roguetrick

@roguetrick@kbin.social

This profile is from a federated server and may be incomplete. Browse more on the original instance.

roguetrick,

You can waterboard them with it. If you want to effectively kill them, I'd recommend using the tried and true neurotoxin option sold at your local grocery store. You can be your own Saddam Hussein without having to hide in the most random places after committing your war crimes.

roguetrick,

While you can create spiracles that repel polar substances like water, you cannot protect them against surfactant like soap. No more showers unless you want to drown.

roguetrick,

Manual/deliberate control over fat creation and storage.

Monkey's paw on this one is that you'd end up having some pretty fantastic explosive diarrhea as the bacteria chow down on your energy loaded waste.

roguetrick, (edited )

in which case penises would have to compensate I guess

Brother, if you're penetrating the cervix, you are doing it wrong.

roguetrick,

Goddamn ear fuckers.

roguetrick,

We have Miles O'Brien at home.

roguetrick, (edited )

Free Palestine

You're missing one state solution. That's what's essentially going to happen as things go. They're depopulating gaza with the plan to eventually grant citizenship to the reduced population of Palestinians so they can maintain a jewish majority. West bank alone wouldn't cause a loss in majority, but Gaza would. They won't grant right of return. Though that is genocide.

roguetrick,

What's easier to understand: ankle anatomy or Ubuntu publishing.

Alright, I'm gonna "take one for the team" -- what is with the "downvote-happy" users lately?

Title. “lmao internet points” and all, but what is the point of participating in a community that sees assumptions and other commonly non-harmful commentaries/posts as “bad” this easily? Do folks in here are really that needy of self-validation, even if it means seeking such from something completely insignificant like...

roguetrick,

Don't worry about it. If you were really wrong someone would chomp at the bit to reply to you about how wrong you are. If they're not, you either have an unpopular or popular enough to be spam, opinion.

roguetrick,

Emphasizing what the other poster said, you don't want to compress anything that traps air. Your best insulator, by far, is trapped air.

roguetrick,

They stole these assets from a second life porn shop.

roguetrick, (edited )

Pretty much as soon as we hit the agrarian revolution and started developing spirit/charisma/mana/face.

roguetrick,

Well what would you know about it, ernest.

roguetrick,

If you post bad memes in a shitposting community, aren't you just really good at shitposting?

roguetrick,

With a user base that mostly consists of a mix of economically liberal privacy advocates and leftists, I wouldn't expect too many to view a company like Google to be a long term positive influence on the world.

roguetrick,

Man we're all fucking old people here aren't we.

roguetrick,

No it'll be someone else, but it'll still be played by Combs.

roguetrick,

Yeah but which only fans pages should I follow as a Linux user

roguetrick,

At this point she's just mad at you for reacting like you are.

roguetrick,

You're not a bank, the details don't matter. Don't even bother with getting anything in writing from someone who is over leveraged, because you're already never getting that money back in any court regardless since the other creditors come first.

roguetrick,

He said I can make money by apply for loan against property, and loan to him and pocket the different.

You never give loans to someone that you're not completely prepared to write off. You absolutely don't give loans with loans (unless you're a bank and getting those loans from a central bank, which I doubt you are).

roguetrick,

Risa doesn't allow AI images.

roguetrick,

Cavill is such a goddamn nerd.

roguetrick, (edited )

I am conflicted on how I feel about that. Obviously information dragonets are bad because they're specifically designed to produce false positives. In this case, however, they produced a definite positive that wouldn't have been achieved otherwise.

Edit:

The good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule provides that “evidence
obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment should not be suppressed in
circumstances where the evidence was obtained by officers acting in objectively
reasonable reliance on a warrant issued by a detached and neutral magistrate, even
if that warrant was later determined to be invalid.” Gutierrez, 222 P.3d at 941; see
also Leftwich, 869 P.2d at 1272 (holding that Colorado’s good-faith exception,
35
codified in section 16-3-308, C.R.S. (2023), is “substantially similar” to the Supreme
Court’s rule). The exception exists because there is little chance suppression will
deter police misconduct in cases where the police didn’t know their conduct was
illegal in the first place. Leon, 468 U.S. at 918–19. In such cases, “the social costs of
suppression would outweigh any possible deterrent effect.

But the good-faith analysis in Gutierrez is distinguishable. True, we held
there that the good-faith exception did not apply, but we had already recognized
that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their financial records
when Gutierrez was decided. Id. at 933 (citing numerous cases and statutes
establishing that an individual’s financial records are protected under Colorado
law). So, the police were on notice that a nexus was required between a crime and
Gutierrez’s individual tax records. See id.

38
¶70 By contrast, until today, no court had established that individuals have a
constitutionally protected privacy interest in their Google search history. Cf.
Commonwealth v. Kurtz, 294 A.3d 509, 522 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2023) (holding that, under
the third-party doctrine, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of
privacy in his search history). In the absence of precedent explicitly establishing
that an individual’s Google search history is constitutionally protected, DPD had
no reason to know that it might have needed to demonstrate a connection between
the alleged crime and Seymour’s individual Google account.

In essence, the court is saying that this is the one and only time this will be allowed in Colorado.

https://www.courts.state.co.us/userfiles/file/Court_Probation/Supreme_Court/Opinions/2023/23SA12.pdf

roguetrick, (edited )

Hold my torque wrench I'm going in.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • •
  • localhost
  • All magazines
    •
    Loading…
    Loading the web debug toolbar…
    Attempt #