linuxmemes

This magazine is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

notaviking, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.

Green Ubuntu for the win

doofer_name, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.

I drive a German Tiger btw.

PlexSheep, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.

What could fedora be? I think I’ll switch from it to debian unstable or mint when I make time.

TheInsane42, (edited )
@TheInsane42@lemmy.world avatar

Fedora is the beta of CentOS, which is the beta of RedHat/Rocky.

Ehm, the French BDR G1 B? (picking a tank from WoTB, designed but never bult as successor of B1)

_cnt0, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.
yum,

Care to explain? I’m not so familiar with tanks

_cnt0,

It’s more of a joke. The tank in the picture is a T28 Super Heavy Tank . It was developed in the US and was ludicrously large. Not being ready for serial production at the end of WW2 the project was canceled. Only two prototypes were ever built.

dream_weasel, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.

An absolutely and totally unbiased view ofc.

Chariotwheel,

Boy, I wonder which Linux distro OP uses

Pharmacokinetics,
@Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world avatar

Are we talking about War Thunder Russian bias or Linux Debian bias?

DragonTypeWyvern,

Image having a “War Thunder Russian bias” and still giving the Sherman more credit for beating the Nazis than the T-34.

I’m actually offended, and I’ll gladly throw down on any Wehraboo that thinks the Shermans were trash

TheInsane42, (edited ) in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.
@TheInsane42@lemmy.world avatar

Love the Debian conclusion. they just might deserve the superiority complex. (I have to admit, Debian is pretty stable)

BTW love the Centurions in WoTB, great tanks, all of them.

SaltyIceteaMaker, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.

That’s based off your comment under the arch-buttplug meme isn’t it

tuto193, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.

Where does NixOS place within these?

fl42v, (edited )

Some futuristic scifi-ish thing that is also a factory with a pocket dimension allowing you to easily morph/replicate it and pull previous versions from that pocket dimension if something went wrong… But the orders are given in some alien dialect, and from time to time you have to check how others have managed to convince it to do parts of the job you want and stitch together a solution while listening to it cursing at you cryptically

G0FuckThyself, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.
@G0FuckThyself@lemmy.world avatar

Tell me you’ve not used arch much, without telling me you’ve not used arch much.

cyanarchy, (edited )

As an arch user and a German heavy main, this actually feels fair. Both are capable machines but neither are going to maintain themselves, both come with an entire manual you’re expected to read, and nobody will be sympathetic to you if you don’t know the basics of what you’re doing (rotate the steel box for fucks sake).

Now comparing the StuG to Manjaro, that hurts.

anyhow2503,

Beyond the initial setup, Arch has become quite easy to maintain if you have some Linux erperience, mostly because the community has grown a lot in the past few years. Still wouldn’t recommend it to a complete beginner in most cases.

Now, which fucking tank doesn’t require regular maintenance or come with instructions you’re expected to remember?

WindowsEnjoyer, in If linux distributions were tools.

Not accurate at all. As bare minimum, Ubuntu should be dildo as it only gives you a great experience without assembling any sex toys lol.

cpw, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.

My brother used to drive British tanks, and constantly mocked other tank brands. I run Debian btw.

Moshpirit, in Oh no ...
@Moshpirit@lemmy.world avatar

Yes. Mastodon is mostly about linux and cats. You’re welcomed.

guskikalola,
@guskikalola@vivaldi.net avatar

@Moshpirit @ElCanut why cats, dogs are funnier :(

banneryear1868, in If linux distributions were tools.

Ubuntu and Kali are both just flavors of Debian though. Need RHEL logo on a corporate middle manager desk chair.

snoopfrog, (edited ) in If linux distributions were tools.

Real question if I can sneak one in. If I want to buy a machine suitable to run Darktable for photo editing, which Linux distribution would be ideal for that? Other than photo editing, I might watch movies in browser while browsing other sites on a different screen. That’s all I really use PC to do these days. Advice? I don’t want to accidently use a butt plug.

Edit for additional context if it wasn’t immediately apparent: I am a casual who just doesn’t like Microsoft. But I don’t use anything else that concerns me for a switch to Linux. I just want easy setup and use for my purposes.

alsimoneau,

I always recommend mint. There are a lot of small convenience features that remove friction points for new users and because it’s based on the very popular Ubuntu there are a lot of documentation out there.

governorkeagan,

I’ve switched from Windows 11 to Pop!_OS and don’t have any complaints. It looks different to Windows (no start menu like windows) but that wasn’t a turn off for me. If you want something that looks closer to a windows machine, Mint is a great option

trackcharlie,

I would personally recommend EndeavourOS or PopOS.

endeavouros.com

pop.system76.com

I recommend EndeavourOS primarily because of it’s ease of use and rolling distro means you’ll have access to the latest bug fixes and patches (and a very active and supportive community), whereas it does come with the drawback of requiring to fix things every now and then if you’ve installed packages from places other than endeavour/Aur or require packages/apps that are older.

Yay (package manager) is very easy to get using as a beginner, however, if you don’t want rolling updates and just large update packages similar in scope to windows service pack updates I’d recommend popos or the sister/base os ubuntu. (fedora apparently may be good in this instance as well but I’ve very little contact with the OS and have been avoiding RHEL-related products recently because of their anti-consumer and anti-open source actions recently).

Ultimately it’s definitely recommended that you try a few distro’s to get a feel for what you like and then customize to your hearts content.

distrowatch.com if you’d like a more in depth review of various distros and what their performance bonuses or problems are.

EndeavourOS with xfce4 is very clean and quick to pick up with their little introductory/learning module that they include (once installed or on live, it will provide a popup that includes the following):

https://lemmynsfw.com/pictrs/image/208118eb-0112-4ac8-a733-ce66b34c7781.webp

https://lemmynsfw.com/pictrs/image/3c8e9a1d-de68-47da-96a9-eb18cb009b09.webp

https://lemmynsfw.com/pictrs/image/4e711377-80de-4a7b-9c27-d91694e441c4.webp

https://lemmynsfw.com/pictrs/image/9a4c7588-fb9a-41e0-8097-84310e4c64fe.webp

_cnt0,

I have no experience with Darktable. But, really any and every distro should do it. Every distro comes with a learning curve. My personal advice would be not to go with distro derivatives. In the early days, Ubuntu was quite good, for making Debian “more accessible” to a larger audience and people unfamiliar with linux. I still like it for being an African success story. But, I can’t recommend it anymore for a slew of reasons. So, I’d say, go with debian, fedora, or even Arch. If you want to go with debian, you should know about non-free. If you go with fedora, you should know about rpmfusion. If you want to go with Arch, you should be comfortable with a more bare-bones and hands-on experience and reading the Arch-wiki (which is one of the most extensive and best wikis out there, and even useful if you use another distro). If you want something stable that just works and don’t need the newest of the new software, use debian. If you want the bleeding edge, that mostly just works, go with fedora. If you want the bleeding edge, want maximum control, and are not afraid to stay on top of it, go with Arch. Of course, many other distros could be a good pick for you. They all have pros and cons.

Sanctus, in If linux distros were WW2 tanks. Made by a guy who tries to play War Thunder with linux.
@Sanctus@lemmy.world avatar

Looking at unixporn, arch is a panzer 4

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • linuxmemes@lemmy.world
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #