hashferret,

I will pay for premium when it means they will not sell my data and will allow me control over my algorithm to prevent it from playing to my vulerabilities. Since they won’t change, I won’t pay.

TheFriar, (edited )

I will never pay for premium. Yewtu.be and all the similar front end ad killers are always there when ublock Origin gets half a step behind in the never ending cat and mouse it seems to have with YT. Fuck tech companies. Fuck YouTube. Fuck Reddit. Fuck em all.

usualsuspect191,

I also want to be charged the amount they actually make off of me. I suspect that’s less than the subscription price

lolcatnip,

Who are they selling your data to?

undercrust,

Literally everyone. Have you been living under a rock?

snowe,
@snowe@programming.dev avatar

Google doesn’t sell your data, they’re one of the few that don’t. That doesn’t mean they aren’t misusing your data though. They’re more the dragon hoarder than the thief selling off stolen goods. They want all your data so they can learn everything about you. Selling your data to others makes it worth way less. It’s a difference in strategy. Google retains the data to enhance their products, Facebook sells your data because they have no products that would be improved by keeping it.

undercrust,

Sorry if I miscommunicated. No, they’re not selling your home address. But the idea that they aren’t monetizing your personal data aggressively is laughably wrong and heavily documented.

eff.org/…/google-says-it-doesnt-sell-your-data-he…

lolcatnip, (edited )

So literally no one, then?

I don’t know who started this trend of “showing ads is the same thing as selling data” but it’s fucking irritating to see so many people confidently wrong about something they could figure out themselves if they thought about Google’s business model for 30 seconds.

uzay,

Showing ads is not the same as selling data, but it’s also not really what google is doing. Google spies on you and uses that data to sell access to you to any company that wants to exploit you. They’ve also been known to give (not sell) data on you to law enforcement based solely on your location data or things you looked up.

undercrust,

Since we’re all dummies and you know the answers, please go ahead and explain how Google goes about selling heavily targeted ads to uniquely identifiable groups, but that they also are not “selling data”.

Are we being massively pedantic and saying that it’s not actual user data, but rather leveraging said data to sell ads to the anonymized targeted groups, who are actively tracked by Google around the internet so ads can be served up at opportune times in their browsing?

Because that dumb argument is like saying Oxford Dictionary doesn’t sell words, they sell definitions; or that McDonalds doesn’t sell beef, they sell hamburgers.

Donkter,

There is a massive massive difference between using the data and selling the data.

lolcatnip, (edited )

They sell ads, but data. If you can’t see the difference I can’t help you. It’s not “pedantic”, it’s being factual. Sorry you apparently think facts don’t matter.

namingthingsiseasy,

when it means they will not sell my data and will allow me control over my algorithm to prevent it from playing to my vulerabilities

The problem is that this will never happen. That boat has sailed - companies will never give up on their existing revenue streams. They may say that paying today will exempt you from the ads, but it’s only a matter of time before they ramp up the cost and start showing ads anyway. That’s how cable television started, and it’s how internet streaming will end as well. And as for the not selling data/controlling the algorithm, well you have no way of proving that they don’t do that so they’ll do it no matter what they say.

There’s no reason for google to do this whatsoever. They have their business model - any new revenue streams will 100% definitely not reduce the other ones at all. It’s just gonna be another giant dump into the pile of enshittification.

Lazhward,

I simply turned off my watch history, no more algorithm.

MentalEdge, (edited )
@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz avatar

Haha yea, shame on them for trying to transition to a business model that’s actually a great value for the customer compared to other music and video playforms, no longer relies on datamining customers to maximize ad-effectiveness, and brings in more income for creators than ads ever did…

It’s a totally stupid idea, YT should just eat the costs and be subsidized by Google search revenue forever.

Why can’t we just keep taking from the platform while its expenses are covered by some shrinking group of shmucks who don’t know about ad-blockers yet, drowning in commercials?

/S

I don’t understand this outlook. Like, sure, you can use adblock. One person stealing a mars bar isn’t gonna hurt Walmart… But if literally everyone just took their shopping cart home, never once paying, Walmart would just… Cease to exist.

What makes people think that math is any different for online services?

triplenadir,
@triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml avatar

“Walmart would just… Cease to exist”

Utopia 😍

AVincentInSpace,

no longer relies on data mining customers to maximize ad effectiveness

You’re an idiot if you believe they won’t do that anyway.

MentalEdge, (edited )
@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz avatar

You don’t say. Everyone does it.

But it’s a shit source of income that nets mere cents per user, and should be made illegal as soon as political will allows.

Hence, a good service should not rely on collecting user data as a sole revenue source.

hemko, (edited )

Google doesn’t deserve your money.
You don’t pay a bully so that they bully you a little bit less

MentalEdge,
@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz avatar

That’s a very bad analogy.

That logic would lead to defect-defect scenarios in all but the rarest of cases.

By all means, defect when warranted, but if a bad company changing course doesn’t net rewards, why would corps ever do anything other than the worst possible, taking as many users down with them as they can snare?

GregorGizeh,

If google goes down someone else will fill the void. And I don’t give a shit about their numbers, if it’s not financially feasible to host everything without running a loss for years to extinguish competition and then to hike up the price, they should have thought of that before.

Aside from that, any Corp that goes down is a victory in my book.

MentalEdge,
@MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz avatar

Then I hope YT gets legally enshrined and archived in some way.

Like it or not, it is the sole complete repository of a lot of video and audio records for recent human history.

It’s become something that should not be under corporate control. Something which should be treated with care and reverence.

Yet it is, and isn’t.

Cortius,

I read everyone bitching about the ads but I don’t get them, and I have access to an awesome music streaming service too… you know, cause I have premium…

Sheeple, (edited )
@Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

I use Firefox with ublock origin and get all that for free

Cortius,

I won’t criticize you for that. If it works for you go for it. I just don’t want to.

sar1n,

Why would you admit to making poor financial decisions?

Cortius,

Why is it a bad decision? It’s the same cost as Spotify, but I get ad free videos. I don’t get this line of thinking…

arudesalad,

It also supports the creators of the video as well. If I had the money I would choose premium over an adblocker just because of that.

Cortius,

100% agree

namingthingsiseasy,

Why is it your responsibility to pay the creators? Google is a trillion dollar company and makes billions off of what people post on youtube. Shouldn’t they be paying them instead and not you?

Besides, it’s only a matter of time before Google takes more and more of the cut that you think you’re paying them.

diffcalculus,

Lmao… Amazing logic.

YouTube makes enough money to pay creators so you don’t have to.

Ok, how do you think YouTube makes money?

Error. Division by zero detected

snowe,
@snowe@programming.dev avatar

Your logic doesn’t make any sense. They make money off of people paying for a service or watching ads. If you’re blocking ads then you’re costing Google money and no creators are getting paid. If you’re paying for the service then you don’t get ads, and you pay the creators, and you pay for Google to keep running the service.

RIP_Cheems,
@RIP_Cheems@lemmy.world avatar

So…when are we raiding youtube?

milicent_bystandr,

Tomorrow. At dawn. See my YouTube video for the details, and keep in touch on the Google spreadsheet.

MacNCheezus,
@MacNCheezus@lemmy.today avatar

Yet people keep going back there… curious.

milicent_bystandr,

And paying

AdmiralShat, (edited )

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • OpenStars,
    @OpenStars@startrek.website avatar

    I just saw something similar on DuckDuckGo, and Firefox too - it’s f-ing everywhere.:-(

    Sheeple,
    @Sheeple@lemmy.world avatar

    And it’s leeching into lemmy via obvious astroturfing too. Ah yes an account less than a week old that does nothing but bring up how they pay for YouTube premium mmkay

    OpenStars,
    @OpenStars@startrek.website avatar

    Yikes!? Though never fail to underestimate the stupidity of… yeah okay I see your username, you already know that:-P.

    It’s like why didn’t peasants rise up and overthrow their royalty long so, as those in the USA & France eventually did? Bc there was always a tiny handful of people who benefited from the status quo, and were willing to defend it with their very lives.

    Or bc it’s Lemmy, it could also just be a pure Troll:-P.

    winterayars,

    Google really is the king of “you don’t REALLY mean ‘no’. Try again.”

    Russianranger,

    I’ve been slowly whittling down my subscriptions over time. At one point I think I had like 12-14 subs to various services, be it streaming, games, etc. But I was also up to my eyeballs in credit card debt and I had extremely poor personal finance skills and practices. When I met my wife, who was the exact opposite of me (extremely responsible with her finances, knew where every single one of her dollars was going), I knew I had to cut back significantly.

    Right now I have the following 5 subs per month;

    Apple 50gb data (1/month) YouTube Premium Family (22/month) Crunchyroll (8/month) Prime (15/month) ChatGPT (20/month)

    Basically 66/month in hard earned dollars.

    Prior to this I had the equivalent of an overblown cable package with all the bells and whistles, spending easily 350+ per month.

    I don’t judge anyone who decides to save their money, because we’re getting nickel and dimed to death. And by decentralizing the cost of subs to the point where it makes an Applebees menu look small, it makes it incredibly hard to figure out where your dollars are going, and hard to cancel as you need to contact a laundry list of independent service providers.

    My wife and I use YouTube and Crunchyroll as our primary entertainment sources, so we can justify those expenses. But all other sources (Netflix, HBO, Disney, Paramount, Hulu, etc) are so infrequent that we only sub for a single month if there is something we absolutely want to watch, and even then, we wait until the season is wrapping up so we can binge it in a week and then cancel the sub immediately.

    Just my perspective on it, and if we didn’t watch YouTube almost every night, we’d probably just figure out a way to hack the AppleTV to circumvent ads.

    Rosco,

    mpv + yt-dlp Enough said.

    unfnknblvbl, (edited )

    I started paying for YT Premium a few years ago when there was an election on, and one of the absolute worst minor parties that’s run by a billionaire just threw money at YouTube advertising.

    I haven’t looked back. I watch YT content on my ShieldTV poetry much exclusively, so adblock doesn’t work anyway :/

    TheObviousSolution,
    lemmytellyousomething,

    Last time I talked about YouTube here, people liked to throw their money to Google…

    It seems to be easy to turn a free service into a subscription service… I should probably buy Alphabet shares to profit from that…

    Makeshift,

    I would pay if it were more a more affordable price.

    I haven’t browsed apps in ages so idk if it’s still common, but I remember lots of apps having a lite version and a paid version. Lite version has ads and a sometimes couple less features. Full version ad-free and potential extra features.

    I liked that. Let me decide if I enjoyed the app enough to pay for the better version.

    Before Reddit went down in a fire, I paid premium even though I already had adblocker and no need for the premium features. And I would do the same for YouTube now, if it wasn’t so high priced.

    I am consciously learning now what I think I subconsciously already knew. If I value something enough, pay for it. And I DO value YouTube’s videos. The current cost is just a bit uncomfortably steep for a monthly subscription fee.

    Taleya,

    More ads? MORE ADS!!!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • memes@lemmy.ml
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #