily-drive OS X up until about a decade ago, but I haven’t paid much attention to it since then.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linux@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #