@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

agamemnonymous

@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

agamemnonymous, (edited )
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Yup. Only works if you can hit your nap times every time without fail. A single missed nap will completely ruin everything. Not a lot of people have lives/jobs conducive to naps every 4 hours on the dot.

What is Something Scientific that you just don't believe in at all?

EDIT: Let’s cool it with the downvotes, dudes. We’re not out to cut funding to your black hole detection chamber or revoke the degrees of chiropractors just because a couple of us don’t believe in it, okay? Chill out, participate with the prompt and continue with having a nice day. I’m sure almost everybody has something...

agamemnonymous, (edited )
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

What it is, is an extremely powerful tool for reducing uncertainty about the world. Not eliminate, reduce. What it is not is a tool for “proving” “facts”. Claiming a “proven fact” is belief, not empirical science. An extremely consistent and useful theory, of course! But not a proven fact.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

If you’ll notice, that dude is somewhat elderly. Keep it up!

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I predict that once robotics and AI advanced beyond some particular threshold, human-on-human relationships will be seen as strange and needlessly fetishistic. Who would want some grimey partner with their own needs when you can generate an infinitely moldable soulmate?

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

You would think so, wouldn’t you? But how is it any different than fast food, porn, or trash tv?

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

You don’t make your own robot lover either. You do select it, same as you select your fast food order, porn video, and TV channel.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

The third person neuter pronoun in English, but that’s not important right now.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

On a serious note, yes Christmas was placed where it was in order to coincide with Saturnalia, the Roman winter solstice festival. This was an attempt by Constantine, the emperor who legalized Christianity in Rome, to transition the Romans to Christianity more easily.

A divorced couple divides their Beanie Baby collection in court, 1999 (lemmy.world)

Full caption: Nov 5, 1999, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Attorney Frank Totti looks over papers while his client Frances Mountain sorts out Beanie Babies with her ex-husband Harold Mountain in Judge Gerald Hardcastle’s Family Courtroom in Las Vegas November 5. The couple, who were divorced four months ago, were ordered to divide up...

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I wonder if this principle could be applied to voting districts.

What is your unpopular flim opinion

I’ll go first. Mine is that I can’t stand the Deadpool movies. They are self aware and self referential to an obnoxious degree. It’s like being continually reminded that I am in a movie. I swear the success of that movie has directly lead to every blockbuster having to have a joke every 30 seconds

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Primer and The Man from Earth are two of my all time favorite films. Production value is nice and all, but an interesting idea explored well wins every time for me.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Yeah that’s a good take, it’s like a modern Fifth Element.

Same director. I didn’t see it, but I love The Fifth Element

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

And I’m just telling you, we don’t do anything

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

It was more trouble than it was worth maintenance-wise considering the age, but my '66 Beetle. Such a fun little car, like an elaborate go-kart.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Think of it like this:

You can use a tennis ball machine to measure how far away a house is by firing the tennis ball at a constant velocity, timing how long it takes the tennis ball to come back to you, multiplying that time by the velocity, and dividing by 2 (since you measured the distance for a round trip). This works pretty darn well for measuring the distance to houses.

But now try this same trick to measure the distance to another ball. When your measuring ball hits the ball you want to measure, it doesn’t stay resolutely planted in the ground like that nice friendly house. The energy from your measuring ball bounces the ball being measured off into the distance. Even if you could get your measuring ball to return, the ball you measured isn’t in the place you measured it.

Replace that tennis ball with a photon, and you have the basic picture. There’s no such thing as passive observation. Measuring something interacts with that thing. Conventional measurement is like in the case with the house, the thing being measured is so much bigger and more stable than the thing we’re measuring with that the effect is negligible. But once you start trying to measure something on the same scale as your measuring tool, the ensuing chaos makes it basically impossible to get useful measurements.

agamemnonymous, (edited )
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

My favorite movie about time travel is Back to the Future, but the movie that I think did time travel best is Primer. If time travel works, it’s probably like that.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

If the owner did they occupy a class position as a worker and owner.

Yup. Employers are entitled to a portion of total revenue proportional to the value they added. In the case of employers who perform necessary work, including administrative/clerical work, this can be a healthy sum. In the case of employers who solely fit the capitalist role of investor, this amount is $0.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

Honestly with Jack Honey that probably wouldn’t be awful. Super sweet, but not awful.

agamemnonymous,
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

The daycare I went to after school when I was a kid had a few that got a lot of play, but the most obscure were a 1994 ABC Family animated rendition of The Secret Garden and a 1985 Hanna-Barbera Pound Puppies TV special.

agamemnonymous, (edited )
@agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works avatar

I wouldn’t be surprised, especially for A-listers, especially on-set. Eye-contact promotes conversations which, even when they are more stimulating than “Oh wow! You’re _____!! I loved you in that thing”, eat up time in a very busy production schedule. It’s even worse if the star is genuinely nice and personable, and sincerely appreciates their fans. It adds up to hours gone every day in 3-6 minute increments.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • localhost
  • All magazines
  • Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #